Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Review

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors: S. A. Antoniou, S. Morales-Conde, G. A. Antoniou, F. A. Granderath, F. Berrevoet, F. E. Muysoms, The Bonham Group

Published in: Hernia | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been developed with the objective to reduce surgical trauma, decrease associated surgical stress and to improve cosmetic outcome. However, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of trocar-site hernia following this approach. Previous meta-analyses have suggested a trend toward higher hernia rates, but have failed to demonstrate a significant difference between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Method

Medline, AMED, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched up to May 2014. Randomized controlled trials comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery were considered for inclusion. Studies with patients aged less than 18 years and those reporting on robotic surgery were disregarded. Pooled odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to measure the comparative risk of trocar-site hernia following single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Results

Nineteen randomized trials encompassing 1705 patients were included. Trocar-site hernia occurred in 2.2 % of patients in the single-incision group and in 0.7 % of patients in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (odds ratio 2.26, 95 % confidence interval 1.00–5.08, p = 0.05). Sensitivity analysis of quality randomized trials validated the outcome estimates of the primary analysis. There was no heterogeneity among studies (I 2 = 0 %) and no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusion

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery involving entry into the peritoneal cavity through the umbilicus is associated with a slightly higher risk of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy. Its effect on long-term morbidity and quality of life is a matter for further investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMed Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2293–2304CrossRefPubMed Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2293–2304CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M, Menon GR (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1618–1628CrossRefPubMed Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M, Menon GR (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1618–1628CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Geng L, Sun C, Bai J (2013) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 8:e76530CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Geng L, Sun C, Bai J (2013) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 8:e76530CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Hao L, Liu M, Zhu H, Li Z (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:487–497CrossRefPubMed Hao L, Liu M, Zhu H, Li Z (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:487–497CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16:1790–1801CrossRefPubMed Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16:1790–1801CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Qiu J, Yuan H, Chen S, He Z, Han P, Wu H (2013) Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:815–831CrossRefPubMed Qiu J, Yuan H, Chen S, He Z, Han P, Wu H (2013) Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:815–831CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36:2644–2653CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36:2644–2653CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wang D, Wang Y, Ji ZL (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. ANZ J Surg 82:303–310CrossRefPubMed Wang D, Wang Y, Ji ZL (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. ANZ J Surg 82:303–310CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wang Z, Huang X, Zheng Q (2012) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 82:885–889CrossRefPubMed Wang Z, Huang X, Zheng Q (2012) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 82:885–889CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wu XS, Shi LB, Gu J, Dong P, Lu JH, Li ML, Mu JS, Wu WG, Yang JH, Ding QC, Zhang L, Liu YB (2013) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:183–191CrossRefPubMed Wu XS, Shi LB, Gu J, Dong P, Lu JH, Li ML, Mu JS, Wu WG, Yang JH, Ding QC, Zhang L, Liu YB (2013) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:183–191CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bingener J, Ghahfarokhi LS, Skaran P, Sloan J (2013) Responsiveness of quality of life instruments for the comparison of minimally invasive cholecystectomy procedures. Surg Endosc 27:2446–2453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bingener J, Ghahfarokhi LS, Skaran P, Sloan J (2013) Responsiveness of quality of life instruments for the comparison of minimally invasive cholecystectomy procedures. Surg Endosc 27:2446–2453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Santoro A, Parisi A, Noya G, Boselli C (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:191–208CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Santoro A, Parisi A, Noya G, Boselli C (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:191–208CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6CrossRefPubMed Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East BE, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NH, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders D, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F (2014) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5 Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East BE, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NH, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders D, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F (2014) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-014-1342-5
19.
go back to reference Erdas E, Dazzi C, Secchi F, Aresu S, Pitzalis A, Barbarossa M, Garau A, Murgia A, Contu P, Licheri S, Pomata M, Farina G (2012) Incidence and risk factors for trocar site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a long-term follow-up study. Hernia 16:431–437CrossRefPubMed Erdas E, Dazzi C, Secchi F, Aresu S, Pitzalis A, Barbarossa M, Garau A, Murgia A, Contu P, Licheri S, Pomata M, Farina G (2012) Incidence and risk factors for trocar site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a long-term follow-up study. Hernia 16:431–437CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2011) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 15:113–121CrossRefPubMed Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2011) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 15:113–121CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Altman DG (2009) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 187–235 Higgins JP, Altman DG (2009) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 187–235
26.
go back to reference Abd Ellatif ME, Askar WA, Abbas AE, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Amin M (2013) Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 27:1896–1906CrossRefPubMed Abd Ellatif ME, Askar WA, Abbas AE, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Amin M (2013) Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 27:1896–1906CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Zapf M, Yetasook A, Leung D, Salabat R, Denham W, Barrera E, Butt Z, Carbray J, Du H, Wang CE, Ujiki M (2013) Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery 154:662–670 Discussion 670–671CrossRefPubMed Zapf M, Yetasook A, Leung D, Salabat R, Denham W, Barrera E, Butt Z, Carbray J, Du H, Wang CE, Ujiki M (2013) Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery 154:662–670 Discussion 670–671CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN, Lin MY, Rogers SJ, Harris HW (2014) A Prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218:950–959CrossRefPubMed Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN, Lin MY, Rogers SJ, Harris HW (2014) A Prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218:950–959CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single-versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355CrossRefPubMed Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single-versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Villalobos Mori R, Escoll Rufino J, Herrerías González F, Mias Carballal MC, Escartin Arias A, Olsina Kissler JJ (2014) Prospective, randomized comparative study between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Cir Esp. doi:10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.12.013 Article in English, Spanish, Epub ahead of printPubMed Villalobos Mori R, Escoll Rufino J, Herrerías González F, Mias Carballal MC, Escartin Arias A, Olsina Kissler JJ (2014) Prospective, randomized comparative study between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Cir Esp. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ciresp.​2013.​12.​013 Article in English, Spanish, Epub ahead of printPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27CrossRefPubMed Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Herrero Fonollosa E, Cugat Andorrà E, García Domingo MI, Camps Lasa J, Porta Castejón R, Carvajal López F, Rodríguez Campos A (2012) A randomised prospective comparative study between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single port cholecystectomy in a major outpatient surgery unit. Cir Esp 90:641–646CrossRefPubMed Herrero Fonollosa E, Cugat Andorrà E, García Domingo MI, Camps Lasa J, Porta Castejón R, Carvajal López F, Rodríguez Campos A (2012) A randomised prospective comparative study between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single port cholecystectomy in a major outpatient surgery unit. Cir Esp 90:641–646CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J, Butt Z, Hoeger Y, Denham W, Barrera E, Ujiki MB (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215:702–708CrossRefPubMed Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J, Butt Z, Hoeger Y, Denham W, Barrera E, Ujiki MB (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215:702–708CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C, Olea JM, García JC (2012) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250). Surg Endosc 26:3435–3441CrossRefPubMed Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C, Olea JM, García JC (2012) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250). Surg Endosc 26:3435–3441CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Zheng M, Qin M, Zhao H (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:113–117CrossRefPubMed Zheng M, Qin M, Zhao H (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:113–117CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Anbara T, Soroush A, Nasiri S, Movafegh A, Aminian A (2014) A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Invest Surg 27:147–154CrossRefPubMed Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Anbara T, Soroush A, Nasiri S, Movafegh A, Aminian A (2014) A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Invest Surg 27:147–154CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047 Discussion 1047–1048CrossRefPubMed Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047 Discussion 1047–1048CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Noguera J, Tejada S, Tortajada C, Sánchez A, Muñoz J (2013) Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study. Surg Endosc 27:4284–4290CrossRefPubMed Noguera J, Tejada S, Tortajada C, Sánchez A, Muñoz J (2013) Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study. Surg Endosc 27:4284–4290CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S (2013) Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:339–349CrossRefPubMed Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S (2013) Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:339–349CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT, Sucullu I, Akyol M (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:12–16CrossRefPubMed Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT, Sucullu I, Akyol M (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:12–16CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE (2012) Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26:2823–2827CrossRefPubMed Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE (2012) Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26:2823–2827CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Vilallonga R, Barbaros U, Sümer A, Demirel T, Fort JM, González O, Rodriguez N, Carrasco MA (2012) Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases. J Minim Access Surg 8:74–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vilallonga R, Barbaros U, Sümer A, Demirel T, Fort JM, González O, Rodriguez N, Carrasco MA (2012) Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases. J Minim Access Surg 8:74–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias AC (2013) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1115CrossRefPubMed Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias AC (2013) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1115CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, Renton D (2013) Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:104–108CrossRefPubMed Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, Renton D (2013) Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:104–108CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO, Schirnhofer J, Pimpl K, Mittermair C, Obrist C, Brunner E, Hell T (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259:89–95CrossRefPubMed Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO, Schirnhofer J, Pimpl K, Mittermair C, Obrist C, Brunner E, Hell T (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259:89–95CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Wasa M, Kawahara H, Hasegawa T, Soh H, Taniguchi E, Ohashi S, Okada A (1999) Revision laparoscopy for incarcerated hernia at a 5-mm trocar site following pediatric laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:294–295CrossRefPubMed Nakajima K, Wasa M, Kawahara H, Hasegawa T, Soh H, Taniguchi E, Ohashi S, Okada A (1999) Revision laparoscopy for incarcerated hernia at a 5-mm trocar site following pediatric laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:294–295CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Backman T, Arnbjörnsson E, Kullendorff CM (2005) Omentum herniation at a 2-mm trocar site. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:87–88CrossRefPubMed Backman T, Arnbjörnsson E, Kullendorff CM (2005) Omentum herniation at a 2-mm trocar site. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:87–88CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Yee DS, Duel BP (2006) Omental herniation through a 3-mm umbilical trocar site. J Endourol 20:133–134CrossRefPubMed Yee DS, Duel BP (2006) Omental herniation through a 3-mm umbilical trocar site. J Endourol 20:133–134CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Clark LH, Soliman PT, Odetto D, Munsell MF, Schmeler KM, Fleming N, Westin SN, Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2013) Incidence of trocar site herniation following robotic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 131:400–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clark LH, Soliman PT, Odetto D, Munsell MF, Schmeler KM, Fleming N, Westin SN, Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2013) Incidence of trocar site herniation following robotic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 131:400–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Däubler P, Bittner R (2001) Access-related complications—an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10:23–30CrossRef Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Däubler P, Bittner R (2001) Access-related complications—an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10:23–30CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Chiu CC, Lee WJ, Wang W, Wei PL, Huang MT (2006) Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations. Obes Surg 16:913–918CrossRefPubMed Chiu CC, Lee WJ, Wang W, Wei PL, Huang MT (2006) Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations. Obes Surg 16:913–918CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Coda A, Bossotti M, Ferri F et al (2000) Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:34–38PubMed Coda A, Bossotti M, Ferri F et al (2000) Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:34–38PubMed
55.
go back to reference Nassar AH, Ashkar KA, Rashed AA, Abdulmoneum MG (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the umbilicus. Br J Surg 84:630–633CrossRefPubMed Nassar AH, Ashkar KA, Rashed AA, Abdulmoneum MG (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the umbilicus. Br J Surg 84:630–633CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533CrossRefPubMed Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors
S. A. Antoniou
S. Morales-Conde
G. A. Antoniou
F. A. Granderath
F. Berrevoet
F. E. Muysoms
The Bonham Group
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Hernia 1/2016 Go to the issue