Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 6/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Laparotomy | Original Article

Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model

Authors: Y. Yurtkap, F. P. J. den Hartog, W. van Weteringen, J. Jeekel, G. J. Kleinrensink, J. F. Lange

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

After closure of laparotomies, sutures may pull through tissue due to too high intra-abdominal pressure or suture tension, resulting in burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The objective of this study was to measure the suture tension in small and large bites with a new suture material.

Methods

Closure of the linea alba was performed with small bites (i.e., 5 mm between two consecutive stitches and 5 mm distance from the incision) and large bites (i.e., 10 mm × 10 mm) with Duramesh™ size 0 (2 mm) and PDS II 2-0 in 24 experiments on six porcine abdominal walls. The abdominal wall was fixated on an artificial computer-controlled insufflatable abdomen, known as the ‘AbdoMan’. A custom-made suture tension sensor was placed in the middle of the incision.

Results

The suture tension was significantly lower with the small bites technique and Duramesh™ when compared with large bites (small bites 0.12 N (IQR 0.07–0.19) vs. large bites 0.57 N (IQR 0.23–0.92), p  < 0.025). This significant difference was also found in favour of the small bites with PDS II 2-0 (p  < 0.038). No macroscopic tissue failure was seen during or after the experiments.

Conclusion

Closure of the abdominal wall with the small bites technique and Duramesh was more efficient in dividing suture tension across the incision when compared to large bites. However, suture tension compared to a conventional suture material was not significantly different, contradicting an advantage of the new suture material in the prevention of burst abdomen and incisional hernia during the acute, postoperative phase.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Ramshorst GH et al (2010) Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg 34(1):20–27CrossRef van Ramshorst GH et al (2010) Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg 34(1):20–27CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jairam AP et al (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390(10094):567–576CrossRef Jairam AP et al (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390(10094):567–576CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Poulose BK et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183CrossRef Poulose BK et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Ramshorst GH et al (2012) Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 204(2):144–150CrossRef van Ramshorst GH et al (2012) Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 204(2):144–150CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Henriksen NA et al (2018) Meta-analysis on materials and techniques for laparotomy closure: the match review. World J Surg 42(6):1666–1678CrossRef Henriksen NA et al (2018) Meta-analysis on materials and techniques for laparotomy closure: the match review. World J Surg 42(6):1666–1678CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Deerenberg EB et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260CrossRef Deerenberg EB et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Klink CD et al (2011) Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model. BMC Surg 11:36CrossRef Klink CD et al (2011) Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model. BMC Surg 11:36CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Souza JM et al (2015) In vivo evaluation of a novel mesh suture design for abdominal wall closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):322e–e330CrossRef Souza JM et al (2015) In vivo evaluation of a novel mesh suture design for abdominal wall closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):322e–e330CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vogels RR et al (2017) Biocompatibility and biomechanical analysis of elastic TPU threads as new suture material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105(1):99–106CrossRef Vogels RR et al (2017) Biocompatibility and biomechanical analysis of elastic TPU threads as new suture material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105(1):99–106CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nout E et al (2007) Creep behavior of commonly used suture materials in abdominal wall surgery. J Surg Res 138(1):51–55CrossRef Nout E et al (2007) Creep behavior of commonly used suture materials in abdominal wall surgery. J Surg Res 138(1):51–55CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kroese LF et al (2017) The 'AbdoMAN': an artificial abdominal wall simulator for biomechanical studies on laparotomy closure techniques. Hernia 21(5):783–791CrossRef Kroese LF et al (2017) The 'AbdoMAN': an artificial abdominal wall simulator for biomechanical studies on laparotomy closure techniques. Hernia 21(5):783–791CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dumanian GA, Tulaimat A, Dumanian ZP (2015) Experimental study of the characteristics of a novel mesh suture. Br J Surg 102(10):1285–1292CrossRef Dumanian GA, Tulaimat A, Dumanian ZP (2015) Experimental study of the characteristics of a novel mesh suture. Br J Surg 102(10):1285–1292CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chan RW, Titze IR (2003) Effect of postmortem changes and freezing on the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 31(4):482–491CrossRef Chan RW, Titze IR (2003) Effect of postmortem changes and freezing on the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 31(4):482–491CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhang T et al (2018) Rotator cuff repair with a novel mesh suture: an ex vivo assessment of mechanical properties. J Orthop Res 36(3):987–992PubMed Zhang T et al (2018) Rotator cuff repair with a novel mesh suture: an ex vivo assessment of mechanical properties. J Orthop Res 36(3):987–992PubMed
15.
go back to reference Israelsson LA, Jonsson T, Knutsson A (1996) Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Eur J Surg 162(8):605–609PubMed Israelsson LA, Jonsson T, Knutsson A (1996) Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Eur J Surg 162(8):605–609PubMed
16.
go back to reference Cooney GM et al (2018) Optimized wound closure using a biomechanical abdominal model. Br J Surg 105(4):395–400CrossRef Cooney GM et al (2018) Optimized wound closure using a biomechanical abdominal model. Br J Surg 105(4):395–400CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mioton LM, Dumanian GA (2018) Theoretic and evidence-based laparotomy closure with sutures and meshes. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3 Suppl):117S–124SCrossRef Mioton LM, Dumanian GA (2018) Theoretic and evidence-based laparotomy closure with sutures and meshes. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3 Suppl):117S–124SCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fischer L et al (2010) Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize? Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(4):445–450CrossRef Fischer L et al (2010) Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize? Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(4):445–450CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cooney GM et al (2017) The suture pullout characteristics of human and porcine linea alba. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 68:103–114CrossRef Cooney GM et al (2017) The suture pullout characteristics of human and porcine linea alba. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 68:103–114CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model
Authors
Y. Yurtkap
F. P. J. den Hartog
W. van Weteringen
J. Jeekel
G. J. Kleinrensink
J. F. Lange
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Hernia 6/2020 Go to the issue

Editor’s Corner

Editor’s corner