Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Orthopantomogram | Original Article

Accuracy of orthopantomograms in the assessment of implant position following alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement

Authors: Mustafa Mian, Sarah Fink, David Ackland, Nathan Wang, George Dimitroulis

Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of orthopantomograms (OPGs) when assessing post-operative temporomandibular joint (TMJ) implant position, compared with cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was undertaken on six adult patients who were implanted with a custom TMJ prosthesis due to end-stage TMJ disease. Post-operative CBCT was compared with post-operative OPGs. Overall magnification of each OPG was calculated and used to linearly rescale each image. Implant position was assessed by measuring the gonion angle and the distance between each surgical screw and the mandibular gonion (SG length).

Results

Mean magnification for OPGs was 24.2%. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the gonion angle on OPGs compared with CBCT images. There was a mean decrease in SG lengths of 0.02 mm on OPGs, corresponding to error level of 5.31%. The 95% limits of agreement between OPGs and CBCT images for SG lengths were 1.65 mm and − 1.73 mm.

Conclusion

This study presents a clinically applicable and accurate first-line radiographic screening tool to assess TMJ implant position. When combined with clinical assessment, OPGs can help reduce the need for further imaging and radiation exposure post-operatively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dimitroulis G (2013) A new surgical classification for temporomandibular joint disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(2):218–222CrossRef Dimitroulis G (2013) A new surgical classification for temporomandibular joint disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(2):218–222CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dimitroulis G, Austin S, Sin Lee PV, Ackland D (2018) A new three-dimensional, print-on-demand temporomandibular prosthetic total joint replacement system: preliminary outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46(8):1192–1198CrossRef Dimitroulis G, Austin S, Sin Lee PV, Ackland D (2018) A new three-dimensional, print-on-demand temporomandibular prosthetic total joint replacement system: preliminary outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46(8):1192–1198CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR, Figueroa AA (2005) Cephalometric craniofacial characteristics in patients with temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Chang Gung Med J 28(7):456–466PubMed Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR, Figueroa AA (2005) Cephalometric craniofacial characteristics in patients with temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Chang Gung Med J 28(7):456–466PubMed
5.
go back to reference Devlin H, Yuan J (2013) Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42(1):29951683CrossRef Devlin H, Yuan J (2013) Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42(1):29951683CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD (2011) Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(2):76–83CrossRef Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD (2011) Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(2):76–83CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ (2012) Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod 34(3):263–275CrossRef Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ (2012) Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod 34(3):263–275CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rejebian GP (1979) A statistical correlation of individual tooth size distortions on the orthopantomographic radiograph. Am J Orthod 75(5):525–534CrossRef Rejebian GP (1979) A statistical correlation of individual tooth size distortions on the orthopantomographic radiograph. Am J Orthod 75(5):525–534CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liang H, Frederiksen NL (2004) Focal trough and patient positioning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33(2):128–129CrossRef Liang H, Frederiksen NL (2004) Focal trough and patient positioning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33(2):128–129CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sadat-Khonsari R, Fenske C, Behfar L, Bauss O (2011) Panoramic radiography: effects of head alignment on the vertical dimension of the mandibular ramus and condyle region. Eur J Orthod 34(2):164–169CrossRef Sadat-Khonsari R, Fenske C, Behfar L, Bauss O (2011) Panoramic radiography: effects of head alignment on the vertical dimension of the mandibular ramus and condyle region. Eur J Orthod 34(2):164–169CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of orthopantomograms in the assessment of implant position following alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement
Authors
Mustafa Mian
Sarah Fink
David Ackland
Nathan Wang
George Dimitroulis
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00842-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2/2020 Go to the issue