Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Tumor Pathology 1/2011

01-02-2011 | Original Article

Quantitative digital assessment of MGMT immunohistochemical expression in glioblastoma tissue

Authors: Yukie Araki, Masahiro Mizoguchi, Koji Yoshimoto, Tadahisa Shono, Toshiyuki Amano, Akira Nakamizo, Satoshi O. Suzuki, Toru Iwaki, Tomio Sasaki

Published in: Brain Tumor Pathology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Recent reports have suggested an important clinical role for hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter in patients with glioblastomas. Whether MGMT protein expression is correlated with promoter hypermethylation and patient outcomes, however, has not been elucidated. Here we describe a quantitative digital method for assessment of MGMT-specific immunostaining, and analyze the relationship between expression levels and methylation status of the MGMT promoter. We investigated 46 tumors from patients who received a diagnosis of glioblastoma or gliosarcoma. Immunohistochemistry with anti-MGMT antibody and methylation-specific PCR using bisulfite-modified tumor DNA were performed. The digital assessment method used image-analysis software to determine a digital MGMT staining index, and the results were compared with those obtained via conventional visual assessments. The digital staining index clearly correlated with the methylation status of MGMT promoter. In addition, the index correlated with our observational results when nuclear and cytoplasmic staining were assessed in three different fields. Our digital assessment method enabled us to assess uncertain immunopositive samples objectively and quantitatively, which is an important consideration when examining heterogeneous cellular staining. We expect that this method will be useful for assessment of heterogeneous staining with any antibodies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E et al (2000) Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med 343:1350–1354CrossRefPubMed Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E et al (2000) Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med 343:1350–1354CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Liu L, Gerson SL (2006) Targeted modulation of MGMT: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res 12:328–331CrossRefPubMed Liu L, Gerson SL (2006) Targeted modulation of MGMT: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res 12:328–331CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brell M, Tortosa A, Verger E et al (2005) Prognostic significance of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase determined by promoter hypermethylation and immunohistochemical expression in anaplastic gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 11:5167–5174CrossRefPubMed Brell M, Tortosa A, Verger E et al (2005) Prognostic significance of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase determined by promoter hypermethylation and immunohistochemical expression in anaplastic gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 11:5167–5174CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cankovic M, Mikkelsen T, Rosenblum ML et al (2007) A simplified laboratory validated assay for MGMT promoter hypermethylation analysis of glioma specimens from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Lab Invest 87:392–397PubMed Cankovic M, Mikkelsen T, Rosenblum ML et al (2007) A simplified laboratory validated assay for MGMT promoter hypermethylation analysis of glioma specimens from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Lab Invest 87:392–397PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cao VT, Jung TY, Jung S et al (2009) The correlation and prognostic significance of MGMT promoter methylation and MGMT protein in glioblastomas. Neurosurgery 65:866–875CrossRefPubMed Cao VT, Jung TY, Jung S et al (2009) The correlation and prognostic significance of MGMT promoter methylation and MGMT protein in glioblastomas. Neurosurgery 65:866–875CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Karayan-Tapon L, Quillien V, Guilhot J et al (2010) Prognostic value of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in glioblastoma patients, assessed by five different methods. J Neurooncol 97:311–322CrossRefPubMed Karayan-Tapon L, Quillien V, Guilhot J et al (2010) Prognostic value of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in glioblastoma patients, assessed by five different methods. J Neurooncol 97:311–322CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Parkinson JF, Wheeler HR, Clarkson A et al (2008) Variation of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in serial samples in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 87:71–78CrossRefPubMed Parkinson JF, Wheeler HR, Clarkson A et al (2008) Variation of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in serial samples in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 87:71–78CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sonoda Y, Yokosawa M, Saito R et al (2010) O(6)-Methylguanine DNA methyltransferase determined by promoter hypermethylation and immunohistochemical expression is correlated with progression-free survival in patients with glioblastoma. Int J Clin Oncol 15:352–358CrossRefPubMed Sonoda Y, Yokosawa M, Saito R et al (2010) O(6)-Methylguanine DNA methyltransferase determined by promoter hypermethylation and immunohistochemical expression is correlated with progression-free survival in patients with glioblastoma. Int J Clin Oncol 15:352–358CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Maxwell JA, Johnson SP, Quinn JA et al (2006) Quantitative analysis of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in malignant glioma. Mol Cancer Ther 5:2531–2539CrossRefPubMed Maxwell JA, Johnson SP, Quinn JA et al (2006) Quantitative analysis of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in malignant glioma. Mol Cancer Ther 5:2531–2539CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Metellus P, Coulibaly B, Nanni I et al (2009) Prognostic impact of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase silencing in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme who undergo surgery and carmustine wafer implantation: a prospective patient cohort. Cancer 115:4783–4794CrossRefPubMed Metellus P, Coulibaly B, Nanni I et al (2009) Prognostic impact of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase silencing in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme who undergo surgery and carmustine wafer implantation: a prospective patient cohort. Cancer 115:4783–4794CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sasai K, Nodashira M, Nishihara H et al (2008) Careful exclusion of non-neoplastic brain components is required for an appropriate evaluation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in glioma: relationship between immunohistochemistry and methylation analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 32:1220–1227CrossRefPubMed Sasai K, Nodashira M, Nishihara H et al (2008) Careful exclusion of non-neoplastic brain components is required for an appropriate evaluation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in glioma: relationship between immunohistochemistry and methylation analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 32:1220–1227CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Preusser M, Janzer RC, Felsberg J et al (2008) Anti-O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme: observer variability and lack of association with patient survival impede its use as clinical biomarker. Brain Pathol 18:520–532PubMed Preusser M, Janzer RC, Felsberg J et al (2008) Anti-O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme: observer variability and lack of association with patient survival impede its use as clinical biomarker. Brain Pathol 18:520–532PubMed
14.
go back to reference Anda T, Shabani HK, Tsunoda K et al (2003) Relationship between expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, glutathione-S-transferase pi in glioblastoma and the survival of the patients treated with nimustine hydrochloride: an immunohistochemical analysis. Neurol Res 25:241–248CrossRefPubMed Anda T, Shabani HK, Tsunoda K et al (2003) Relationship between expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, glutathione-S-transferase pi in glioblastoma and the survival of the patients treated with nimustine hydrochloride: an immunohistochemical analysis. Neurol Res 25:241–248CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Preusser M (2009) MGMT analysis at DNA, RNA and protein levels in glioblastoma tissue. Histol Histopathol 24:511–518PubMed Preusser M (2009) MGMT analysis at DNA, RNA and protein levels in glioblastoma tissue. Histol Histopathol 24:511–518PubMed
16.
go back to reference Felsberg J, Rapp M, Loeser S et al (2009) Prognostic significance of molecular markers and extent of resection in primary glioblastoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:6683–6693CrossRefPubMed Felsberg J, Rapp M, Loeser S et al (2009) Prognostic significance of molecular markers and extent of resection in primary glioblastoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:6683–6693CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Grasbon-Frodl EM, Kreth FW, Ruiter M et al (2007) Intratumoral homogeneity of MGMT promoter hypermethylation as demonstrated in serial stereotactic specimens from anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas. Int J Cancer 121:2458–2464CrossRefPubMed Grasbon-Frodl EM, Kreth FW, Ruiter M et al (2007) Intratumoral homogeneity of MGMT promoter hypermethylation as demonstrated in serial stereotactic specimens from anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas. Int J Cancer 121:2458–2464CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mollemann M, Wolter M, Felsberg J et al (2005) Frequent promoter hypermethylation and low expression of the MGMT gene in oligodendroglial tumors. Int J Cancer 113:379–385CrossRefPubMed Mollemann M, Wolter M, Felsberg J et al (2005) Frequent promoter hypermethylation and low expression of the MGMT gene in oligodendroglial tumors. Int J Cancer 113:379–385CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nakagawa T, Ido K, Sakuma T et al (2009) Prognostic significance of the immunohistochemical expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, P-glycoprotein, and multidrug resistance protein-1 in glioblastomas. Neuropathology 29:379–388CrossRefPubMed Nakagawa T, Ido K, Sakuma T et al (2009) Prognostic significance of the immunohistochemical expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, P-glycoprotein, and multidrug resistance protein-1 in glioblastomas. Neuropathology 29:379–388CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nakasu S, Fukami T, Baba K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical study for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in the non-neoplastic and neoplastic components of gliomas. J Neurooncol 70:333–340CrossRefPubMed Nakasu S, Fukami T, Baba K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical study for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in the non-neoplastic and neoplastic components of gliomas. J Neurooncol 70:333–340CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sonoda Y, Kumabe T, Watanabe M et al (2009) Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: clinical features and molecular analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:1349–1358CrossRef Sonoda Y, Kumabe T, Watanabe M et al (2009) Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: clinical features and molecular analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:1349–1358CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yachi K, Watanabe T, Ohta T et al (2008) Relevance of MSP assay for the detection of MGMT promoter hypermethylation in glioblastomas. Int J Oncol 33:469–475PubMed Yachi K, Watanabe T, Ohta T et al (2008) Relevance of MSP assay for the detection of MGMT promoter hypermethylation in glioblastomas. Int J Oncol 33:469–475PubMed
23.
go back to reference Cloughesy TF, Yoshimoto K, Nghiemphu P et al (2008) Antitumor activity of rapamycin in a Phase I trial for patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma. PLoS Med 5:e8CrossRefPubMed Cloughesy TF, Yoshimoto K, Nghiemphu P et al (2008) Antitumor activity of rapamycin in a Phase I trial for patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma. PLoS Med 5:e8CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I et al (2005) Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353:2012–2024CrossRefPubMed Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I et al (2005) Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353:2012–2024CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kleihues P, Burger PC, Aldape KD, Brat DJ et al (2007) Glioblastoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 4th edn. IARC, Lyon, pp 33–49 Kleihues P, Burger PC, Aldape KD, Brat DJ et al (2007) Glioblastoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 4th edn. IARC, Lyon, pp 33–49
26.
go back to reference Eoli M, Pollo B, Bianchessi F et al (2006) Molecular markers of gliomas: a clinical approach. Neurol Res 28:538–541CrossRefPubMed Eoli M, Pollo B, Bianchessi F et al (2006) Molecular markers of gliomas: a clinical approach. Neurol Res 28:538–541CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):997–1003CrossRefPubMed Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):997–1003CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mark R et al (2007) Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25:4127–4136CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mark R et al (2007) Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25:4127–4136CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gerson SL (2002) Clinical relevance of MGMT in the treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:2388–2399CrossRefPubMed Gerson SL (2002) Clinical relevance of MGMT in the treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:2388–2399CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Srivenugopal KS, Yuan XH, Friedman HS et al (1996) Ubiquitination-dependent proteolysis of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in human and murine tumor cells following inactivation with O6-benzylguanine or 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Biochemistry 35:1328–1334CrossRefPubMed Srivenugopal KS, Yuan XH, Friedman HS et al (1996) Ubiquitination-dependent proteolysis of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in human and murine tumor cells following inactivation with O6-benzylguanine or 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Biochemistry 35:1328–1334CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Zaidi NH, Liu L, Gerson SL (1996) Quantitative immunohistochemical estimates of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase expression in normal and malignant human colon. Clin Cancer Res 2:577–584PubMed Zaidi NH, Liu L, Gerson SL (1996) Quantitative immunohistochemical estimates of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase expression in normal and malignant human colon. Clin Cancer Res 2:577–584PubMed
Metadata
Title
Quantitative digital assessment of MGMT immunohistochemical expression in glioblastoma tissue
Authors
Yukie Araki
Masahiro Mizoguchi
Koji Yoshimoto
Tadahisa Shono
Toshiyuki Amano
Akira Nakamizo
Satoshi O. Suzuki
Toru Iwaki
Tomio Sasaki
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Brain Tumor Pathology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1433-7398
Electronic ISSN: 1861-387X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-010-0004-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Brain Tumor Pathology 1/2011 Go to the issue