Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Vascular Surgery 6/2005

01-11-2005 | Clinical Research

Prediction of the Exact Degree of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Using an Artificial Neural Network Based on Duplex Velocity Measurements

Authors: Reza Mofidi, MB, MCh, FRCSI, Thomas I. Powell, MB, BCh, FFRRCSI, Anthony Brabazon, BCom, MSc, MBA, Denis Mehigan, MCh, FRCSI, FRCS(Ed), Stephen J. Sheehan, MD, FRCSI, Donal P. MacErlaine, FFRRCSI, FRCR, Thomas V. Keaveny, MCh, FRCSI

Published in: Annals of Vascular Surgery | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Duplex ultrasound criteria use a combination of velocity measurements to evaluate internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. These evaluations divide ICA stenosis into broad categories. The aim of this study was to design an artificial neural network (ANN) capable of predicting the exact degree of ICA stenosis based on duplex velocity measurements. Consecutive patients with significant carotid atherosclerosis underwent carotid duplex ultrasound and angiography. Peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities in the ICA and common carotid artery were measured. Multilayered perceptron ANNs were constructed and trained to predict the degree of ICA stenosis and band the degree of ICA stenosis into 10% intervals based on these measurements. The accuracy of the ANN models in predicting the degree of ICA stenosis and classifying the ICA stenosis was compared with the angiographic degree of ICA stenosis and duplex velocity criteria. A total of 208 carotid bifurcations were studied. ANNs were able to accurately predict the degree of angiographic ICA stenosis (R2 = 0.9374, p < 0.0001) and band the ICA stenosis into the predefined 10% intervals [sensitivity 97.3% (95% CI 90.7-99.3), specificity 97.7 % (95% CI 93.6-99.2), accuracy 97.5%]. The ANN model was more accurate [discriminant power (DP) = 4.11] in banding the degree of ICA stenosis than duplex velocity criteria (DP = 1.67) (p < 0.05). The accuracy of the ANN in correctly identifying >70% ICA stenosis was 98.4% [sensitivity 96.4% (95% CI 93.8-99.3), specificity 98.7% (95% CI 93.4-99.8), DP = 4.21]. ANNs can accurately predict the degree of ICA stenosis. With further refinement, ANNs could replace velocity criteria in the assessment of ICA stenosis using duplex ultrasound.
Literature
1.
go back to reference North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterctomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effects of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-483 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterctomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effects of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-483
2.
go back to reference European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Medical Research Council European Carotid Surgery Trial. Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235-1243 European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Medical Research Council European Carotid Surgery Trial. Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235-1243
3.
go back to reference Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ. Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ishemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:542-548PubMed Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ. Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ishemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:542-548PubMed
4.
go back to reference Golledge J, Wright R, Pugh N, Lane IF. Colour coded duplex assessment alone before carotid enarterectomy. Br J Surg 1996;83:1234-1237CrossRefPubMed Golledge J, Wright R, Pugh N, Lane IF. Colour coded duplex assessment alone before carotid enarterectomy. Br J Surg 1996;83:1234-1237CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hood DB, Mattos MA, Mansour A, et al. Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:254-261PubMed Hood DB, Mattos MA, Mansour A, et al. Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:254-261PubMed
6.
go back to reference Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70-99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:152-159CrossRefPubMed Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70-99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:152-159CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chen JC, Salvian AJ, Taylor DC, Teal PA, Marotta TR, Hsiang YN. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study. Ann Vasc Surg 1998;12:244-247CrossRefPubMed Chen JC, Salvian AJ, Taylor DC, Teal PA, Marotta TR, Hsiang YN. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study. Ann Vasc Surg 1998;12:244-247CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Padayachee TS, Cox TC, Modaresi KB, Colchester AC, Taylor PR. The measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex with digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:180-185CrossRefPubMed Padayachee TS, Cox TC, Modaresi KB, Colchester AC, Taylor PR. The measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex with digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:180-185CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hwang CS, Liao KM, Tegeler CH. A multiple regression model of combined duplex criteria for detecting threshold carotid stenosis and predicting the exact degree of carotid stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2003;13:324-329CrossRefPubMed Hwang CS, Liao KM, Tegeler CH. A multiple regression model of combined duplex criteria for detecting threshold carotid stenosis and predicting the exact degree of carotid stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2003;13:324-329CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Perkins JM, Galland RB, Simmons MJ, Magee TR. Carotid duplex imaging: variation and validation. Br J Surg 2000;87:320-322CrossRefPubMed Perkins JM, Galland RB, Simmons MJ, Magee TR. Carotid duplex imaging: variation and validation. Br J Surg 2000;87:320-322CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Spronk S, Dolman W, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF, den Hoed PT. The vascular laboratory in practice: a national survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:300-303CrossRefPubMed Spronk S, Dolman W, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF, den Hoed PT. The vascular laboratory in practice: a national survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:300-303CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Filis KA, Arko FR, Johnson BL, et al. Duplex ultrasound criteria for defining the severity of carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:413-421CrossRefPubMed Filis KA, Arko FR, Johnson BL, et al. Duplex ultrasound criteria for defining the severity of carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:413-421CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cross SS, Harrison R, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet 1995;346:1057-1063CrossRef Cross SS, Harrison R, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet 1995;346:1057-1063CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Warner B. Understanding neural networks as statistical tools. Am Stat 1996;50:284-294 Warner B. Understanding neural networks as statistical tools. Am Stat 1996;50:284-294
16.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310PubMed
17.
go back to reference Blakeley DD, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V, et al. Noninvasive carotid artery testing — a meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med 1995;12:360-367.PubMed Blakeley DD, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V, et al. Noninvasive carotid artery testing — a meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med 1995;12:360-367.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Murie JA, John TG, Morris PJ. Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland: practice between 1984 and 1992. Br J Surg 1994;81:827-831PubMed Murie JA, John TG, Morris PJ. Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland: practice between 1984 and 1992. Br J Surg 1994;81:827-831PubMed
19.
go back to reference Shifrin EG, Bornstein NM, Kantarovsky A, et al. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography. Br J Surg 1996;83:1107-1109PubMed Shifrin EG, Bornstein NM, Kantarovsky A, et al. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography. Br J Surg 1996;83:1107-1109PubMed
20.
go back to reference Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415-1425CrossRefPubMed Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415-1425CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Lancet 1998;339:1415-1425 European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Lancet 1998;339:1415-1425
22.
go back to reference Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421-1428 Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421-1428
23.
go back to reference Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, Hatsukami T, Taylor LM, Strandemess DE. Screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60 to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:989-994PubMed Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, Hatsukami T, Taylor LM, Strandemess DE. Screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60 to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:989-994PubMed
24.
go back to reference Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis DT. Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1995;22:697-705PubMed Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis DT. Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1995;22:697-705PubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Lee VS, Hertzberg BS, Workman MJ, et al. Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery: effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease. Radiology 2000;214:387-392PubMed Lee VS, Hertzberg BS, Workman MJ, et al. Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery: effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease. Radiology 2000;214:387-392PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lee VS, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Carroll BA. Assessment of stenosis: implications of variability of Doppler measurements in normal-appearing carotid arteries. Radiology 1999;212:493-498PubMed Lee VS, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Carroll BA. Assessment of stenosis: implications of variability of Doppler measurements in normal-appearing carotid arteries. Radiology 1999;212:493-498PubMed
28.
go back to reference Zbornikova V, Johansson I. Duplex criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenosis >50% based on multiregression analysis. J Neuroimaging 1998;8:132-135PubMed Zbornikova V, Johansson I. Duplex criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenosis >50% based on multiregression analysis. J Neuroimaging 1998;8:132-135PubMed
29.
go back to reference Beebe HG, Salles-Cunha SX, Scissons RP, Dosick SM. Carotid arterial ultrasound scan imaging a direct approach to stenosis measurement. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:838-844PubMed Beebe HG, Salles-Cunha SX, Scissons RP, Dosick SM. Carotid arterial ultrasound scan imaging a direct approach to stenosis measurement. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:838-844PubMed
30.
go back to reference Jamor S, El-Atrozy T, Griffin M, Tegos T, Danjhi S, Nicolaides A. Grading internal carotid artery stenosis using b-mode ultrasound (in vivo study). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18:315-322CrossRefPubMed Jamor S, El-Atrozy T, Griffin M, Tegos T, Danjhi S, Nicolaides A. Grading internal carotid artery stenosis using b-mode ultrasound (in vivo study). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18:315-322CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ray SA, Lockhart SJ, Dourado R, Irvine AT, Burnand KG. Effect of contralateral disease on duplex measurements of internal carotid artery stenosis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1057-1062CrossRefPubMed Ray SA, Lockhart SJ, Dourado R, Irvine AT, Burnand KG. Effect of contralateral disease on duplex measurements of internal carotid artery stenosis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1057-1062CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Fujitani RM, Mills JL, Wang LM, Taylor SM. The effect of unilateral internal carotid arterial occlusion upon contralateral duplex study: criteria for accurate interpretation. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:459-467CrossRefPubMed Fujitani RM, Mills JL, Wang LM, Taylor SM. The effect of unilateral internal carotid arterial occlusion upon contralateral duplex study: criteria for accurate interpretation. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:459-467CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prediction of the Exact Degree of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Using an Artificial Neural Network Based on Duplex Velocity Measurements
Authors
Reza Mofidi, MB, MCh, FRCSI
Thomas I. Powell, MB, BCh, FFRRCSI
Anthony Brabazon, BCom, MSc, MBA
Denis Mehigan, MCh, FRCSI, FRCS(Ed)
Stephen J. Sheehan, MD, FRCSI
Donal P. MacErlaine, FFRRCSI, FRCR
Thomas V. Keaveny, MCh, FRCSI
Publication date
01-11-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Vascular Surgery / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0890-5096
Electronic ISSN: 1615-5947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-005-7685-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

Annals of Vascular Surgery 6/2005 Go to the issue

Papers Presented at the Fifteenth Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society

Neoaortic Reconstruction for Aortic Graft Infection: Need for Endovascular Adjunctive Therapies?

Papers Presented at the Fifteenth Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society

Healing of Transmetatarsal Amputation in the Diabetic Patient: Is Angiography Predictive?