Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Article

Long-term clinical, radiological, and histological follow-up after complex ventral incisional hernia repair using urinary bladder matrix graft reinforcement: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: K. C. Sasse, J.-H. Lambin, J. Gevorkian, C. Elliott, R. Afshar, A. Gardner, A. Mehta, R. Lambin, L. Peraza

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Complex ventral incisional hernia repair represents a challenging clinical condition in which biologically derived graft reinforcement is often utilized, but little long-term data inform that decision. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) has shown effectiveness in diverse clinical settings as durable reinforcement graft material, but it has not been studied over a long term in ventral incisional hernia repair. This study evaluates the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcome of complex incisional hernia repair using UBM reinforcement with 12–70 months of follow-up.

Methods

A single-arm, retrospective observational study of all ventral incisional hernia repairs utilizing UBM reinforcement over a 6-year time frame by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were assessed in long-term follow-up clinically and with the Carolina Comfort Scale. A subset of patients was assessed with abdominal wall ultrasound or CT scan. Three patients had abdominal wall fascial biopsies years after the incisional hernia repair with UBM graft, and the histology is analyzed.

Results

64 patients underwent repair of complex incisional hernias with UBM graft reinforcement by a single surgeon. 42 patients had concomitant procedures including large or small bowel resection, excision of infected mesh, evacuation of abscess or hematoma, cholecystectomy, or panniculectomy with abdominoplasty. 16 patients had ostomies at the time of repair. Median follow-up time is 36 months, with a range of 12–70 months. Nine patients (14%) have required surgical repair of a recurrent hernia, and a tenth patient has a recurrence that is managed non-surgically, for a total recurrence rate of 15.6% over the entire time frame. Median time to recurrence was 32 months, and a Kaplan–Meier freedom from recurrence curve is depicted. 28 patients have undergone ultrasound or CT assessments of the abdominal wall which demonstrate radiographic fascial integrity 12–70 months after repair. Three patients have been re-explored for unrelated reasons in the years following ventral incisional hernia repair with UBM, and full thickness fascial biopsies demonstrate a robust remodeling response histologically similar to native myofascial tissue. No patients have developed graft infection, fistulization to the graft, or required graft explantation. Carolina Comfort Scale assessment of 45 patients 3 years after the repair averaged 16 out of a possible 115.

Conclusion

In 64 patients undergoing complex ventral incisional hernia repair with UBM reinforcement, all have experienced successful resolution of complex clinical conditions and 15.6% of these repairs have recurred at a median follow-up of 3 years. Three full-thickness biopsies of the repaired fascia years later shed light on a promising remodeling response which may signal strength and durability comparable to native fascia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183CrossRefPubMed Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Burger JW (2004) Long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial of suture vs. mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–585PubMedPubMedCentral Burger JW (2004) Long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial of suture vs. mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–585PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
5.
go back to reference Hiles M, Rae D. Record, Ritchie, Altizer AM (2009) Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innovat 16(1):26–37CrossRef Hiles M, Rae D. Record, Ritchie, Altizer AM (2009) Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innovat 16(1):26–37CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carbonell AM et al (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):991CrossRefPubMed Carbonell AM et al (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):991CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hood K et al (2013) Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh. Am J Surg 205(3):322–328CrossRefPubMed Hood K et al (2013) Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh. Am J Surg 205(3):322–328CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gillern S, Bleier J (2014) Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27(4):162–171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillern S, Bleier J (2014) Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27(4):162–171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Bochicchio GV et al (2014) Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial. J Am Coll Surg 218(4):751CrossRefPubMed Bochicchio GV et al (2014) Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial. J Am Coll Surg 218(4):751CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schmidt E et al. (2014) Hiatal hernia repair with biologic mesh reinforcement reduces recurrence rate in small hiatal hernias: biologic mesh in small hiatal. Dis Esophagus 27(1):13–17CrossRefPubMed Schmidt E et al. (2014) Hiatal hernia repair with biologic mesh reinforcement reduces recurrence rate in small hiatal hernias: biologic mesh in small hiatal. Dis Esophagus 27(1):13–17CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nockolds CL, Hodde JP, Rooney PS (2014) Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair. BMC Surg 14(1):25–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nockolds CL, Hodde JP, Rooney PS (2014) Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair. BMC Surg 14(1):25–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
go back to reference Huntington CR, Cox TC et al (2016) Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis. Surgery 160(6):1517–1527CrossRefPubMed Huntington CR, Cox TC et al (2016) Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis. Surgery 160(6):1517–1527CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Badylak SF (2004) Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transplant Immunol 12(3):367–377CrossRef Badylak SF (2004) Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transplant Immunol 12(3):367–377CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liu L et al (2011) Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of xenogeneic (porcine) extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold for pelvic reconstruction. Int Urogynecol J 22(2):221–227CrossRefPubMed Liu L et al (2011) Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of xenogeneic (porcine) extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold for pelvic reconstruction. Int Urogynecol J 22(2):221–227CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sasse KC et al (2016) Hiatal hernia repair with novel biological graft reinforcement. JSLS 20(2):5–6CrossRef Sasse KC et al (2016) Hiatal hernia repair with novel biological graft reinforcement. JSLS 20(2):5–6CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mehta A et al (2017) Laparoscopic rectopexy with urinary bladder xenograft reinforcement. JSLS 21:1CrossRef Mehta A et al (2017) Laparoscopic rectopexy with urinary bladder xenograft reinforcement. JSLS 21:1CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ng N et al (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open fascial component separation for complex ventral hernia repair. Am Surg 81(7):714PubMed Ng N et al (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open fascial component separation for complex ventral hernia repair. Am Surg 81(7):714PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rosen MJ et al (2013) Evaluation of surgical outcomes of retro-rectus versus intraperitoneal reinforcement with bio-prosthetic mesh in the repair of contaminated ventral hernias. Hernia 17(1):31–35CrossRefPubMed Rosen MJ et al (2013) Evaluation of surgical outcomes of retro-rectus versus intraperitoneal reinforcement with bio-prosthetic mesh in the repair of contaminated ventral hernias. Hernia 17(1):31–35CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sasse KC, Lim DC, Brandt J (2012) Long-term durability and comfort of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. JSLS 16(3):380–386PubMedPubMedCentral Sasse KC, Lim DC, Brandt J (2012) Long-term durability and comfort of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. JSLS 16(3):380–386PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E et al (2013) Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair. Hernia 17(4):423–433CrossRefPubMed Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E et al (2013) Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair. Hernia 17(4):423–433CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18(1):7–17CrossRefPubMed Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18(1):7–17CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ko JH, Salvay DM et al (2009) Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, significantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):836–847CrossRefPubMed Ko JH, Salvay DM et al (2009) Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, significantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):836–847CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Slater NJ et al (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205(2):220–230CrossRefPubMed Slater NJ et al (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205(2):220–230CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nockolds CL, Jason P, Hodde (2014) and Paul S. Rooney. “Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair. BMC surgery 14(1):25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nockolds CL, Jason P, Hodde (2014) and Paul S. Rooney. “Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair. BMC surgery 14(1):25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Colavita PD, Zemlyak A, Burton P et al (2013) The expansive cost of wound complications after ventral hernia repair. Podium Presentation, American College of Surgeons Meeting in Washington DC Colavita PD, Zemlyak A, Burton P et al (2013) The expansive cost of wound complications after ventral hernia repair. Podium Presentation, American College of Surgeons Meeting in Washington DC
27.
go back to reference Nieponice A, Ciotola FF, Nachman F et al (2014) Patch esophagoplasty: esophageal reconstruction using biologic scaffolds. Ann Thorac Surg 97:283–288CrossRefPubMed Nieponice A, Ciotola FF, Nachman F et al (2014) Patch esophagoplasty: esophageal reconstruction using biologic scaffolds. Ann Thorac Surg 97:283–288CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hultman CS et al (2011) Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg 66(5):504–507CrossRefPubMed Hultman CS et al (2011) Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg 66(5):504–507CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term clinical, radiological, and histological follow-up after complex ventral incisional hernia repair using urinary bladder matrix graft reinforcement: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
K. C. Sasse
J.-H. Lambin
J. Gevorkian
C. Elliott
R. Afshar
A. Gardner
A. Mehta
R. Lambin
L. Peraza
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1830-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Hernia 6/2018 Go to the issue