Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Hernia
Published in: Hernia 3/2020

Open Access 01-06-2020 | Laparotomy | Review

Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: F. A. Burns, E. G. Heywood, C. P. Challand, Matthew J. Lee

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Incisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review will assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement in emergency laparotomy.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42018109283). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included when a comparison was made between closure with prophylactic mesh and closure with a standard technique, reported using a comparative design (i.e. case–control, cohort or randomised trial), where the primary outcome was incisional hernia. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomised studies tool. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia rate was performed to estimate risk ratio using a random effects model (Mantel–Haenszel approach).

Results

332 studies were screened for eligibility, 29 full texts were reviewed and 2 non-randomised studies were included. Both studies were biased due to confounding factors, as closure technique was based on patient risk factors for incisional hernia. Both studies found significantly fewer incisional hernias in the mesh groups [3.2% vs 28.6% (p < 0.001) and 5.9% vs 33.3% (p = 0.0001)]. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia risk favoured prophylactic mesh closure [risk ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.6–0.35, p < 0.001)]. Neither study found an association between mesh and infection or enterocutaneous fistula.

Conclusion

This review found that there are limited data to assess the effect or safety profile of prophylactic mesh in the emergency laparotomy setting. The current data cannot reliably assess the use of mesh due to confounding factors, and a randomised controlled trial is required to address this important clinical question.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Ahn B-K (2012) Risk factors for incisional hernia and parastomal hernia after colorectal surgery. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:280–281CrossRef
2.
Fortelny RH (2018) Abdominal wall closure in elective midline laparotomy: the current recommendations. Front Surg 5:34CrossRef
3.
van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WCJ et al (2012) Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 204:144–150CrossRef
4.
Lowe JB, Lowe JB, Baty JD, Garza JR (2003) Risks associated with “components separation” for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1276–1283 (quiz 1284–5; discussion 1286–8) CrossRef
5.
Peponis T, Bohnen JD, Muse S, et al (2018) Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure in patients undergoing emergent laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 1
6.
Borab ZM, Shakir S, Lanni MA, Tecce MG, MacDonald J (2017) Hope WW (2017) Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 161:1149–1163CrossRef
7.
Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH et al (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390:567–576CrossRef
8.
Mingoli A, Puggioni A, Sgarzini G et al (1999) Incidence of incisional hernia following emergency abdominal surgery. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:449–453PubMed
9.
Saleem A-E-A, Abdallah H, Abdul Raheem O, Yousef M (2016) Rate of development of incisional hernia 1 year after urgent midline laparotomy. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 14:59CrossRef
10.
Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K et al (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19:1–24CrossRef
11.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRef
12.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRef
13.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919CrossRef
14.
Scholtes M, Kurmann A, Seiler CA et al (2012) Intraperitoneal mesh implantation for fascial dehiscence and open abdomen. World J Surg 36:1557–1561CrossRef
15.
Mozingo DW (2006) Multidisciplinary approach to abdominal wall reconstruction after decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome. Yearb Surg 2006:31–32CrossRef
16.
Wang TY, Elliott R, Low DW (2013) Damage control abdomen: single-stage reconstruction using a vicryl mesh buttress. Ann Plast Surg 70:324–330PubMed
17.
Fox N, Crutchfield M, LaChant M et al (2013) Early abdominal closure improves long-term outcomes after damage-control laparotomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75:854–858CrossRef
18.
Caro-Tarragó A, Olona-Casas C, Olona-Cabases M, Guillén VV (2014) Retracted: impact on quality of life of using an onlay mesh to prevent incisional hernia in midline laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 219:470–479CrossRef
19.
García-Ureña MÁ, López-Monclús J, Hernando LAB et al (2015) Randomized controlled trial of the use of a large-pore polypropylene mesh to prevent incisional hernia in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 261:876–881CrossRef
20.
Iesalnieks I, Baladov M, Ikhlawi K (2015) Reinforcement of fascial closure by polyglactin-mesh to prevent abdominal wound dehiscence following open colorectal surgery. In: Diseases of the colon and rectum. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp E162–E162
21.
Timmermans L, Eker HH, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation to prevent incisional hernia. Ann Surg 261:276–281CrossRef
22.
Gainant A, Boudinet F, Cubertafond P (1989) Prevention of postoperative wound dehiscence in high risk patients. A randomized comparison of internally applied resorbable polyglactin 910 mesh and externally applied polyamide fiber mesh. Int Surg 74:55–57PubMed
23.
Yüce K (1994) Retention mesh: an alternative to retention sutures. Eur J Surg 160:641–642PubMed
24.
Argudo N, Pilar Iskra M, Pera M et al (2017) The use of an algorithm for prophylactic mesh use in high risk patients reduces the incidence of incisional hernia following laparotomy for colorectal cancer resection. Cirug Española (English Edition) 95:222–228CrossRef
25.
de la Portilla F, de la Portilla F, Flikier B et al (2008) Estudio aleatorizado sobre la utilización de mallas reabsorbibles para la prevención de la evisceración en la cirugía colorrectal. Cirug Española 83:12–17CrossRef
26.
Haeder L, Jähne J (2013) Prophylactic mesh implantation in high-risk patients undergoing laparotomy. Chirurg 84:599CrossRef
27.
Paye F, Rongère C, Gendreau D, Lenriot JP (1992) Intraperitoneal resorbable mesh in the prevention of postoperative wound dehiscence. A comparative study. In, Ann Chirurg, pp 518–522
28.
Robin-Lersundi A, Abella Álvarez A, Cruz Cidoncha A, López-Monclús J, Gordo Vi-dal F, García-Ureña MA (2013) Severe acute pancreatitis and abdominal compartment syndrome: treatment in the form of decompressive laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure with a expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. Med Intensiva 37:301–302CrossRef
29.
Rodríguez-Hermosa JI, Codina-Cazador A, Ruiz B et al (2005) Factores de riesgo de dehiscencia aguda de la pared abdominal tras laparotomía en adultos. Cirug Española 77:280–286CrossRef
30.
Gürleyik G (2001) Factors affecting disruption of surgical abdominal incisions in early postoperative period. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg 7:96–99
31.
Jairam A, Lopez Cano M, Garcia Alamino J (2018) Hernia: world journal of hernia and abdominal wall surgery. In: Fitzgibbons FJ, Miserez M (eds) 2018 International hernia congress. Springer, Berlin, p S49
32.
Jairam A, Timmermans L, Jeekel H (2017) 18th annual hernia Repair. In: Suppl 1. Springer, Berlin
33.
Dumanian G (2016) A novel mesh suture for laparotomy closure and hernia defect closure. In: 17th annual hernia repair, pp 1–138
34.
San Miguel C, Lopez J, Jimenez E (2017) Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy. In: Hernia: oral and video presentations, pp 139–273
35.
San Miguel Mendez C, Garcia-Urena M, Blazquez-Hernando L (2018) First long-term results reported on prophylactic mesh closure of midline laparotomies. In: 2018 international hernia congress. Springer, pp 1–204
36.
Kurmann A, Barnetta C, Candinas D, Beldi G (2013) Implantation of prophylactic nonabsorbable intraperitoneal mesh in patients with peritonitis is safe and feasible. World J Surg 37:1656–1660CrossRef
37.
Mathes SJ, Harlan Stone H (1975) Acute traumatic losses of abdominal wall substance. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 15:386–391CrossRef
38.
Brandt CP, McHenry CR, Jacobs DG et al (1995) Polypropylene mesh closure after emergency laparotomy: morbidity and outcome. Surgery 118:736–740 (discussion 740–1) CrossRef
39.
Mangus RS, Kubal CA, Tector AJ et al (2012) Closure of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal allograft in intestinal transplantation: intestinal transplant abdominal wall closure. Am J Transplant 12:S55–S59CrossRef
40.
Argudo N, Pereira JA, Sancho JJ et al (2014) Prophylactic synthetic mesh can be safely used to close emergency laparotomies, even in peritonitis. Surgery 156:1238–1244CrossRef
41.
42.
Payne R, Aldwinckle J, Ward S (2017) Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the use of prophylactic mesh to standard midline closure in the reduction of incisional herniae. Hernia 21:843–853CrossRef
43.
McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRef
44.
Majumder A, Winder JS, Wen Y et al (2016) Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery 160:828–838CrossRef
45.
Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:1254–1260CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
F. A. Burns
E. G. Heywood
C. P. Challand
Matthew J. Lee
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Hernia 3/2020 Go to the issue

Original Article

Long term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction using open component separation and biologic mesh in the liver, kidney, and small bowel transplant population

Original Article

Population-based rates of hernia surgery in Ghana

Original Article

The development and validation of risk-stratification models for short-term outcomes following contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction

Original Article

A 9-year experience study of single-port micro-laparoscopic repair of pediatric inguinal hernia using a simple needle

Original Article

Abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a national survey

Original Article

Risk factors for repeat hernia repair in women of childbearing age