Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer

Authors: Katsuyoshi Hashine, Hiroyuki Iio, Yoshiteru Ueno, Shohei Tsukimori, Iku Ninomiya

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The goals of the study were to examine surveillance biopsy and active treatment in patients under active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer and to determine the active treatment-free survival rate.

Methods

The subjects were 87 patients with low-risk prostate cancer who were under AS between 2000 and 2010. The eligibility criteria for AS were T1c, Gleason score ≤6, prostate-specific antigen level ≤10 ng/ml, one or two positive biopsies, maximum cancer involvement ≤50 %, and age ≤80 years old.

Results

Of the 87 patients, 48 underwent the first surveillance biopsy (55.2 %). In this biopsy, no cancer was found in 33.3 % of cases, 27.1 % remained eligible for AS, and 39.6 % did not meet the AS criteria (up-grade 22.9 %, up-volume 16.7 %). A second surveillance-biopsy was performed at 1.9 years after the first biopsy. No cancer was found in 20.0 % of cases, 40.0 % remained eligible for AS, and 40.0 % did not meet the AS criteria (up-grade 26.7 %, up-volume 13.3 %). A total of 50 patients received treatment by 1.7 years after starting AS, mainly due to an up-grade or up-volume. However, some patients underwent radiotherapy despite biopsy results indicating no cancer or eligibility for AS. The active treatment-free survival rate was 64.1 % after 2 years.

Conclusions

Surveillance biopsy is important for identifying patients who require active treatment. The results in this study allowed determination of the active treatment-free survival rate and are informative for making treatment decisions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Klotz L (2011) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise. J Clin Oncol 29:3669–3676PubMedCrossRef Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Klotz L (2011) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise. J Clin Oncol 29:3669–3676PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R et al (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63:597–603PubMedCrossRef Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R et al (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63:597–603PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Shiraishi T et al (2008) Prospective evaluation of selection criteria for active surveillance in Japanese patients with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer. Int J Urol 38:122–128 Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Shiraishi T et al (2008) Prospective evaluation of selection criteria for active surveillance in Japanese patients with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer. Int J Urol 38:122–128
4.
go back to reference Tosoian JJ, Trock BJ, Landis P et al (2011) Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol 29:2185–2190PubMedCrossRef Tosoian JJ, Trock BJ, Landis P et al (2011) Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol 29:2185–2190PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eggener SE, Mueller A, Berglund RK et al (2009) A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1635–1641PubMedCrossRef Eggener SE, Mueller A, Berglund RK et al (2009) A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1635–1641PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bul M, Van den Bergh RC, Rannikko A et al (2012) Predictors of unfavorable repeat biopsy results in men participating in a prospective active surveillance program. Eur Urol 61:370–377PubMedCrossRef Bul M, Van den Bergh RC, Rannikko A et al (2012) Predictors of unfavorable repeat biopsy results in men participating in a prospective active surveillance program. Eur Urol 61:370–377PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE et al (2011) Changes in prostate cancer grade on serial biopsy in men undergoing active surveillance. J Clin Oncol 29:2795–2800PubMedCrossRef Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE et al (2011) Changes in prostate cancer grade on serial biopsy in men undergoing active surveillance. J Clin Oncol 29:2795–2800PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE et al (2011) Changes in cancer volume in serial biopsies of men on active surveillance for early stage prostate cancer. J Urol 186:1825–1829PubMedCrossRef Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE et al (2011) Changes in cancer volume in serial biopsies of men on active surveillance for early stage prostate cancer. J Urol 186:1825–1829PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference San Francisco IF, Werner L, Regan MM et al (2011) Risk stratification and validation of prostate specific antigen density as independent predictor of progression in men with low risk prostate cancer during active surveillance. J Urol 185:471–476PubMedCrossRef San Francisco IF, Werner L, Regan MM et al (2011) Risk stratification and validation of prostate specific antigen density as independent predictor of progression in men with low risk prostate cancer during active surveillance. J Urol 185:471–476PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Whitson JM, Porten SP, Hilton JF et al (2011) The relationship between prostate specific antigen change and biopsy progression in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol 185:1656–1660PubMedCrossRef Whitson JM, Porten SP, Hilton JF et al (2011) The relationship between prostate specific antigen change and biopsy progression in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol 185:1656–1660PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW et al (2007) Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol 178:S14–S19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW et al (2007) Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol 178:S14–S19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fujimoto H, Nakanishi H, Miki T et al (2011) Oncological outcomes of the prostate cancer patients registered in 2004: report from the Cancer Registration Committee of the JUA. Int J Urol 18:876–881PubMedCrossRef Fujimoto H, Nakanishi H, Miki T et al (2011) Oncological outcomes of the prostate cancer patients registered in 2004: report from the Cancer Registration Committee of the JUA. Int J Urol 18:876–881PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Adamy A, Yee DS, Matsushita K et al (2011) Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 185:477–482PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Adamy A, Yee DS, Matsushita K et al (2011) Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 185:477–482PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Conti SL, Dall’era M, Fradet V et al (2009) Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1628–1633PubMedCrossRef Conti SL, Dall’era M, Fradet V et al (2009) Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1628–1633PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dall’Era MA, Cowan JE, Simko J et al (2011) Surgical management after active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: pathological outcomes compared with men undergoing immediate treatment. BJU Int 107:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef Dall’Era MA, Cowan JE, Simko J et al (2011) Surgical management after active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: pathological outcomes compared with men undergoing immediate treatment. BJU Int 107:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Seiler D, Randazzo M, Klotz L et al (2012) Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort. BJU Int 110:195–200PubMedCrossRef Seiler D, Randazzo M, Klotz L et al (2012) Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort. BJU Int 110:195–200PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sugimoto M, Shiraishi T, Tsunemori H et al (2010) Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy in Japanese prospective active surveillance cohort. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:973–979PubMedCrossRef Sugimoto M, Shiraishi T, Tsunemori H et al (2010) Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy in Japanese prospective active surveillance cohort. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:973–979PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference O’Brien D, Loeb S, Carvalhal GF et al (2011) Delay of surgery in men with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 185:2143–2147PubMedCrossRef O’Brien D, Loeb S, Carvalhal GF et al (2011) Delay of surgery in men with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 185:2143–2147PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ross AE, Loeb S, Landis P et al (2010) Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. J Clin Oncol 28:2810–2816PubMedCrossRef Ross AE, Loeb S, Landis P et al (2010) Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. J Clin Oncol 28:2810–2816PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:126–131PubMedCrossRef Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:126–131PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vasarainen H, Lokman U, Ruutu M et al (2012) Prostate cancer active surveillance and health-related quality of life: results of the Finnish arm of the prospective trial. BJU Int 109:1614–1619PubMedCrossRef Vasarainen H, Lokman U, Ruutu M et al (2012) Prostate cancer active surveillance and health-related quality of life: results of the Finnish arm of the prospective trial. BJU Int 109:1614–1619PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Johansson E, Steineck G, Holmberg L et al (2011) Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 12:891–899PubMedCrossRef Johansson E, Steineck G, Holmberg L et al (2011) Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 12:891–899PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Daubenmier JJ, Weidner G, Marlin R et al (2006) Lifestyle and health-related quality of life of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Urology 67:125–130PubMedCrossRef Daubenmier JJ, Weidner G, Marlin R et al (2006) Lifestyle and health-related quality of life of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Urology 67:125–130PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
Authors
Katsuyoshi Hashine
Hiroyuki Iio
Yoshiteru Ueno
Shohei Tsukimori
Iku Ninomiya
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0584-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine