Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 3/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Article

Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches

Authors: D. Millbourn, Y. Cengiz, L. A. Israelsson

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Midline abdominal incisions should be closed continuously with a suture length (SL) to wound length (WL) ratio above 4 using small stitches. The effect on the rate of wound complications of a very high ratio and other potential risk factors when closure is performed with small stitches is unknown.

Methods

Patients operated on through a midline incision were randomised to closure with small stitches, placed 5–8 mm from the wound edge and less than 5 mm apart, or with large stitches, placed more than 1 cm from the wound edge. Patient and operative variables were registered. Surgical site infection and incisional hernia were recorded.

Results

Three hundred and twenty-one patients were randomised to closure with small stitches and 370 with large stitches. Infection and herniation were less common with small stitches. With small stitches, no risk factors for infection or herniation were identified. With large stitches, wound contamination and the patient being diabetic were independent risk factors for infection, and long operation time and surgical site infection were risk factors for herniation. A very high SL to WL ratio did not affect the complication rates.

Conclusions

In midline abdominal incisions closed with small stitches, no risk factors for surgical site infection or incisional hernia were identified. Increasing the ratio very much above 4 had no adverse effects on the rate of wound complications. The higher rates of infection and herniation with an SL to WL ratio over 5 and in overweight patients in previous reports were probably related to wounds being closed with large stitches.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S (1998) Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg 176:666–670PubMedCrossRef Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S (1998) Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg 176:666–670PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231:436–442PubMedCrossRef Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231:436–442PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L (2001) Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg 67:421–426PubMed Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L (2001) Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg 67:421–426PubMed
4.
go back to reference van ’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356CrossRef van ’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356CrossRef
5.
go back to reference O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1:17–22PubMedCrossRef O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1:17–22PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pearl ML, Rayburn WF (2004) Choosing abdominal incision and closure techniques: a review. J Reprod Med 49:662–670PubMed Pearl ML, Rayburn WF (2004) Choosing abdominal incision and closure techniques: a review. J Reprod Med 49:662–670PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L (2005) Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg 62:220–225PubMedCrossRef Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L (2005) Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg 62:220–225PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251:843–856PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251:843–856PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mayer AD, Ausobsky JR, Evans M, Pollock AV (1981) Compression suture of the abdominal wall: a controlled trial in 302 major laparotomies. Br J Surg 68:632–634PubMedCrossRef Mayer AD, Ausobsky JR, Evans M, Pollock AV (1981) Compression suture of the abdominal wall: a controlled trial in 302 major laparotomies. Br J Surg 68:632–634PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Höer J, Klinge U, Schachtrupp A, Töns C, Schumpelick V (2001) Influence of suture technique on laparotomy wound healing: an experimental study in the rat. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:218–223PubMedCrossRef Höer J, Klinge U, Schachtrupp A, Töns C, Schumpelick V (2001) Influence of suture technique on laparotomy wound healing: an experimental study in the rat. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:218–223PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Höer JJ, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Influence of laparotomy closure technique on collagen synthesis in the incisional region. Hernia 6:93–98PubMedCrossRef Höer JJ, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Influence of laparotomy closure technique on collagen synthesis in the incisional region. Hernia 6:93–98PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cengiz Y, Blomquist P, Israelsson LA (2001) Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. Arch Surg 136:272–275PubMedCrossRef Cengiz Y, Blomquist P, Israelsson LA (2001) Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. Arch Surg 136:272–275PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cengiz Y, Gislason H, Svanes K, Israelsson LA (2001) Mass closure technique: an experimental study on separation of wound edge. Eur J Surg 167:60–63PubMedCrossRef Cengiz Y, Gislason H, Svanes K, Israelsson LA (2001) Mass closure technique: an experimental study on separation of wound edge. Eur J Surg 167:60–63PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Harlaar JJ, van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Ten Brinke JG, Hop WC, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Lange JF (2009) Small stitches with small suture distances increase laparotomy closure strength. Am J Surg 198:392–395PubMedCrossRef Harlaar JJ, van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Ten Brinke JG, Hop WC, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Lange JF (2009) Small stitches with small suture distances increase laparotomy closure strength. Am J Surg 198:392–395PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144:1056–1059PubMedCrossRef Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144:1056–1059PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1993) Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg 80:1284–1286PubMedCrossRef Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1993) Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg 80:1284–1286PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Israelsson LA, Jonsson T, Knutsson A (1996) Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Eur J Surg 162:605–609PubMed Israelsson LA, Jonsson T, Knutsson A (1996) Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Eur J Surg 162:605–609PubMed
20.
go back to reference Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1997) Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg 163:175–180PubMed Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1997) Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg 163:175–180PubMed
21.
go back to reference Pollock AV, Greenall MJ, Evans M (1979) Single-layer mass closure of major laparotomies by continuous suturing. J R Soc Med 72:889–893PubMed Pollock AV, Greenall MJ, Evans M (1979) Single-layer mass closure of major laparotomies by continuous suturing. J R Soc Med 72:889–893PubMed
22.
go back to reference Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474–480PubMedCrossRef Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474–480PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1994) Physical properties of self locking and conventional surgical knots. Eur J Surg 160:323–327PubMed Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1994) Physical properties of self locking and conventional surgical knots. Eur J Surg 160:323–327PubMed
24.
go back to reference Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608PubMedCrossRef Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Burger JW, Lange JF, Halm JA, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H (2005) Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery. World J Surg 29:1608–1613PubMedCrossRef Burger JW, Lange JF, Halm JA, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H (2005) Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery. World J Surg 29:1608–1613PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches
Authors
D. Millbourn
Y. Cengiz
L. A. Israelsson
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0775-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Hernia 3/2011 Go to the issue