Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurosurgical Review 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Glioma | Review

Reliability of intraoperative ultrasound in detecting tumor residual after brain diffuse glioma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Gianluca Trevisi, Paolo Barbone, Giorgio Treglia, Maria Vittoria Mattoli, Annunziato Mangiola

Published in: Neurosurgical Review | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Intraoperative ultrasonography (iUS) is considered an accurate, safe, and cost-effective tool to estimate the extent of resection of both high-grade (HGG) and low-grade (DLGG) diffuse gliomas (DGs). However, it is currently missing an evidence-based assessment of iUS diagnostic accuracy in DGs surgery. The objective of review is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of iUS in detecting tumor residue after DGs resection. A comprehensive literature search for studies published through October 2018 was performed according to PRISMA-DTA and STARD 2015 guidelines, using the following algorithm: (“ultrasound” OR “ultrasonography” OR “ultra-so*” OR “echo*” OR “eco*”) AND (“brain” OR “nervous”) AND (“tumor” OR “tumour” OR “lesion” OR “mass” OR “glio*” OR “GBM”) AND (“surgery” OR “surgical” OR “microsurg*” OR “neurosurg*”). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of iUS in DGs were calculated. A subgroup analysis for HGGs and DLGGs was also conducted. Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review (665 DGs). Ten articles (409 DGs) were selected for the meta-analysis with the following results: sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 93.5%, LR− 0.29, LR+ 3, and DOR 9.67. Heterogeneity among studies was non-significant. Subgroup analysis demonstrates a better diagnostic performance of iUS for DLGGs compared with HGGs. iUS is an effective technique in assessing DGs resection. No significant differences are seen regarding iUS modality and transducer characteristics. Its diagnostic performance is higher in DLGGs than HGGs and could be worsened by previous treatments, surgical artifacts, and small tumor residue volumes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Altieri R, Melcarne A, Di Perna G, Specchia FMC, Fronda C, La Rocca G, Cofano F, Sabatino G, Pepa GMD, Olivi A, Ducati A, Garbossa D (2018) Intra-operative ultrasound: tips and tricks for making the most in neurosurgery. Surg Technol Int 33:353–360PubMed Altieri R, Melcarne A, Di Perna G, Specchia FMC, Fronda C, La Rocca G, Cofano F, Sabatino G, Pepa GMD, Olivi A, Ducati A, Garbossa D (2018) Intra-operative ultrasound: tips and tricks for making the most in neurosurgery. Surg Technol Int 33:353–360PubMed
2.
go back to reference Altieri R, Zenga F, Fontanella MM, Cofano F, Agnoletti A, Spena G, Crobeddu E, Fornaro R, Ducati A, Garbossa D (2015) Glioma surgery: technological advances to achieve a maximal safe resection. Surg Technol Int 27:297–302PubMed Altieri R, Zenga F, Fontanella MM, Cofano F, Agnoletti A, Spena G, Crobeddu E, Fornaro R, Ducati A, Garbossa D (2015) Glioma surgery: technological advances to achieve a maximal safe resection. Surg Technol Int 27:297–302PubMed
4.
go back to reference Attia J (2003) Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests. Aust Prescr 26:11–13CrossRef Attia J (2003) Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests. Aust Prescr 26:11–13CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Beiko J, Suki D, Hess KR, Fox BD, Cheung V, Cabral M, Shonka N, Gilbert MR, Sawaya R, Prabhu SS, Weinberg J, Lang FF, Aldape KD, Sulman EP, Rao G, McCutcheon IE, Cahill DP (2014) IDH1 mutant malignant astrocytomas are more amenable to surgical resection and have a survival benefit associated with maximal surgical resection. Neuro-Oncol 16:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not159CrossRefPubMed Beiko J, Suki D, Hess KR, Fox BD, Cheung V, Cabral M, Shonka N, Gilbert MR, Sawaya R, Prabhu SS, Weinberg J, Lang FF, Aldape KD, Sulman EP, Rao G, McCutcheon IE, Cahill DP (2014) IDH1 mutant malignant astrocytomas are more amenable to surgical resection and have a survival benefit associated with maximal surgical resection. Neuro-Oncol 16:81–91. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​neuonc/​not159CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chaichana KL, Jusue-Torres I, Navarro-Ramirez R, Raza SM, Pascual-Gallego M, Ibrahim A, Hernandez-Hermann M, Gomez L, Ye X, Weingart JD, Olivi A, Blakeley J, Gallia GL, Lim M, Brem H, Quinones-Hinojosa A (2014) Establishing percent resection and residual volume thresholds affecting survival and recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed intracranial glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol 16:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not137CrossRefPubMed Chaichana KL, Jusue-Torres I, Navarro-Ramirez R, Raza SM, Pascual-Gallego M, Ibrahim A, Hernandez-Hermann M, Gomez L, Ye X, Weingart JD, Olivi A, Blakeley J, Gallia GL, Lim M, Brem H, Quinones-Hinojosa A (2014) Establishing percent resection and residual volume thresholds affecting survival and recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed intracranial glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol 16:113–122. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​neuonc/​not137CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Coburger J, Scheuerle A, Kapapa T, Engelke J, Thal DR, Wirtz CR, König R (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of linear array intraoperative ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery: a comparative study with high field intraoperative MRI and conventional sector array ultrasound. Neurosurg Rev 38:499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-015-0627-1CrossRefPubMed Coburger J, Scheuerle A, Kapapa T, Engelke J, Thal DR, Wirtz CR, König R (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of linear array intraoperative ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery: a comparative study with high field intraoperative MRI and conventional sector array ultrasound. Neurosurg Rev 38:499–509. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10143-015-0627-1CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, the PRISMA-DTA Group, Clifford T, Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Hooft L, Hunt HA, Hyde CJ, Korevaar DA, Leeflang MMG, Macaskill P, Reitsma JB, Rodin R, Rutjes AWS, Salameh J-P, Stevens A, Takwoingi Y, Tonelli M, Weeks L, Whiting P, Willis BH (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163CrossRefPubMed McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, the PRISMA-DTA Group, Clifford T, Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Hooft L, Hunt HA, Hyde CJ, Korevaar DA, Leeflang MMG, Macaskill P, Reitsma JB, Rodin R, Rutjes AWS, Salameh J-P, Stevens A, Takwoingi Y, Tonelli M, Weeks L, Whiting P, Willis BH (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2017.​19163CrossRefPubMed
39.
41.
go back to reference Renovanz M, Hickmann A-K, Henkel C, Nadji-Ohl M, Hopf N (2014) Navigated versus non-navigated intraoperative ultrasound: is there any impact on the extent of resection of high-grade gliomas? A retrospective clinical analysis. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg 75:224–230. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356486CrossRef Renovanz M, Hickmann A-K, Henkel C, Nadji-Ohl M, Hopf N (2014) Navigated versus non-navigated intraoperative ultrasound: is there any impact on the extent of resection of high-grade gliomas? A retrospective clinical analysis. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg 75:224–230. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0033-1356486CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Riva M, Hennersperger C, Milletari F, Katouzian A, Pessina F, Gutierrez-Becker B, Castellano A, Navab N, Bello L (2017) 3D intra-operative ultrasound and MR image guidance: pursuing an ultrasound-based management of brainshift to enhance neuronavigation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:1711–1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1578-5CrossRefPubMed Riva M, Hennersperger C, Milletari F, Katouzian A, Pessina F, Gutierrez-Becker B, Castellano A, Navab N, Bello L (2017) 3D intra-operative ultrasound and MR image guidance: pursuing an ultrasound-based management of brainshift to enhance neuronavigation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:1711–1725. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11548-017-1578-5CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Šteňo A, Hollý V, Mendel P, Šteňová V, Petričková Ľ, Timárová G, Jezberová M, Belan V, Rychlý B, Šurkala J, Šteňo J (2018) Navigated 3D–ultrasound versus conventional neuronavigation during awake resections of eloquent low-grade gliomas: a comparative study at a single institution. Acta Neurochir 160:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3377-8CrossRefPubMed Šteňo A, Hollý V, Mendel P, Šteňová V, Petričková Ľ, Timárová G, Jezberová M, Belan V, Rychlý B, Šurkala J, Šteňo J (2018) Navigated 3D–ultrasound versus conventional neuronavigation during awake resections of eloquent low-grade gliomas: a comparative study at a single institution. Acta Neurochir 160:331–342. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00701-017-3377-8CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Toms SA, Lin W-C, Weil RJ, Johnson MD, Jansen ED, Mahadevan-Jansen A (2005) Intraoperative optical spectroscopy identifies infiltrating glioma margins with high sensitivity. Neurosurgery 57:382–391 discussion 382-391CrossRefPubMed Toms SA, Lin W-C, Weil RJ, Johnson MD, Jansen ED, Mahadevan-Jansen A (2005) Intraoperative optical spectroscopy identifies infiltrating glioma margins with high sensitivity. Neurosurgery 57:382–391 discussion 382-391CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability of intraoperative ultrasound in detecting tumor residual after brain diffuse glioma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Gianluca Trevisi
Paolo Barbone
Giorgio Treglia
Maria Vittoria Mattoli
Annunziato Mangiola
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neurosurgical Review / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Electronic ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01160-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Neurosurgical Review 5/2020 Go to the issue