Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Review

The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review

Authors: Charlotte L. Hall, Althea Z. Valentine, Madeleine J. Groom, Gemma M. Walker, Kapil Sayal, David Daley, Chris Hollis

Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is typically diagnosed using clinical observation and subjective informant reports. Once children commence ADHD medication, robust monitoring is required to detect partial or non-responses. The extent to which neuropsychological continuous performance tests (CPTs) and objective measures of activity can clinically aid the assessment and titration process in ADHD is not fully understood. This review describes the current evidence base for the use of CPTs and objectively measured activity to support the diagnostic procedure and medication management for children with ADHD. Four databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), and PsycARTICLES) were systematically searched to understand the current evidence base for (1) the use of CPTs to aid clinical assessment of ADHD; (2) the use of CPTs to aid medication management; and (3) the clinical utility of objective measures of activity in ADHD. Sixty relevant articles were identified. The search revealed six commercially available CPTs that had been reported on for their clinical use. There were mixed findings with regard to the use of CPTs to assess and manage medication, with contrasting evidence on their ability to support clinical decision-making. There was a strong evidence base for the use of objective measures of activity to aid ADHD/non-ADHD group differentiation, which appears sensitive to medication effects and would also benefit from further research on their clinical utility. The findings suggest that combining CPTs and an objective measure of activity may be particularly useful as a clinical tool and worthy of further pursuit.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Excluding an erratum to the Rielly et al. article [27], the correct specificity figures were obtained from the Rielly et al. erratum [28].
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference NICE (2008) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder:diagnosis and managment of ADHD in children, young people and adults. Clin Guidel 72. In: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London NICE (2008) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder:diagnosis and managment of ADHD in children, young people and adults. Clin Guidel 72. In: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London
2.
go back to reference Magyary D, Brandt P (2002) A decision tree and clinical paths for the assessment and management of children with ADHD. Issues Ment Health Nurs 23:553–566CrossRefPubMed Magyary D, Brandt P (2002) A decision tree and clinical paths for the assessment and management of children with ADHD. Issues Ment Health Nurs 23:553–566CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Faraone SV, Biederman J (1998) Neurobiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiat 44:951–958CrossRefPubMed Faraone SV, Biederman J (1998) Neurobiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiat 44:951–958CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ogundele MO, Ayyash HF, Banerjee S (2011) Role of computerised continuous performance task tests in ADHD. Prog Neural Psychiatr 15:8–13CrossRef Ogundele MO, Ayyash HF, Banerjee S (2011) Role of computerised continuous performance task tests in ADHD. Prog Neural Psychiatr 15:8–13CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Weinberg WA, Brumback RA (1992) The myth of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: symptoms resulting from multiple causes. J Child Neurol 7:431–445CrossRefPubMed Weinberg WA, Brumback RA (1992) The myth of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: symptoms resulting from multiple causes. J Child Neurol 7:431–445CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hall CL, Walker GM, Valentine AZ, Guo B, Kaylor-Hughes C, James M, Daley D, Sayal K, Hollis C (2014) Protocol investigating the clinical utility of an objective measure of activity and attention (QbTest) on diagnostic and treatment decision-making in children and young people with ADHD—‘Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD’(AQUA): a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 4:e006838CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hall CL, Walker GM, Valentine AZ, Guo B, Kaylor-Hughes C, James M, Daley D, Sayal K, Hollis C (2014) Protocol investigating the clinical utility of an objective measure of activity and attention (QbTest) on diagnostic and treatment decision-making in children and young people with ADHD—‘Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD’(AQUA): a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 4:e006838CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Epstein JN, Erkanli A, Conners CK, Klaric J, Costello JE, Angold A (2003) Relations between continuous performance test performance measures and ADHD behaviors. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31:543–554CrossRefPubMed Epstein JN, Erkanli A, Conners CK, Klaric J, Costello JE, Angold A (2003) Relations between continuous performance test performance measures and ADHD behaviors. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31:543–554CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Losier BJ, McGrath PJ, Klein RM (1996) Error patterns on the continuous performance test in non-medicated and medicated samples of children with and without ADHD: a meta-analytic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 37:971–987CrossRefPubMed Losier BJ, McGrath PJ, Klein RM (1996) Error patterns on the continuous performance test in non-medicated and medicated samples of children with and without ADHD: a meta-analytic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 37:971–987CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Riccio CA, Waldrop JJ, Reynolds CR, Lowe P (2001) Effects of stimulants on the continuous performance test (CPT): implications for CPT use and interpretation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 13:326–335CrossRefPubMed Riccio CA, Waldrop JJ, Reynolds CR, Lowe P (2001) Effects of stimulants on the continuous performance test (CPT): implications for CPT use and interpretation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 13:326–335CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dupuy T, Greenberg L (1993) TOVA manual for test of variables of attention computer program. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Dupuy T, Greenberg L (1993) TOVA manual for test of variables of attention computer program. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
11.
go back to reference Conners C (1995) The Conners Rating Scales: instruments for the assessment of childhood psychopathology. Duke University, Durham Conners C (1995) The Conners Rating Scales: instruments for the assessment of childhood psychopathology. Duke University, Durham
12.
go back to reference Gordon M (1982) The Gordon diagnostic system. Gordon Systems, New York Gordon M (1982) The Gordon diagnostic system. Gordon Systems, New York
13.
go back to reference Vogt C, Williams T (2011) Early identification of stimulant treatment responders, partial responders and non-responders using objective measures in children and adolescents with hyperkinetic disorder. Child Adolesc Ment Health 16:144–149CrossRef Vogt C, Williams T (2011) Early identification of stimulant treatment responders, partial responders and non-responders using objective measures in children and adolescents with hyperkinetic disorder. Child Adolesc Ment Health 16:144–149CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McGee RA, Clark SE, Symons DK (2000) Does the Conners’ continuous performance test aid in ADHD diagnosis? J Abnorm Child Psychol 28:415–424CrossRefPubMed McGee RA, Clark SE, Symons DK (2000) Does the Conners’ continuous performance test aid in ADHD diagnosis? J Abnorm Child Psychol 28:415–424CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lis S, Baer N, Stein-en-Nosse C, Gallhofer B, Sammer G, Kirsch P (2010) Objective measurement of motor activity during cognitive performance in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Acta Psychiat Scand 122:285–294CrossRefPubMed Lis S, Baer N, Stein-en-Nosse C, Gallhofer B, Sammer G, Kirsch P (2010) Objective measurement of motor activity during cognitive performance in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Acta Psychiat Scand 122:285–294CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chae PK, Kim J-H, Noh K-S (2003) Diagnosis of ADHD among gifted children in relation to KEDI-WISC and T.O.V.A. performance. Gift Child Q 47:192–201CrossRef Chae PK, Kim J-H, Noh K-S (2003) Diagnosis of ADHD among gifted children in relation to KEDI-WISC and T.O.V.A. performance. Gift Child Q 47:192–201CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mayes S, Calhoun L, Crowell EW (2001) Clinical validity and interpretation of the Gordon diagnostic system in ADHD assessments. Child Neuropsychol 7:32–41CrossRef Mayes S, Calhoun L, Crowell EW (2001) Clinical validity and interpretation of the Gordon diagnostic system in ADHD assessments. Child Neuropsychol 7:32–41CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang L-J, Huang Y-S, Chiang Y-L, Hsiao C-C, Shang Z-Y, Chen C-K (2011) Clinical symptoms and performance on the continuous performance test in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder between subtypes: a natural follow-up study for 6 months. BMC Psychiatry 11:65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang L-J, Huang Y-S, Chiang Y-L, Hsiao C-C, Shang Z-Y, Chen C-K (2011) Clinical symptoms and performance on the continuous performance test in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder between subtypes: a natural follow-up study for 6 months. BMC Psychiatry 11:65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kim J, Lee Y, Han D, Min K, Kim D, Lee C (2015) The utility of quantitative electroencephalography and integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test as auxiliary tools for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis. Clin Neurophysiol 126:532–540CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Lee Y, Han D, Min K, Kim D, Lee C (2015) The utility of quantitative electroencephalography and integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test as auxiliary tools for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis. Clin Neurophysiol 126:532–540CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ulberstad F (2012) QbTest technical manual. Qbtech AB, Stockholm Ulberstad F (2012) QbTest technical manual. Qbtech AB, Stockholm
21.
go back to reference Tabori-Kraft J, Sørensen MJ, Kærgaard M, Dalsgaard S, Thomsen PH (2007) Is OPTAx™ useful for monitoring the effect of stimulants on hyperactivity and inattention? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 16:347–351CrossRefPubMed Tabori-Kraft J, Sørensen MJ, Kærgaard M, Dalsgaard S, Thomsen PH (2007) Is OPTAx™ useful for monitoring the effect of stimulants on hyperactivity and inattention? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 16:347–351CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Porumb M (2007) Using T.O.V.A. for the assessment of ADHD: a case study. Cogn Creier Comport 11:571–584 Porumb M (2007) Using T.O.V.A. for the assessment of ADHD: a case study. Cogn Creier Comport 11:571–584
23.
go back to reference Preston AS, Fennell EB, Bussing R (2005) Utility of a CPT in diagnosing ADHD among a representative sample of high-risk children: a cautionary study. Child Neuropsychol 11:459–469CrossRefPubMed Preston AS, Fennell EB, Bussing R (2005) Utility of a CPT in diagnosing ADHD among a representative sample of high-risk children: a cautionary study. Child Neuropsychol 11:459–469CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Schatz AM, Ballantyne AO, Trauner DA (2001) Sensitivity and specificity of a computerized test of attention in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Assessment 8:357–365CrossRefPubMed Schatz AM, Ballantyne AO, Trauner DA (2001) Sensitivity and specificity of a computerized test of attention in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Assessment 8:357–365CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wada N, Yamashita Y, Matsuishi T, Ohtani Y, Kato H (2000) The test of variables of attention (TOVA) is useful in the diagnosis of Japanese male children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain Dev 22:378–382CrossRefPubMed Wada N, Yamashita Y, Matsuishi T, Ohtani Y, Kato H (2000) The test of variables of attention (TOVA) is useful in the diagnosis of Japanese male children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain Dev 22:378–382CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Forbes GB (1998) Clinical utility of the test of variables of attention (TOVA) in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol 54:461–476CrossRefPubMed Forbes GB (1998) Clinical utility of the test of variables of attention (TOVA) in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol 54:461–476CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rielly NE, Cunningham CE, Richards JE, Elbard HJ, MAhoney WJ (1999) Detecting attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a communications clinic: diagnostic utility of the gordon diagnostic system. J Clin Exp Neuropsycol 21:685–700CrossRef Rielly NE, Cunningham CE, Richards JE, Elbard HJ, MAhoney WJ (1999) Detecting attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a communications clinic: diagnostic utility of the gordon diagnostic system. J Clin Exp Neuropsycol 21:685–700CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rielly NE, Cunningham CE, Richards JE, Elbard H, Mahoney WJ (2000) Detecting attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a communications clinic: diagnostic utility of the gordon diagnostic system. J Clin Exp Neuropsycol 22:435CrossRef Rielly NE, Cunningham CE, Richards JE, Elbard H, Mahoney WJ (2000) Detecting attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a communications clinic: diagnostic utility of the gordon diagnostic system. J Clin Exp Neuropsycol 22:435CrossRef
29.
go back to reference DuPaul GJ, Anastopoulos AD, Shelton TL, Guevremont DC, Metevia L (1992) Multimethod assessment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: the diagnostic utility of clinic-based tests. J Clin Child Psychol 21:394–402CrossRef DuPaul GJ, Anastopoulos AD, Shelton TL, Guevremont DC, Metevia L (1992) Multimethod assessment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: the diagnostic utility of clinic-based tests. J Clin Child Psychol 21:394–402CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maye Mayes S, Calhoun SL (2002) The gordon diagnostic system and WISC-III Freedom from Distractibility Index: validity in identifying clinic-referred children with and without ADHD. Psychol Rep 91:575–587CrossRef Maye Mayes S, Calhoun SL (2002) The gordon diagnostic system and WISC-III Freedom from Distractibility Index: validity in identifying clinic-referred children with and without ADHD. Psychol Rep 91:575–587CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gordon M (1986) How is a computerized attention test used in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder? J Child Contemp Soc 19:53–64CrossRef Gordon M (1986) How is a computerized attention test used in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder? J Child Contemp Soc 19:53–64CrossRef
32.
go back to reference El-Sayed E, Van’t Hooft I, Fried I, Larsson JO, Malmberg K, Rydelius PA (1999) Measurements of attention deficits and impulsivity: a Swedish study of the gordon diagnostic system. Acta Paediatr 88:1262–1268CrossRefPubMed El-Sayed E, Van’t Hooft I, Fried I, Larsson JO, Malmberg K, Rydelius PA (1999) Measurements of attention deficits and impulsivity: a Swedish study of the gordon diagnostic system. Acta Paediatr 88:1262–1268CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Mayes SD, Calhoun SL, Chase GA, Mink DM, Stagg RE (2009) ADHD subtypes and co-occurring anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder: differences in gordon diagnostic system and Wechsler Working Memory and Processing Speed Index scores. J Atten Disord 12:540–550CrossRefPubMed Mayes SD, Calhoun SL, Chase GA, Mink DM, Stagg RE (2009) ADHD subtypes and co-occurring anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder: differences in gordon diagnostic system and Wechsler Working Memory and Processing Speed Index scores. J Atten Disord 12:540–550CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Trommer BL, Hoeppner J-AB, Lorber R, Armstrong K (1988) Pitfalls in the use of a continuous performance test as a diagnostic tool in attention deficit disorder. J Dev Behav Pediatr 9:339–345CrossRefPubMed Trommer BL, Hoeppner J-AB, Lorber R, Armstrong K (1988) Pitfalls in the use of a continuous performance test as a diagnostic tool in attention deficit disorder. J Dev Behav Pediatr 9:339–345CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Matier-Sharma K, Perachio N, Newcorn JH, Sharma V, Halperin JM (1995) Differential diagnosis of ADHD: are objective measures of attention, impulsivity, and activity level helpful? Child Neuropsychol 1:118–127CrossRef Matier-Sharma K, Perachio N, Newcorn JH, Sharma V, Halperin JM (1995) Differential diagnosis of ADHD: are objective measures of attention, impulsivity, and activity level helpful? Child Neuropsychol 1:118–127CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Barkley RA, Grodzinsky G (1994) Are tests of frontal lobe functions useful in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorders? Clin Neuropsychol 8:121–139CrossRef Barkley RA, Grodzinsky G (1994) Are tests of frontal lobe functions useful in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorders? Clin Neuropsychol 8:121–139CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Grodzinsky GM, Barkley RA (1999) Predictive power of frontal lobe tests in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neuropsychol 13:12–21CrossRefPubMed Grodzinsky GM, Barkley RA (1999) Predictive power of frontal lobe tests in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neuropsychol 13:12–21CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Alloway TP, Gathercole SE, Holmes J, Place M, Elliott JG, Hilton K (2009) The diagnostic utility of behavioral checklists in identifying children with ADHD and children with working memory deficits. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 40:353–366CrossRef Alloway TP, Gathercole SE, Holmes J, Place M, Elliott JG, Hilton K (2009) The diagnostic utility of behavioral checklists in identifying children with ADHD and children with working memory deficits. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 40:353–366CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Perugini EM, Harvey EA, Lovejoy DW, Sandstrom K, Webb AH (2000) The predictive power of combined neuropsychological measures for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Child Neuropsychol 6:101–114CrossRefPubMed Perugini EM, Harvey EA, Lovejoy DW, Sandstrom K, Webb AH (2000) The predictive power of combined neuropsychological measures for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Child Neuropsychol 6:101–114CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Kleinman A, Caetano SC, Brentani H, de Almeida Rocca CC, Dos Santos B, Andrade ER, Zeni CP, Tramontina S, Rohde LAP, Lafer B (2015) Attention-based classification pattern, a research domain criteria framework, in youths with bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. doi:10.1177/0004867414557957 PubMed Kleinman A, Caetano SC, Brentani H, de Almeida Rocca CC, Dos Santos B, Andrade ER, Zeni CP, Tramontina S, Rohde LAP, Lafer B (2015) Attention-based classification pattern, a research domain criteria framework, in youths with bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. doi:10.​1177/​0004867414557957​ PubMed
41.
go back to reference Vogt C, Shameli A (2011) Assessments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: use of objective measurements. Psychiatrist 35:380–383CrossRef Vogt C, Shameli A (2011) Assessments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: use of objective measurements. Psychiatrist 35:380–383CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Aggarwal A, Lillystone D (2000) A follow-up pilot study of objective measures in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Paediatr Child Health 36:134–138CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal A, Lillystone D (2000) A follow-up pilot study of objective measures in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Paediatr Child Health 36:134–138CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Manor I, Meidad S, Zalsman G, Zemishlany Z, Tyano S, Weizman A (2008) Objective versus subjective assessment of methylphenidate response. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 39:273–282CrossRef Manor I, Meidad S, Zalsman G, Zemishlany Z, Tyano S, Weizman A (2008) Objective versus subjective assessment of methylphenidate response. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 39:273–282CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Huang Y-S, Chao C-C, Wu Y-Y, Chen Y-Y, Chen C-K (2007) Acute effects of methylphenidate on performance during the test of variables of attention in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiat Clin Neurosci 61:219–225CrossRef Huang Y-S, Chao C-C, Wu Y-Y, Chen Y-Y, Chen C-K (2007) Acute effects of methylphenidate on performance during the test of variables of attention in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiat Clin Neurosci 61:219–225CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Wang L-J, Chen C-K, Huang Y-S (2015) Neurocognitive performance and behavioral symptoms in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during twenty-four months of treatment with methylphenidate. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 25:246–253CrossRefPubMed Wang L-J, Chen C-K, Huang Y-S (2015) Neurocognitive performance and behavioral symptoms in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during twenty-four months of treatment with methylphenidate. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 25:246–253CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Fernandez-Jaen A, Fernandez-Mayoralas DM, Pardos A, Calleja-Perez B, Munoz Jareno N (2009) Clinical and cognitive response to extended-release methylphenidate (Medikinet) in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: efficacy evaluation. Adv Ther 26:1097–1110CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Jaen A, Fernandez-Mayoralas DM, Pardos A, Calleja-Perez B, Munoz Jareno N (2009) Clinical and cognitive response to extended-release methylphenidate (Medikinet) in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: efficacy evaluation. Adv Ther 26:1097–1110CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Bédard ACV, Stein MA, Halperin JM, Krone B, Rajwan E, Newcorn JH (2015) Differential impact of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on sustained attention in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:40–48CrossRefPubMed Bédard ACV, Stein MA, Halperin JM, Krone B, Rajwan E, Newcorn JH (2015) Differential impact of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on sustained attention in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:40–48CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Teicher MH, Polcari A, McGreenery CE (2008) Utility of objective measures of activity and attention in the assessment of therapeutic response to stimulants in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 18:265–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Teicher MH, Polcari A, McGreenery CE (2008) Utility of objective measures of activity and attention in the assessment of therapeutic response to stimulants in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 18:265–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Fischer M (1991) Assessment of stimulant response in ADHD children using a refined multimethod clinical protocol. J Clin Child Psychol 25:121 Fischer M (1991) Assessment of stimulant response in ADHD children using a refined multimethod clinical protocol. J Clin Child Psychol 25:121
50.
go back to reference Greenberg L (1986) An objective measure of methylphenidate response: clinical use of the MCA. Psychopharmacol Bull 23:279–282 Greenberg L (1986) An objective measure of methylphenidate response: clinical use of the MCA. Psychopharmacol Bull 23:279–282
51.
go back to reference Teicher MH, Ito Y, Glod CA, Barber NI (1996) Objective measurement of hyperactivity and attentional problems in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:334–342CrossRefPubMed Teicher MH, Ito Y, Glod CA, Barber NI (1996) Objective measurement of hyperactivity and attentional problems in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:334–342CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Teicher MH (1995) Actigraphy and motion analysis: new tools for psychiatry. Harv Rev Psychiatry 3:18–35CrossRefPubMed Teicher MH (1995) Actigraphy and motion analysis: new tools for psychiatry. Harv Rev Psychiatry 3:18–35CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Alderson RM, Rapport MD, Kasper LJ, Sarver DE, Kofler MJ (2012) Hyperactivity in boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): the association between deficient behavioral inhibition, attentional processes, and objectively measured activity. Child Neuropsychol 18:487–505CrossRefPubMed Alderson RM, Rapport MD, Kasper LJ, Sarver DE, Kofler MJ (2012) Hyperactivity in boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): the association between deficient behavioral inhibition, attentional processes, and objectively measured activity. Child Neuropsychol 18:487–505CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Dane AV, Schachar RJ, Tannock R (2000) Does actigraphy differentiate ADHD subtypes in a clinical research setting? J Am Acad 39:752–760CrossRef Dane AV, Schachar RJ, Tannock R (2000) Does actigraphy differentiate ADHD subtypes in a clinical research setting? J Am Acad 39:752–760CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Wood AC, Asherson P, Rijsdijk F, Kuntsi J (2009) Is overactivity a core feature in ADHD? Familial and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of mechanically assessed activity level. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 48:1023–1030CrossRef Wood AC, Asherson P, Rijsdijk F, Kuntsi J (2009) Is overactivity a core feature in ADHD? Familial and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of mechanically assessed activity level. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 48:1023–1030CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Halperin JM, Matier K, Bedi G, Sharma V, Newcorn JH (1992) Specificity of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity to the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 31:190–196CrossRef Halperin JM, Matier K, Bedi G, Sharma V, Newcorn JH (1992) Specificity of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity to the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 31:190–196CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Inoue K, Nadaoka T, Oiji A, Morioka Y, Totsuka S, Kanbayashi Y, Hukui T (1998) Clinical evaluation of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by objective quantitative measures. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 28:179–188CrossRef Inoue K, Nadaoka T, Oiji A, Morioka Y, Totsuka S, Kanbayashi Y, Hukui T (1998) Clinical evaluation of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by objective quantitative measures. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 28:179–188CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Porrino LJ, Rapoport JL, Behar D, Sceery W, Ismond DR, Bunney WE Jr (1983) A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys. I. Comparison with normal controls. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:681–687CrossRefPubMed Porrino LJ, Rapoport JL, Behar D, Sceery W, Ismond DR, Bunney WE Jr (1983) A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys. I. Comparison with normal controls. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:681–687CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Halperin JM, Newcorn JH, Matier K, Sharma V, McKAY KE, Schwartz S (1993) Discriminant validity of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 32:1038–1043CrossRef Halperin JM, Newcorn JH, Matier K, Sharma V, McKAY KE, Schwartz S (1993) Discriminant validity of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 32:1038–1043CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Hall S, Halperin J, Schwartz S, Newcorn J (1997) Behavioral and executive functions in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. J Atten Disord 1:235–243CrossRef Hall S, Halperin J, Schwartz S, Newcorn J (1997) Behavioral and executive functions in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. J Atten Disord 1:235–243CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Marks DJ, Himelstein J, Newcorn JH, Halperin JM (1999) Identification of AD/HD subtypes using laboratory-based measures: a cluster analysis. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:167–175CrossRefPubMed Marks DJ, Himelstein J, Newcorn JH, Halperin JM (1999) Identification of AD/HD subtypes using laboratory-based measures: a cluster analysis. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:167–175CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Rajendran K, O’Neill S, Marks DJ, Halperin JM (2015) Latent profile analysis of neuropsychological measures to determine preschoolers’ risk for ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12434 Rajendran K, O’Neill S, Marks DJ, Halperin JM (2015) Latent profile analysis of neuropsychological measures to determine preschoolers’ risk for ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. doi:10.​1111/​jcpp.​12434
63.
go back to reference Rapoport JL, Tepsic PN, Grice J, Johnson C, Langer D (1980) Decreased motor activity of hyperactive children on dextroamphetamine during active gym program. Psychiat Res 2:225–229CrossRef Rapoport JL, Tepsic PN, Grice J, Johnson C, Langer D (1980) Decreased motor activity of hyperactive children on dextroamphetamine during active gym program. Psychiat Res 2:225–229CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Konrad K, Gunther T, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Herpertz-Dahlmann B (2005) Clinical evaluation of subjective and objective changes in motor activity and attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a double-blind methylphenidate trial. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 15:180–190CrossRefPubMed Konrad K, Gunther T, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Herpertz-Dahlmann B (2005) Clinical evaluation of subjective and objective changes in motor activity and attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a double-blind methylphenidate trial. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 15:180–190CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Borcherding BG, Keysor CS, Cooper TB, Rapoport JL (1989) Differential effects of methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine on the motor activity level of hyperactive children. Neuropsychopharmacol 2:255–263CrossRef Borcherding BG, Keysor CS, Cooper TB, Rapoport JL (1989) Differential effects of methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine on the motor activity level of hyperactive children. Neuropsychopharmacol 2:255–263CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Donnelly M, Rapoport JL, Potter WZ, Oliver J, Keysor CS, Murphy DL (1989) Fenfluramine and dextroamphetamine treatment of childhood hyperactivity: clinical and biochemical findings. Arch Gen Psychiat 46:205–212CrossRefPubMed Donnelly M, Rapoport JL, Potter WZ, Oliver J, Keysor CS, Murphy DL (1989) Fenfluramine and dextroamphetamine treatment of childhood hyperactivity: clinical and biochemical findings. Arch Gen Psychiat 46:205–212CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Porrino LJ, Rapoport JL, Behar D, Ismond DR, Bunney WE (1983) A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys: II. Stimulant drug effects. Arch Gen Psychiat 40:688–693CrossRefPubMed Porrino LJ, Rapoport JL, Behar D, Ismond DR, Bunney WE (1983) A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys: II. Stimulant drug effects. Arch Gen Psychiat 40:688–693CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference De Crescenzo F, Armando M, Mazzone L, Ciliberto M, Sciannamea M, Figueroa C, Janiri L, Quested D, Vicari S (2014) The use of actigraphy in the monitoring of methylphenidate versus placebo in ADHD: a meta-analysis. ADHD Atten Defic Hyperact Disord 6:49–58CrossRefPubMed De Crescenzo F, Armando M, Mazzone L, Ciliberto M, Sciannamea M, Figueroa C, Janiri L, Quested D, Vicari S (2014) The use of actigraphy in the monitoring of methylphenidate versus placebo in ADHD: a meta-analysis. ADHD Atten Defic Hyperact Disord 6:49–58CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference O’Mahony N, Florentino-Liano B, Carballo JJ, Baca-García E, Rodríguez AA (2014) Objective diagnosis of ADHD using IMUs. Med Eng Phys 36:922–926CrossRefPubMed O’Mahony N, Florentino-Liano B, Carballo JJ, Baca-García E, Rodríguez AA (2014) Objective diagnosis of ADHD using IMUs. Med Eng Phys 36:922–926CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Reh V, Schmidt M, Lam L, Schimmelmann BG, Hebebrand J, Rief W, Christiansen H (2013) Behavioral assessment of core ADHD symptoms using the QbTest. J Atten Disord. doi:10.1177/1087054712472981 Reh V, Schmidt M, Lam L, Schimmelmann BG, Hebebrand J, Rief W, Christiansen H (2013) Behavioral assessment of core ADHD symptoms using the QbTest. J Atten Disord. doi:10.​1177/​1087054712472981​
71.
go back to reference Heiser P, Frey J, Smidt J, Sommerlad C, Wehmeier P, Hebebrand J, Remschmidt H (2004) Objective measurement of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention in children with hyperkinetic disorders before and after treatment with methylphenidate. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:100–104CrossRefPubMed Heiser P, Frey J, Smidt J, Sommerlad C, Wehmeier P, Hebebrand J, Remschmidt H (2004) Objective measurement of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention in children with hyperkinetic disorders before and after treatment with methylphenidate. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:100–104CrossRefPubMed
72.
go back to reference Wehmeier PM, Schacht A, Wolff C, Otto WR, Dittmann RW, Banaschewski T (2011) Neuropsychological outcomes across the day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with atomoxetine: results from a placebo-controlled study using a computer-based continuous performance test combined with an infra-red motion-tracking device. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 21:433–444CrossRefPubMed Wehmeier PM, Schacht A, Wolff C, Otto WR, Dittmann RW, Banaschewski T (2011) Neuropsychological outcomes across the day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with atomoxetine: results from a placebo-controlled study using a computer-based continuous performance test combined with an infra-red motion-tracking device. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 21:433–444CrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Ramtvedt BE, Sundet K (2014) Relationships between computer-based testing and behavioral ratings in the assessment of attention and activity in a pediatric ADHD stimulant crossover trial. Clin Neuropsychol 28:1146–1161CrossRefPubMed Ramtvedt BE, Sundet K (2014) Relationships between computer-based testing and behavioral ratings in the assessment of attention and activity in a pediatric ADHD stimulant crossover trial. Clin Neuropsychol 28:1146–1161CrossRefPubMed
74.
go back to reference Wehmeier PM, Schacht A, Ulberstad F, Lehmann M, Schneider-Fresenius C, Lehmkuhl G, Dittmann RW, Banaschewski T (2012) Does atomoxetine improve executive function, inhibitory control, and hyperactivity? Results from a placebo-controlled trial using quantitative measurement technology. J Clin Psychopharmacol 32:653–660CrossRefPubMed Wehmeier PM, Schacht A, Ulberstad F, Lehmann M, Schneider-Fresenius C, Lehmkuhl G, Dittmann RW, Banaschewski T (2012) Does atomoxetine improve executive function, inhibitory control, and hyperactivity? Results from a placebo-controlled trial using quantitative measurement technology. J Clin Psychopharmacol 32:653–660CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Gunther T, Kahraman-Lanzerath B, Knospe EL, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Konrad K (2012) Modulation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms by short- and long-acting methylphenidate over the course of a day. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 22:131–138CrossRefPubMed Gunther T, Kahraman-Lanzerath B, Knospe EL, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Konrad K (2012) Modulation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms by short- and long-acting methylphenidate over the course of a day. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 22:131–138CrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference Ramtvedt BE, Røinås E, Aabech HS, Sundet KS (2013) Clinical gains from including both dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate in stimulant trials. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 23:597–604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ramtvedt BE, Røinås E, Aabech HS, Sundet KS (2013) Clinical gains from including both dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate in stimulant trials. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 23:597–604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review
Authors
Charlotte L. Hall
Althea Z. Valentine
Madeleine J. Groom
Gemma M. Walker
Kapil Sayal
David Daley
Chris Hollis
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1018-8827
Electronic ISSN: 1435-165X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0798-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 7/2016 Go to the issue