Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 9/2022

31-05-2022 | Glioblastoma | Original Article

Recurrent glioblastoma: which treatment? A real-world study from the Neuro-oncology Unit “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute

Authors: Veronica Villani, Luca Prosperini, Mario Lecce, Antonio Tanzilli, Alessia Farneti, Dario Benincasa, Stefano Telera, Laura Marucci, Francesca Piludu, Andrea Pace

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 9/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The majority of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) experience disease progression. At recurrence, treatment options have limited efficacy. Many studies report a limited and short duration response rate. Although clinical trials represent the “gold standard” for providing evidence on efficacy of specific treatment strategies, real-world data can be considered more representative of the “real” GBM population.

Objective

To describe the management of GBM recurrence in a large real-world sample.

Methods

We analysed retrospectively the data stored in the database of the Neuro-oncology Unit, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. We considered only data of patients with histological diagnosis of GBM and disease recurrence during their follow-up. We excluded patients who did not receive treatment after the diagnosis.

Results

We analysed 422 patients (64% males, 36% females) with a mean age of 59.6 (range 16–87) years. At GBM recurrence, 135 (32.0%) patients underwent palliative care, and 287 (68.0%) underwent other treatments. Patients on palliative care were older, had a worse performance status, and a shorter time between GBM diagnosis and its recurrence. Patients who received chemotherapy in combination with other treatments (surgery and/or radiation therapy) at GBM recurrence had a longer survival than those in palliative care (p < 0.001). Surgery or radiation therapy alone did not have any effect on survival as compared with palliative care (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study confirms the importance of a multidisciplinary approach even at GBM recurrence, suggesting that combination treatments play a key role in management of disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2018) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol 20(suppl4):iv1–iv86CrossRef Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2018) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol 20(suppl4):iv1–iv86CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRef Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ronning PA, Helseth E, Meling TR, Johannesen TB (2012) A population-based study on the effect of temozolomide in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 14:1178–1184CrossRef Ronning PA, Helseth E, Meling TR, Johannesen TB (2012) A population-based study on the effect of temozolomide in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 14:1178–1184CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRef Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198CrossRef Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD (2004) Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro Oncol 6:227–235CrossRef Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD (2004) Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro Oncol 6:227–235CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tan AC, Ashley DM, López GY, Malinzak M, Friedman HS, Khasraw M (2020) Management of glioblastoma: state of the art and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin 70(4):299–312CrossRef Tan AC, Ashley DM, López GY, Malinzak M, Friedman HS, Khasraw M (2020) Management of glioblastoma: state of the art and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin 70(4):299–312CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bloch O, Han SJ, Cha S, Sun MZ, Aghi MK, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Parsa ATJ (2012) Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival: clinical article. Neurosurg 117(6):1032–1038CrossRef Bloch O, Han SJ, Cha S, Sun MZ, Aghi MK, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Parsa ATJ (2012) Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival: clinical article. Neurosurg 117(6):1032–1038CrossRef
9.
go back to reference McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Gathinji M, Attenello FJ, Than K, Olivi A, Weingart JD, Brem H, Quiñones-Hinojosa AR (2009) Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 110(1):156–162CrossRef McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Gathinji M, Attenello FJ, Than K, Olivi A, Weingart JD, Brem H, Quiñones-Hinojosa AR (2009) Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 110(1):156–162CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brandes A, Bartolotti M, Franceschi E (2013) Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: advantages and pitfalls. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 13(5):583–587CrossRef Brandes A, Bartolotti M, Franceschi E (2013) Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: advantages and pitfalls. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 13(5):583–587CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Franceschi E, Bartolotti M, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Sturiale C, Fioravanti A et al (2015) The effect of re-operation on survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Anticancer Res 35(3):1743–1748PubMed Franceschi E, Bartolotti M, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Sturiale C, Fioravanti A et al (2015) The effect of re-operation on survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Anticancer Res 35(3):1743–1748PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cabrera AR, Kirkpatrick JP, Fiveash JB, Shih HA, Koay EJ, Lutz S et al (2016) Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol l6(4):217–225CrossRef Cabrera AR, Kirkpatrick JP, Fiveash JB, Shih HA, Koay EJ, Lutz S et al (2016) Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol l6(4):217–225CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lombardi G, De Salvo GL, Brandes AA, Eoli M, Rudà R, Faedi M et al (2019) Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(1):110–119CrossRef Lombardi G, De Salvo GL, Brandes AA, Eoli M, Rudà R, Faedi M et al (2019) Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(1):110–119CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Mazzocchi V, Fioravanti A, Brandes AA (2009) Treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma: pitfalls and future trends. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9(5):613–619CrossRef Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Mazzocchi V, Fioravanti A, Brandes AA (2009) Treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma: pitfalls and future trends. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9(5):613–619CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Prados MD, Levin VA, Yung WKJ (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. Clin Oncol 17(8):2572–2578 Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Prados MD, Levin VA, Yung WKJ (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. Clin Oncol 17(8):2572–2578
16.
go back to reference Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, Stupp R, Hegi ME, Jaeckle KA et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–91CrossRef Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, Stupp R, Hegi ME, Jaeckle KA et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–91CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wang J, Hu G, Quan X (2019) Analysis of the factors affect¬ing the prognosis of glioma patients. Open Med (Wars) 14:331–335CrossRef Wang J, Hu G, Quan X (2019) Analysis of the factors affect¬ing the prognosis of glioma patients. Open Med (Wars) 14:331–335CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reifenberger G, Weber RG, Riehmer V et al (2014) German Glioma Network. Molecular characterization of long-term survivors of glioblastoma using genome- and transcriptome-wide profiling. Int J Cancer 135:1822–1831CrossRef Reifenberger G, Weber RG, Riehmer V et al (2014) German Glioma Network. Molecular characterization of long-term survivors of glioblastoma using genome- and transcriptome-wide profiling. Int J Cancer 135:1822–1831CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hartmann C, Hentschel B, Simon M et al (2013) German Glioma Network. Long-term survival in primary glioblastoma with versus without isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations. Clin Cancer Res 19:5146–5157CrossRef Hartmann C, Hentschel B, Simon M et al (2013) German Glioma Network. Long-term survival in primary glioblastoma with versus without isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations. Clin Cancer Res 19:5146–5157CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hau P, Koch D, Hundsberger T, Marg E, Bauer B, Rudolph R et al (2007) Safety and feasibility of long-term temozolomide treatment in patients with high-grade glioma. Neurology 68:688–690 CrossRef Hau P, Koch D, Hundsberger T, Marg E, Bauer B, Rudolph R et al (2007) Safety and feasibility of long-term temozolomide treatment in patients with high-grade glioma. Neurology 68:688–690 CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Poelen J, Prick MJ, Jeuken JW, Wesseling P, Bernsen HJ (2009) Sixyear survival after prolonged temozolomide treatment in a 30-year-old patient with glioblastoma. Acta Neurol Belg 109:238–242PubMed Poelen J, Prick MJ, Jeuken JW, Wesseling P, Bernsen HJ (2009) Sixyear survival after prolonged temozolomide treatment in a 30-year-old patient with glioblastoma. Acta Neurol Belg 109:238–242PubMed
23.
go back to reference Ziobro M, Rolski J, Grela-Wojewoda A, Zygulska A, Niemiec M (2008) Effects of palliative treatment with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas. Neurol Neurochir Pol 42:210PubMed Ziobro M, Rolski J, Grela-Wojewoda A, Zygulska A, Niemiec M (2008) Effects of palliative treatment with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas. Neurol Neurochir Pol 42:210PubMed
24.
go back to reference Keime-Guibert F, Chinot O, Taillandier L, Cartalat-Carel S, Frenay M, Kantor G et al (2007) Radiotherapy for glioblastoma in the elderly. N Engl J Med 356(15):1527–35CrossRef Keime-Guibert F, Chinot O, Taillandier L, Cartalat-Carel S, Frenay M, Kantor G et al (2007) Radiotherapy for glioblastoma in the elderly. N Engl J Med 356(15):1527–35CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B et al (2015) MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma:the DIRECTOR Trial. Clin Cancer Res 21:2057–2064CrossRef Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B et al (2015) MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma:the DIRECTOR Trial. Clin Cancer Res 21:2057–2064CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28:1168–1174CrossRef Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28:1168–1174CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jungk C, Chatziaslanidou D, Ahmadi R et al (2016) Chemotherapy with BCNU in recurrent glioma: analysis of clinical outcome and side effects in chemotherapy-naïve patients. BMC Cancer 16:81CrossRef Jungk C, Chatziaslanidou D, Ahmadi R et al (2016) Chemotherapy with BCNU in recurrent glioma: analysis of clinical outcome and side effects in chemotherapy-naïve patients. BMC Cancer 16:81CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Carvalho BF, Fernandes AC, Almeida DS et al (2015) Second-line chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a 2-cohort study. Oncol Res Treat 38:348–354CrossRef Carvalho BF, Fernandes AC, Almeida DS et al (2015) Second-line chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a 2-cohort study. Oncol Res Treat 38:348–354CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schmidt F, Fischer J, Herrlinger U, Dietz K, Dichgans J, Weller M (2006) PCV chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology 66:587–589CrossRef Schmidt F, Fischer J, Herrlinger U, Dietz K, Dichgans J, Weller M (2006) PCV chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology 66:587–589CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Silvani A, Gaviani P, Lamperti E et al (2011) Lecture: fotemustine in brain tumors. Neurol Sci 2 Suppl2:S255-7CrossRef Silvani A, Gaviani P, Lamperti E et al (2011) Lecture: fotemustine in brain tumors. Neurol Sci 2 Suppl2:S255-7CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Preusser M, de Ribaupierre S, Wohrer A et al (2011) Current concepts and management of glioblastoma. Ann Neurol 70:9–21CrossRef Preusser M, de Ribaupierre S, Wohrer A et al (2011) Current concepts and management of glioblastoma. Ann Neurol 70:9–21CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Guyotat J, Signorelli F, Frappaz D, Madarassy G, Ricci AC, Bret P (2000) Is reoperation for recurrence of glioblastoma justified? Oncol Rep 7(4):899–904PubMed Guyotat J, Signorelli F, Frappaz D, Madarassy G, Ricci AC, Bret P (2000) Is reoperation for recurrence of glioblastoma justified? Oncol Rep 7(4):899–904PubMed
33.
go back to reference McNamara MG, Lwin Z, Jiang H, Templeton AJ, Zadeh G, Bernstein M, Chung C, Millar BA, Laperriere N, Mason WP (2014) Factors impacting survival following second surgery in patients with glioblastoma in the temozolomide treatment era, incorporating neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and time to first progression. J Neurooncol 17(1):147–152CrossRef McNamara MG, Lwin Z, Jiang H, Templeton AJ, Zadeh G, Bernstein M, Chung C, Millar BA, Laperriere N, Mason WP (2014) Factors impacting survival following second surgery in patients with glioblastoma in the temozolomide treatment era, incorporating neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and time to first progression. J Neurooncol 17(1):147–152CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Recurrent glioblastoma: which treatment? A real-world study from the Neuro-oncology Unit “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute
Authors
Veronica Villani
Luca Prosperini
Mario Lecce
Antonio Tanzilli
Alessia Farneti
Dario Benincasa
Stefano Telera
Laura Marucci
Francesca Piludu
Andrea Pace
Publication date
31-05-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue 9/2022
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06172-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2022

Neurological Sciences 9/2022 Go to the issue