Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

Five-year potency preservation after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy

Authors: Shuichi Nishimura, Atsunori Yorozu, Toshio Ohashi, Masanori Sakayori, Yasuto Yagi, Toru Nishiyama, Shiro Saito, Yutaka Shiraishi, Kayo Yoshida, Kazuhito Toya, Naoyuki Shigematsu

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to evaluate long-term erectile function following prostate brachytherapy, based on patient characteristics and treatment factors.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2006, 665 men with localized prostate cancer were treated with 125I permanent seed implantation. None was given adjuvant hormone therapy. Erectile function was assessed before treatment, and at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after implantation using the Mount Sinai Erectile Function Score (MSEFS) of 0–3 (0 = no erections, 1 = erections insufficient for intercourse, 2 = suboptimal erections but sufficient for intercourse, 3 = normal erectile function). Potency was defined as score 2 or 3, and 382 men were potent before treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data from these 382 patients to identify variables associated with potency preservation.

Results

In patients who were potent before treatment, the actuarial potency preservation rate fell to 46.2 % at 6 months after brachytherapy, and then slowly recovered reaching 52.0 % at 5 years after brachytherapy. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age (p = 0.04) and pre-treatment MSEFS (p < 0.001) were predictors of 5-year potency preservation. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy affected potency preservation only at 6 months after brachytherapy.

Conclusions

Patient age at implantation and pre-treatment erectile function are predictive factors for the development of erectile dysfunction following prostate brachytherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kupelian PA, Potters L, Khuntia D et al (2004) Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy < 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≥72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1–T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:25–33PubMedCrossRef Kupelian PA, Potters L, Khuntia D et al (2004) Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy < 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≥72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1–T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:25–33PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Peschel RE, Colberg JW (2003) Surgery, brachytherapy, and external-beam radiotherapy for early prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 4:233–241PubMedCrossRef Peschel RE, Colberg JW (2003) Surgery, brachytherapy, and external-beam radiotherapy for early prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 4:233–241PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250–1261PubMedCrossRef Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250–1261PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Robinson JW, Moritz S, Fung T (2002) Meta-analysis of rates of erectile function after treatment of localized prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:1063–1068PubMedCrossRef Robinson JW, Moritz S, Fung T (2002) Meta-analysis of rates of erectile function after treatment of localized prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:1063–1068PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Crook JM, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Wallace K et al (2011) Comparison of health-related quality of life 5 years after SPIRIT: surgical prostatectomy versus interstitial radiation intervention trial. J Clin Oncol 29:362–368PubMedCrossRef Crook JM, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Wallace K et al (2011) Comparison of health-related quality of life 5 years after SPIRIT: surgical prostatectomy versus interstitial radiation intervention trial. J Clin Oncol 29:362–368PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR et al (2011) Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA 306:1205–1214PubMedCrossRef Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR et al (2011) Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA 306:1205–1214PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zelefsky MJ, Hollister T, Raben A et al (2000) Five-year biochemical outcome and toxicity with transperineal CT-planned permanent I-125 prostate implantation for patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef Zelefsky MJ, Hollister T, Raben A et al (2000) Five-year biochemical outcome and toxicity with transperineal CT-planned permanent I-125 prostate implantation for patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stone NN, Stock RG (2007) Long-term urinary, sexual, and rectal morbidity in patients treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy followed up for a minimum of 5 years. Urology 69:338–342PubMedCrossRef Stone NN, Stock RG (2007) Long-term urinary, sexual, and rectal morbidity in patients treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy followed up for a minimum of 5 years. Urology 69:338–342PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Merrick GS, Butler WM, Wallner KE et al (2005) Erectile function after prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:437–447PubMedCrossRef Merrick GS, Butler WM, Wallner KE et al (2005) Erectile function after prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:437–447PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological A (2005) Clinicopathological statistics on registered prostate cancer patients in Japan: 2000 report from the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 12:46–61CrossRef Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological A (2005) Clinicopathological statistics on registered prostate cancer patients in Japan: 2000 report from the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 12:46–61CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ohashi T, Yorozu A, Toya K et al (2005) Acute urinary morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 10:262–268PubMedCrossRef Ohashi T, Yorozu A, Toya K et al (2005) Acute urinary morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 10:262–268PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ohashi T, Yorozu A, Toya K et al (2007) Rectal morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:121–126PubMedCrossRef Ohashi T, Yorozu A, Toya K et al (2007) Rectal morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:121–126PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yoshida K, Ohashi T, Yorozu A et al (2013) Comparison of preplanning and intraoperative planning for I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:383–389PubMedCrossRef Yoshida K, Ohashi T, Yorozu A et al (2013) Comparison of preplanning and intraoperative planning for I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:383–389PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stock RG, Stone NN, Cesaretti JA et al (2006) Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:527–533PubMedCrossRef Stock RG, Stone NN, Cesaretti JA et al (2006) Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:527–533PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stock RG, Kao J, Stone NN (2001) Penile erectile function after permanent radioactive seed implantation for treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 165:436–439PubMedCrossRef Stock RG, Kao J, Stone NN (2001) Penile erectile function after permanent radioactive seed implantation for treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 165:436–439PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zagar TM, Stock RG, Cesaretti JA et al (2007) Assessment of postbrachytherapy sexual function: a comparison of the IIEF-5 and the MSEFS. Brachytherapy 6:26–33PubMedCrossRef Zagar TM, Stock RG, Cesaretti JA et al (2007) Assessment of postbrachytherapy sexual function: a comparison of the IIEF-5 and the MSEFS. Brachytherapy 6:26–33PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW et al (2009) Erectile function durability following permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:639–648PubMedCrossRef Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW et al (2009) Erectile function durability following permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:639–648PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Potters L, Torre T, Fearn PA et al (2001) Potency after permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:1235–1242PubMedCrossRef Potters L, Torre T, Fearn PA et al (2001) Potency after permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:1235–1242PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Snyder KM, Stock RG, Buckstein M et al (2012) Long-term potency preservation following brachytherapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:221–225PubMedCrossRef Snyder KM, Stock RG, Buckstein M et al (2012) Long-term potency preservation following brachytherapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:221–225PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kollmeier MA, Fidaleo A, Pei X et al (2013) Favourable long-term outcomes with brachytherapy-based regimens in men ≤60 years with clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 111:1231–1236PubMedCrossRef Kollmeier MA, Fidaleo A, Pei X et al (2013) Favourable long-term outcomes with brachytherapy-based regimens in men ≤60 years with clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 111:1231–1236PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zelefsky MJ, McKee AB, Lee H et al (1999) Efficacy of oral sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 53:775–778PubMedCrossRef Zelefsky MJ, McKee AB, Lee H et al (1999) Efficacy of oral sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 53:775–778PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bannowsky A, Schulze H, van der Horst C et al (2008) Recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: improvement with nightly low-dose sildenafil. BJU Int 101:1279–1283PubMedCrossRef Bannowsky A, Schulze H, van der Horst C et al (2008) Recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: improvement with nightly low-dose sildenafil. BJU Int 101:1279–1283PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pahlajani G, Raina R, Jones JS et al (2010) Early intervention with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors after prostate brachytherapy improves subsequent erectile function. BJU Int 106:1524–1527PubMedCrossRef Pahlajani G, Raina R, Jones JS et al (2010) Early intervention with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors after prostate brachytherapy improves subsequent erectile function. BJU Int 106:1524–1527PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Five-year potency preservation after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy
Authors
Shuichi Nishimura
Atsunori Yorozu
Toshio Ohashi
Masanori Sakayori
Yasuto Yagi
Toru Nishiyama
Shiro Saito
Yutaka Shiraishi
Kayo Yoshida
Kazuhito Toya
Naoyuki Shigematsu
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0632-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine