Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Original Article

Abdominal wall reconstruction with biosynthetic absorbable mesh after infected prosthesis explantation: single stage is better than two-stage approach of chronic mesh infection

Authors: J. Bueno-Lledó, M. Ceno, C. Pérez-Alonso, J. Martinez-Hoed, S. Pous-Serrano

Published in: Hernia | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of surgical management of chronic mesh infection (CMI) after abdominal wall hernia repair (AWHR) in single-stage approach (complete removal of infected prosthesis and simultaneous replacement with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh or BAM group), comparing results with two-stage treatment (complete mesh excision and abdominal wall repair with synthetic mesh after several months or SPM group).

Methods

Retrospective comparative study of all patients who underwent surgery for CMI between January 2006 and January 2019 at a tertiary center. We compared results in terms of epidemiological data, hernia and prosthesis characteristics, surgical and postoperative variables of both two groups.

Results

Over the 13-year study period, 2791 AWHR was performed at our hospital; the overall CMI rate was 2.5%. Of 71 patients, 30 (42.2%) were in BAM group and 41 (57.8%) in SPM group. The median cumulative operative time (252 min versus 132 min) and length of stay (16.6 days versus 6.2 days) were significatively longer in SPM group compared with BAM group, due to the need of two surgical procedures. There were a higher number of postoperative complications in SPM group (p = 0.002), some of them grade III. With mean follow-up of 36.5 months (range 21–59), there were no significant differences in terms of overall hernia recurrence and mesh reinfection in both groups.

Conclusion

The use of a poly-4-hydroxybutyrate resorbable mesh in single-stage management of CMI may be a safe and better option than two-stage approach, although more studies are needed to confirm our results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown RH, Subramanian A, Hwang CS et al (2013) Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 205:182–187CrossRefPubMed Brown RH, Subramanian A, Hwang CS et al (2013) Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 205:182–187CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Plymale MA, Davenport DL, Walsh-Blackmore S et al (2020) Costs and complications associated with infected mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 21(4):344–349CrossRef Plymale MA, Davenport DL, Walsh-Blackmore S et al (2020) Costs and complications associated with infected mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 21(4):344–349CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pande T, Naidu CS (2020) Mesh infection in cases of polypropylene mesh hernioplasty. Hernia 24(4):849–856CrossRefPubMed Pande T, Naidu CS (2020) Mesh infection in cases of polypropylene mesh hernioplasty. Hernia 24(4):849–856CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Buell JF, Sigmon D, Ducoin C et al (2017) Initial experience with biologic polymer scaffold (poly-4-hydroxybuturate) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Ann Surg 266(1):185–188CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Sigmon D, Ducoin C et al (2017) Initial experience with biologic polymer scaffold (poly-4-hydroxybuturate) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Ann Surg 266(1):185–188CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rognoni C, Bassi UA, Cataldo M et al (2018) Budget impact analysis of a biosynthetic mesh for incisional hernia repair. Clin Ther 40(11):1830–1844.e4CrossRefPubMed Rognoni C, Bassi UA, Cataldo M et al (2018) Budget impact analysis of a biosynthetic mesh for incisional hernia repair. Clin Ther 40(11):1830–1844.e4CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Guillion JF, Palot JP (2012) Abdominal wall incisional hernias: Infected prosthesis: treatment and prevention. J Visc Surg 149:20–31CrossRef Guillion JF, Palot JP (2012) Abdominal wall incisional hernias: Infected prosthesis: treatment and prevention. J Visc Surg 149:20–31CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shubinets V, Carney MJ, Colen DL et al (2018) Management of infected mesh after abdominal hernia repair: systematic review and single-institution experience. Ann Plast Surg 80(2):145–153CrossRefPubMed Shubinets V, Carney MJ, Colen DL et al (2018) Management of infected mesh after abdominal hernia repair: systematic review and single-institution experience. Ann Plast Surg 80(2):145–153CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Boullenois H, Moszkowicz D, Poghosyan T et al (2016) Surgical management of chronic mesh infection following incisional hernia repair. J Visc Surg 153(6):461–464CrossRefPubMed Boullenois H, Moszkowicz D, Poghosyan T et al (2016) Surgical management of chronic mesh infection following incisional hernia repair. J Visc Surg 153(6):461–464CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Kaufmann R, Timmermans L, van Loon YT et al (2019) Repair of complex abdominal wall hernias with a cross-linked porcine acellular matrix: cross-sectional results of a Dutch cohort study. Int J Surg 65:120–127CrossRefPubMed Kaufmann R, Timmermans L, van Loon YT et al (2019) Repair of complex abdominal wall hernias with a cross-linked porcine acellular matrix: cross-sectional results of a Dutch cohort study. Int J Surg 65:120–127CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baldan N, Munegato G, Di Leo A et al (2020) Lessons learned from 227 biological meshes used for the surgical treatment of ventral abdominal defects. Hernia 24(1):57–65CrossRefPubMed Baldan N, Munegato G, Di Leo A et al (2020) Lessons learned from 227 biological meshes used for the surgical treatment of ventral abdominal defects. Hernia 24(1):57–65CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2013) Characterization of the mechanical strength, resorption properties, and histologic characteristics of a fully absorbable material (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-PHASIX Mesh) in a porcine model of hernia repair. ISRN Surg 28(2013):238067 Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2013) Characterization of the mechanical strength, resorption properties, and histologic characteristics of a fully absorbable material (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-PHASIX Mesh) in a porcine model of hernia repair. ISRN Surg 28(2013):238067
14.
go back to reference Scott JR, Deeken CR, Martindale RG et al (2016) Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 30:3691–3701CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scott JR, Deeken CR, Martindale RG et al (2016) Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 30:3691–3701CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Williams SF, Rizk S, Martin DP (2013) Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB): a new generation of resorbable medical devices for tissue repair and regeneration. Biomed Tech 58(5):439–452CrossRef Williams SF, Rizk S, Martin DP (2013) Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB): a new generation of resorbable medical devices for tissue repair and regeneration. Biomed Tech 58(5):439–452CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Miserez M, Jairam AP, Boersema GSA et al (2019) Resorbable synthetic meshes for abdominal wall defects in preclinical setting: a literature review. J Surg Res 237:67–75CrossRefPubMed Miserez M, Jairam AP, Boersema GSA et al (2019) Resorbable synthetic meshes for abdominal wall defects in preclinical setting: a literature review. J Surg Res 237:67–75CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Petro CC, Rosen MJ (2018) A current review of long-acting resorbable meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3 Suppl):84S–91SCrossRefPubMed Petro CC, Rosen MJ (2018) A current review of long-acting resorbable meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3 Suppl):84S–91SCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Birolini C, de Miranda JS, Tanaka EY et al (2020) The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma—a long-term prospective clinical trial. Hernia 24(2):307–323CrossRefPubMed Birolini C, de Miranda JS, Tanaka EY et al (2020) The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma—a long-term prospective clinical trial. Hernia 24(2):307–323CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Warren J, Desai SS, Boswell ND et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field. J Am Coll Surg 230(4):405–413CrossRefPubMed Warren J, Desai SS, Boswell ND et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field. J Am Coll Surg 230(4):405–413CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kao AM, Arnold MR, Augenstein VA et al (2018) Prevention and treatment strategies for mesh infection in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:149S–155SCrossRefPubMed Kao AM, Arnold MR, Augenstein VA et al (2018) Prevention and treatment strategies for mesh infection in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:149S–155SCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gachabayov M, Gogna S, George G et al (2020) Recurrence of infection and hernia following partial versus complete removal of infected hernia mesh: a systematic review and cohort meta-analysis. Hernia 24(3):433–439CrossRefPubMed Gachabayov M, Gogna S, George G et al (2020) Recurrence of infection and hernia following partial versus complete removal of infected hernia mesh: a systematic review and cohort meta-analysis. Hernia 24(3):433–439CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kao AM, Arnold MR, Otero J et al (2020) Comparison of outcomes after partial versus complete mesh excision. Ann Surg 272(1):177–182CrossRefPubMed Kao AM, Arnold MR, Otero J et al (2020) Comparison of outcomes after partial versus complete mesh excision. Ann Surg 272(1):177–182CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bueno-Lledo J, Torregrosa-Gallud A, Carreño-Saenz O et al (2017) Partial versus complete removal of the infected mesh after abdominal wall hernia repair. Am J Surg 214(1):47–52CrossRefPubMed Bueno-Lledo J, Torregrosa-Gallud A, Carreño-Saenz O et al (2017) Partial versus complete removal of the infected mesh after abdominal wall hernia repair. Am J Surg 214(1):47–52CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Messa CA, Kozak G, Broach RB et al (2019) When the mesh goes away: an analysis of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh for complex hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(11):e2576CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Messa CA, Kozak G, Broach RB et al (2019) When the mesh goes away: an analysis of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh for complex hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(11):e2576CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Pakula A, Skinner R (2020) Outcomes of open complex ventral hernia repairs with retromuscular placement of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate bioabsorbable mesh. Surg Innov 27(1):32–37CrossRefPubMed Pakula A, Skinner R (2020) Outcomes of open complex ventral hernia repairs with retromuscular placement of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate bioabsorbable mesh. Surg Innov 27(1):32–37CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Abdominal wall reconstruction with biosynthetic absorbable mesh after infected prosthesis explantation: single stage is better than two-stage approach of chronic mesh infection
Authors
J. Bueno-Lledó
M. Ceno
C. Pérez-Alonso
J. Martinez-Hoed
S. Pous-Serrano
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02309-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Hernia 4/2021 Go to the issue