Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up—a prospective, consecutive cohort study

Authors: G. Martis, L. Damjanovich

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The difficulties of treating recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias are well known in surgical practice. Several surgical techniques and various types of grafts are available for surgeons. This study presents a new surgical technique option together with the results of the 1-year follow-up.

Purpose

The primary aim of the study is to present the surgical technique of the procedure suitable for the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias. The secondary aim is to determine the recurrence rate and analyse the surgical complications. The tertiary aim is to present the quality of life test results performed 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery.

Patients and method

The authors evaluated the results of 36 recurrent and/or infected incisional hernia surgeries (11 men, average age 60.6 years; 25 women, average age 58.9 years) performed with their own surgical method in the framework of a tightly controlled, prospective, interventional and observational consecutive cohort study conducted between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013 at a university surgical department. The study evaluates the results of the 1-year follow-up period. All 36 patients had at least one recurrence of abdominal wall hernia; 12 of them also had concurrent infection of the synthetic graft and a complicating fistula. The mean BMI was 31.82 kg/m2 (25.2–43.5 kg/m2). The average size of the abdominal wall defect was 145.9 cm2 (59–275 cm2). The abdominal wall reconstruction was performed using an autologous, double-layer dermal flap. The grafts, which had been inserted during previous surgeries, were removed completely. The autologous dermal tissue was prepared using the flap harvested during dermolipectomy. The reconstruction was achieved using a tension-free technique. The essence of the abdominal wall reconstruction is the completion of the abdominal wall defect by a double-layer autologous dermal flap. The original abdominal wall defect was not closed by direct sutures. The quality of the prepared dermal flap was histologically evaluated. IAPMS (intra-abdominal pressure monitoring set) was applied to verify intra-abdominal pressure in the post-operative period. The result of the surgeries was assessed using a quality of life questionnaire.

Results

No recurrence of the abdominal wall hernia was registered during the 1-year follow-up period. Abdominal bulking was observed in case of three patients (8.3 %). Wound infection occurred in one patient (2.77 %) and skin dehiscence in two patients (5.55 %). Haematoma was registered in case of one patient (2.77 %) on the fifth post-operative day. Seroma formation occurred in case of eight patients (22.22 %), which required percutaneous tapping. A fistula formation was observed in one patient (2.77 %) 45 days after the surgery. The intra-abdominal pressure remained moderately elevated during the early post-operative period (9.65–5.76 mmHg on post-operative days 1 and 5). Reoperation was performed in one case due to haematoma. No fatality occurred.

Conclusions

The 1-year recurrence rate in case of the abdominal wall reconstruction using double-layer autologous dermal flap is favourable. Being compliant with the surgical technique developed, the procedure is safe to perform. The number of surgical site infections and fistula formations is low. Based on the questionnaires evaluated, all patients would choose this method instead of the previous reconstruction(s). The method is cost-effective. Based on the results, this procedure is feasible for the treatment of recurrent and/or infected abdominal wall, incisional ventral hernias in obese “high risk” patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deerenberg EB, Timmermann SL, Hogerzeil DP et al (2015) A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia. Hernia 19(1):89–101CrossRefPubMed Deerenberg EB, Timmermann SL, Hogerzeil DP et al (2015) A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia. Hernia 19(1):89–101CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference den Hartoq D, Dur AH, Tuinebrejer WE, Kreis RW (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD006438 den Hartoq D, Dur AH, Tuinebrejer WE, Kreis RW (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD006438
3.
go back to reference Bower C, Roth S (2013) Economics of abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am 93(5):1241–1253CrossRefPubMed Bower C, Roth S (2013) Economics of abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am 93(5):1241–1253CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Reynolds D, Davenport DL, Korosec RL, Roth JS (2013) Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 17(1):159–166CrossRefPubMed Reynolds D, Davenport DL, Korosec RL, Roth JS (2013) Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 17(1):159–166CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kindelis M (2010) One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomised study. Hernia 14(6):575–582CrossRefPubMed Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kindelis M (2010) One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomised study. Hernia 14(6):575–582CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Masden D, Felder JM, Iorio ML et al (2011) Abdominal wall reconstruction with inplantable meshes. J Long Term Eff Med Inplants 21(1):25–50CrossRef Masden D, Felder JM, Iorio ML et al (2011) Abdominal wall reconstruction with inplantable meshes. J Long Term Eff Med Inplants 21(1):25–50CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nicholas J, Slater B, van der Kolk Marion et al (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230CrossRef Nicholas J, Slater B, van der Kolk Marion et al (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beale EW, Hoxworth RE, Livingstone EH et al (2012) The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature. Am J Surg 204:510–517CrossRefPubMed Beale EW, Hoxworth RE, Livingstone EH et al (2012) The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature. Am J Surg 204:510–517CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Butler CE, Burns NK, Campbell KT et al (2010) Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 211:368–376CrossRefPubMed Butler CE, Burns NK, Campbell KT et al (2010) Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 211:368–376CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Lee L, Mata J, Landry T et al (2014) A systematic review of synthetic and biological materials for abdominal wall reinforcement in contaminated fields. Surg Endosc 28(9):2531–2546CrossRefPubMed Lee L, Mata J, Landry T et al (2014) A systematic review of synthetic and biological materials for abdominal wall reinforcement in contaminated fields. Surg Endosc 28(9):2531–2546CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Blatnik J, Jin J, Rosen M (2008) Abdominal hernia repair with bridging acellular dermal matrix—an expensive hernia sac. Am J Surg 196:47–50CrossRefPubMed Blatnik J, Jin J, Rosen M (2008) Abdominal hernia repair with bridging acellular dermal matrix—an expensive hernia sac. Am J Surg 196:47–50CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J et al (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J et al (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Yang F, Ji-Ye L, Rang L, Wen T (2015) Use of acellular dermal matrix combined with a component separation technique for repair of contaminated large ventral hernias: a possible ideal solution for this clinical challenge. Ann Surg 81(2):150–156 Yang F, Ji-Ye L, Rang L, Wen T (2015) Use of acellular dermal matrix combined with a component separation technique for repair of contaminated large ventral hernias: a possible ideal solution for this clinical challenge. Ann Surg 81(2):150–156
15.
go back to reference Miserez M, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Schumpelick V (2013) Hernia surgery and contamination: biological mesh and nothing else? Hernia 17(1):1CrossRefPubMed Miserez M, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Schumpelick V (2013) Hernia surgery and contamination: biological mesh and nothing else? Hernia 17(1):1CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland H, Neugebauer E et al (2001) Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts’s meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 386:65–73CrossRefPubMed Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland H, Neugebauer E et al (2001) Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts’s meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 386:65–73CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Otto J, Binnebösel M, Junge K, Jansen M, Dembinsky R, Schumpelick V, Schachtrupp A (2010) Harrahill’s technique: a simple screening test for intra-abdominal pressure measurement. Hernia 14(4):415–419CrossRefPubMed Otto J, Binnebösel M, Junge K, Jansen M, Dembinsky R, Schumpelick V, Schachtrupp A (2010) Harrahill’s technique: a simple screening test for intra-abdominal pressure measurement. Hernia 14(4):415–419CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Kohler A, Baldi G (2014) Recurrence after hernia surgery: complication or natural course? Chirurg 85(2):112–116CrossRefPubMed Kohler A, Baldi G (2014) Recurrence after hernia surgery: complication or natural course? Chirurg 85(2):112–116CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K et al (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24CrossRefPubMed Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K et al (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Harth HC, Krpata DM, Chawla A et al (2013) Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons. Hernia 17(1):13–20CrossRefPubMed Harth HC, Krpata DM, Chawla A et al (2013) Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons. Hernia 17(1):13–20CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J et al (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J et al (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chung L, Tse GH, O’Dwyer PJ (2014) Outcome of patients with chronic mesh infection following abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 18(5):701–704CrossRefPubMed Chung L, Tse GH, O’Dwyer PJ (2014) Outcome of patients with chronic mesh infection following abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 18(5):701–704CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Birolini C, de Mirinda JS, Utiyama EM, Rosslan S (2015) A retrospective review and observations over a 16-year clinical experience on the surgical treatment of chronic mesh infection. What about replacing a synthetic mesh on the infected surgical field? Hernia 19(2):239–246CrossRefPubMed Birolini C, de Mirinda JS, Utiyama EM, Rosslan S (2015) A retrospective review and observations over a 16-year clinical experience on the surgical treatment of chronic mesh infection. What about replacing a synthetic mesh on the infected surgical field? Hernia 19(2):239–246CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA (2013) A 5 year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biological mesh. Ann Surg 257(16):991–996CrossRefPubMed Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA (2013) A 5 year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biological mesh. Ann Surg 257(16):991–996CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Montgomery A (2013) The battle between biologic and synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair. Hernia 17(1):3–11CrossRefPubMed Montgomery A (2013) The battle between biologic and synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair. Hernia 17(1):3–11CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hood K, Millikan K, Pittman T et al (2013) Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh. Am J Surg 205:322–328CrossRefPubMed Hood K, Millikan K, Pittman T et al (2013) Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh. Am J Surg 205:322–328CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up—a prospective, consecutive cohort study
Authors
G. Martis
L. Damjanovich
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1442-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Hernia 3/2016 Go to the issue