Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival in Japan

Authors: Kenjiro Kotake, Michio Asano, Heita Ozawa, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Kenichi Sugihara

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A gender difference in survival has been documented in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, although the underlying mechanism remains undefined. This study aimed to gain improved insight into this difference, with a special focus on improved cancer-specific survival.

Methods

The study population consisted of 82,402 patients with invasive CRC who had undergone surgery in Japan between 1985 and 2004. To estimate improved survival, multivariate adjustment using patient demographics and tumor characteristics was performed.

Results

Patient characteristics changed over time. The 5-year survival rates increased from 66.5 to 76.3 % during the study period. Higher survival rates persisted in women over time (multivariate-adjustment model—hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.85–0.90). Patients who received surgery during the period 2000–2004 had significantly longer survival than those during the period 1985–1989 (men: HR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.67–0.74; women: HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.67–0.76). However, there was no gender difference regarding improved survival.

Conclusions

A reduced risk of cancer-specific death for women relative to men persisted over time; however, enhancement of survival was equally observed in both genders. Identification of factors associated with gender differences and changes over time in CRC survival may serve as targets for further improvement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M et al (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed on 27 Apr 2015 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M et al (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed on 27 Apr 2015
2.
go back to reference Gao RN, Neutel CI, Wai E (2008) Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, hospitalizations and surgical procedures in Canada. J Public Health (Oxf) 30(2):194–201CrossRef Gao RN, Neutel CI, Wai E (2008) Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, hospitalizations and surgical procedures in Canada. J Public Health (Oxf) 30(2):194–201CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cheng X, Chen VW, Steele B et al (2001) Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender, and age group in the United States, 1992–1997. Cancer 92(10):2547–2554CrossRefPubMed Cheng X, Chen VW, Steele B et al (2001) Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender, and age group in the United States, 1992–1997. Cancer 92(10):2547–2554CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, CONCORD Working Group et al (2015) Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 385(9972):977–1010CrossRefPubMed Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, CONCORD Working Group et al (2015) Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 385(9972):977–1010CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zeng C, Wen W, Morgans A et al (2015) Disparities by race, age, and sex in the improvement of survival for major cancers: results from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010. JAMA Oncol 1(1):88–96CrossRefPubMed Zeng C, Wen W, Morgans A et al (2015) Disparities by race, age, and sex in the improvement of survival for major cancers: results from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010. JAMA Oncol 1(1):88–96CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Matsuda T, Ajiki W, Marugame T et al, Research Group of Population-Based Cancer Registries of Japan: monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan—Survival 2003–2005 Report (Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 2013) (2011) Population-based survival of cancer patients diagnosed between 1993 and 1999 in Japan: a chronological and international comparative study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41:40–51CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Ajiki W, Marugame T et al, Research Group of Population-Based Cancer Registries of Japan: monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan—Survival 2003–2005 Report (Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 2013) (2011) Population-based survival of cancer patients diagnosed between 1993 and 1999 in Japan: a chronological and international comparative study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41:40–51CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer (MOSAIC) Investigators: oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2343–2351CrossRefPubMed André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer (MOSAIC) Investigators: oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2343–2351CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ et al (2009) Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27(22):3677–3683PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ et al (2009) Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27(22):3677–3683PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibata A et al (2013) Cancer Incidence and Incidence Rates in Japan in 2008: a Study of 25 Population-based Cancer Registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44(4):388–396CrossRef Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibata A et al (2013) Cancer Incidence and Incidence Rates in Japan in 2008: a Study of 25 Population-based Cancer Registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44(4):388–396CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K et al (2003) Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: an extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10 Suppl):S32–S43PubMed Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K et al (2003) Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: an extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10 Suppl):S32–S43PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rhodes JB, Holmes FF, Clark GM (1997) Changing distribution of primary cancers in the large bowel. JAMA 238(15):1641–1643CrossRef Rhodes JB, Holmes FF, Clark GM (1997) Changing distribution of primary cancers in the large bowel. JAMA 238(15):1641–1643CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ji BT, Devesa SS, Chow WH et al (1998) Colorectal cancer incidence trends by subsite in urban Shanghai, 1972–1994. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 7(8):661–666 Ji BT, Devesa SS, Chow WH et al (1998) Colorectal cancer incidence trends by subsite in urban Shanghai, 1972–1994. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 7(8):661–666
14.
go back to reference Wichmann MW, Müller C, Hornung HM et al (2001) Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 88(8):1092–1098CrossRefPubMed Wichmann MW, Müller C, Hornung HM et al (2001) Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 88(8):1092–1098CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2003) Male gender adversely affects survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 90(6):711–715CrossRefPubMed McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2003) Male gender adversely affects survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 90(6):711–715CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Paulson EC, Wirtalla C, Armstrong K et al (2009) Gender influences treatment and survival in colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 52(12):1982–1991CrossRefPubMed Paulson EC, Wirtalla C, Armstrong K et al (2009) Gender influences treatment and survival in colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 52(12):1982–1991CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Verschueren RC, Mulder NH, Van Loon AJ et al (1997) The anatomical substrate for a differences in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients. Anticancer Res 17(1B):637–641PubMed Verschueren RC, Mulder NH, Van Loon AJ et al (1997) The anatomical substrate for a differences in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients. Anticancer Res 17(1B):637–641PubMed
19.
go back to reference Fietkau R, Rödel C, Hohenberger W et al (2007) Rectal cancer delivery of radiotherapy in adequate time and with adequate dose is influenced by treatment center, treatment schedule, and gender and is prognostic parameter for local control: results of study CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(4):1008–1019CrossRefPubMed Fietkau R, Rödel C, Hohenberger W et al (2007) Rectal cancer delivery of radiotherapy in adequate time and with adequate dose is influenced by treatment center, treatment schedule, and gender and is prognostic parameter for local control: results of study CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(4):1008–1019CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Slattery ML, Friedman GD, Potter JD et al (1996) A description of age, sex, and site distributions of colon carcinoma in three geographic areas. Cancer 78(8):1666–1670CrossRefPubMed Slattery ML, Friedman GD, Potter JD et al (1996) A description of age, sex, and site distributions of colon carcinoma in three geographic areas. Cancer 78(8):1666–1670CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McMillan DC, Wotherspoon HA, Fearon KC et al (1995) A prospective study of tumor recurrence and the acute-phase response after apparently cur active colorectal cancer surgery. Am J Surg 170(4):319–322CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC, Wotherspoon HA, Fearon KC et al (1995) A prospective study of tumor recurrence and the acute-phase response after apparently cur active colorectal cancer surgery. Am J Surg 170(4):319–322CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ward R, Meagher A, Tomlinson I et al (2001) Microsatellite instability and the clinicopathological features of sporadic colorectal cancer. Gut 48(6):821–829PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ward R, Meagher A, Tomlinson I et al (2001) Microsatellite instability and the clinicopathological features of sporadic colorectal cancer. Gut 48(6):821–829PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hawkins N, Norrie M, Cheong K et al (2002) CpG island methylation in sporadic colorectal cancers and its relationship to microsatellite instability. Gastroenterology 122(5):1376–1387CrossRefPubMed Hawkins N, Norrie M, Cheong K et al (2002) CpG island methylation in sporadic colorectal cancers and its relationship to microsatellite instability. Gastroenterology 122(5):1376–1387CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ogino S, Cantor M, Kawasaki T et al (2006) CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies. Gut 55(7):1000–1006PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ogino S, Cantor M, Kawasaki T et al (2006) CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies. Gut 55(7):1000–1006PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Martling A, Granath F, Cedermark B et al (2009) Gender differences in the treatment of rectal cancer: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(4):427–433CrossRefPubMed Martling A, Granath F, Cedermark B et al (2009) Gender differences in the treatment of rectal cancer: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(4):427–433CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rayson D, Urquhart R, Cox M et al (2012) Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8(4):253–259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rayson D, Urquhart R, Cox M et al (2012) Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8(4):253–259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Jessup JM, Stewart A, Greene FL et al (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: implications of race/ethnicity, age, and differentiation. JAMA 294(21):2703–2711CrossRefPubMed Jessup JM, Stewart A, Greene FL et al (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: implications of race/ethnicity, age, and differentiation. JAMA 294(21):2703–2711CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Verschueren RC, Mulder NH, Van Loon AJ et al (1997) The anatomical substrate for a differences in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients. Anticancer Res 17(1B):637–641PubMed Verschueren RC, Mulder NH, Van Loon AJ et al (1997) The anatomical substrate for a differences in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients. Anticancer Res 17(1B):637–641PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival in Japan
Authors
Kenjiro Kotake
Michio Asano
Heita Ozawa
Hirotoshi Kobayashi
Kenichi Sugihara
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0868-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine