Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Lasers in Medical Science 8/2021

01-10-2021 | Keratomileusis | Original Article

Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia

Authors: Mingna Liu, Weiyun Shi, Xin Liu, Na Li, Tong Chen, Hua Gao

Published in: Lasers in Medical Science | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative corneal biomechanics and assess the influence factors after femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia. In this retrospective study, patients who completed 1-year follow-up were included. The corneal biomechanical parameters, including deformation amplitude ratio 2.0 mm (DA ratio 2.0 mm), integrated inverse radius (IntInv Rad), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), and Ambrosio relational thickness through the horizontal meridian (ARTh), were measured with Corvis STII. We also investigated the relationship between these biomechanics and preoperative or intraoperative variables. Thirty eyes had FS-LASIK and 30 eyes had LASEK. The changes in DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, and SP-A1 after surgery were significantly smaller in the LASEK group than in the FS-LASIK group, while the change in the ARTh was not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were detected in the mean values of postoperative DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, and SP-A1 between LASEK and FS-LASIK, while significant difference was detected in the mean value of postoperative ARTh. There was a significant correlation between the resident stromal bed thickness and the postoperative DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, or SP-A1. The postoperative ARTh has shown significant correlation with postoperative central corneal thickness and the amount of myopic correction. The effect of LASEK on corneal biomechanics was smaller than FS-LASIK when the same central corneal thickness was consumed. LASEK may be performed with a lower risk of postoperative corneal ectasia than FS-LASIK.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tataru CP (2017) The current state of refractive surgery. Rom J Ophthalmol 61:237–238CrossRef Tataru CP (2017) The current state of refractive surgery. Rom J Ophthalmol 61:237–238CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Woreta FA, Gupta A, Hochstetler B, Bower KS (2013) Management of postphotorefractive keratectomy pain. Surv Ophthalmol 58:529–535CrossRef Woreta FA, Gupta A, Hochstetler B, Bower KS (2013) Management of postphotorefractive keratectomy pain. Surv Ophthalmol 58:529–535CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bailey MD, Zadnik K (2007) Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers. Cornea 26:246–254CrossRef Bailey MD, Zadnik K (2007) Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers. Cornea 26:246–254CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Slade SG (2007) The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization of corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18:314–317CrossRef Slade SG (2007) The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization of corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18:314–317CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W (2019) Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 19:167CrossRef Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W (2019) Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 19:167CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:127–137CrossRef Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:127–137CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Uzbek AK, Kamburoğlu G, Mahmoud AM, Roberts CJ (2011) Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation. Curr Eye Res 36:614–619CrossRef Uzbek AK, Kamburoğlu G, Mahmoud AM, Roberts CJ (2011) Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation. Curr Eye Res 36:614–619CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Garcia-Porta N, Fernandes P, Queiros A, Salgado-Borges J, Parafita-Mato M, González-Méijome JM (2014) Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques. ISRN Ophthalmol 4:724546 Garcia-Porta N, Fernandes P, Queiros A, Salgado-Borges J, Parafita-Mato M, González-Méijome JM (2014) Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques. ISRN Ophthalmol 4:724546
9.
go back to reference Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL (2007) Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1371–1375CrossRef Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL (2007) Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1371–1375CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Kang DSY, Lopes BT, Morenghi E et al (2016) Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg 32:550–561CrossRef Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Kang DSY, Lopes BT, Morenghi E et al (2016) Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg 32:550–561CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Luz A, Faria-Correia F, Salom~ao MQ, Lopes BT, Ambrósio R Jr (2016) Corneal biomechanics: where are we? [editorial]. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:97–98CrossRef Luz A, Faria-Correia F, Salom~ao MQ, Lopes BT, Ambrósio R Jr (2016) Corneal biomechanics: where are we? [editorial]. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:97–98CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E et al (2016) Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg 32:803–810CrossRef Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E et al (2016) Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg 32:803–810CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mohamed TA, Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M (2011) Post-laser assisted in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth and its relation to pretreatment refractive error. Cornea 30:550–552CrossRef Mohamed TA, Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M (2011) Post-laser assisted in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth and its relation to pretreatment refractive error. Cornea 30:550–552CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vaddavalli PK, Yoo SH, Diakonis VF, Canto AP, Shah NV, Haddock LJ et al (2013) Femtosecond laser-assisted retreatment for residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1241–1247CrossRef Vaddavalli PK, Yoo SH, Diakonis VF, Canto AP, Shah NV, Haddock LJ et al (2013) Femtosecond laser-assisted retreatment for residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1241–1247CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Masud M, Linn SH, Ronquillo Y, Hoopes PC Sr (2018) Surgical options for retreatment after small-incision lenticule extraction: advantages and disadvantages. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1384–1389CrossRef Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Masud M, Linn SH, Ronquillo Y, Hoopes PC Sr (2018) Surgical options for retreatment after small-incision lenticule extraction: advantages and disadvantages. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1384–1389CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shah R (2019) History and results; indications and contraindications of SMILE compared with LASIK. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 8:371–376CrossRef Shah R (2019) History and results; indications and contraindications of SMILE compared with LASIK. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 8:371–376CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Manche EE (2012) Prospective, randomized comparison of self-reported postoperative dry eye and visual fluctuation in LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 119:2220–2224CrossRef Murakami Y, Manche EE (2012) Prospective, randomized comparison of self-reported postoperative dry eye and visual fluctuation in LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 119:2220–2224CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F (2009) Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 28:765–769CrossRef Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F (2009) Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 28:765–769CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chen S, Chen D, Wang J, Lu F, Wang Q, Qu J (2010) Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK. J Refract Surg 26:279–288CrossRef Chen S, Chen D, Wang J, Lu F, Wang Q, Qu J (2010) Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK. J Refract Surg 26:279–288CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ryan DS, Coe CD, Howard RS, Edwards JD, Bower KS (2011) Corneal biomechanics following epi-LASIK. J Refract Surg 27:458–464CrossRef Ryan DS, Coe CD, Howard RS, Edwards JD, Bower KS (2011) Corneal biomechanics following epi-LASIK. J Refract Surg 27:458–464CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS (2017) Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1495–1503CrossRef Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS (2017) Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1495–1503CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ghoneim EM, Abd El-Ghany AA, Gab-Alla AA, Mohamed AE (2015) Biomechanical properties of the cornea after laser in-situ keratomileusis in myopic patients. J Egypt Ophthalmol Soc 108:198–201CrossRef Ghoneim EM, Abd El-Ghany AA, Gab-Alla AA, Mohamed AE (2015) Biomechanical properties of the cornea after laser in-situ keratomileusis in myopic patients. J Egypt Ophthalmol Soc 108:198–201CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kirwan C, O’Keefe M (2008) Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol 86:215–218CrossRef Kirwan C, O’Keefe M (2008) Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol 86:215–218CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X (2014) Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 30:310–318CrossRef Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X (2014) Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 30:310–318CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cao K, Liu L, Yu T, Chen F, Bai J, Liu T (2020) Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Lasers Med Sci 35:599–609CrossRef Cao K, Liu L, Yu T, Chen F, Bai J, Liu T (2020) Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Lasers Med Sci 35:599–609CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, Yoon EY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS (2009) Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1774–1788CrossRef Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, Yoon EY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS (2009) Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1774–1788CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yang K, Xu L, Fan Q, Gu Y, Song P, Zhang B et al (2020) Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes. Sci Rep 10:5676CrossRef Yang K, Xu L, Fan Q, Gu Y, Song P, Zhang B et al (2020) Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes. Sci Rep 10:5676CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yu A, Zhao W, Savini G, Huang Z, Bao F, Lu W et al (2015) Evaluation of central corneal thickness using corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyzer Corvis ST and comparison with Pentacam rotating scheimpflug system and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes. J Ophthalmol 2015:767012CrossRef Yu A, Zhao W, Savini G, Huang Z, Bao F, Lu W et al (2015) Evaluation of central corneal thickness using corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyzer Corvis ST and comparison with Pentacam rotating scheimpflug system and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes. J Ophthalmol 2015:767012CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fu D, Zhang ZY, Wang L, Zhou XT, Yu ZQ (2017) Refractive regression and changes in central corneal thickness three years after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for high myopia in eyes with thin corneas: a retrospective study. Semin Ophthalmol 32:631–641CrossRef Fu D, Zhang ZY, Wang L, Zhou XT, Yu ZQ (2017) Refractive regression and changes in central corneal thickness three years after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for high myopia in eyes with thin corneas: a retrospective study. Semin Ophthalmol 32:631–641CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ali NQ, Patel DV, McGhee CN (2014) Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:3651–3659CrossRef Ali NQ, Patel DV, McGhee CN (2014) Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:3651–3659CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Felletti M, Grasso L, Brusini P (2015) Corneal deformation parameters provided by the Corvis-ST pachy-tonometer in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 24:568–574CrossRef Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Felletti M, Grasso L, Brusini P (2015) Corneal deformation parameters provided by the Corvis-ST pachy-tonometer in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 24:568–574CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia
Authors
Mingna Liu
Weiyun Shi
Xin Liu
Na Li
Tong Chen
Hua Gao
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Electronic ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03320-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Lasers in Medical Science 8/2021 Go to the issue