Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 4/2006

01-06-2006 | ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10–19 years

Age and gender specific results of the extended SDQ-questionnaire

Authors: Betty Van Roy, Berit Grøholt, Sonja Heyerdahl, Jocelyne Clench-Aas

Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

This study reports young people’s assessment of own problems and strengths from a Norwegian survey (n=29,631, age range 10–19), based on the self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (response rate 84.3%). Differences according to the age and gender are illuminated. Girls reported most emotional problems and boys most conduct and peer problems. Compared to other countries, Norwegian adolescents reported more hyperactive behaviour. Total problem scores were highest in early-adolescence for boys (Mean=10.8, SD=6.1), and for girls it is in late adolescence (Mean 11.3, SD=5.2). One third of the subjects reported at least minor perceived difficulties. All symptom scales were strongly associated with perceived difficulties, impact and burden to others (P<0.001) with significant gender and age effects. Impact scores were included in the estimate of possible caseness. Combining symptom scores and impact scores, 3.7% of the sample was defined as a high risk group, while 8.8% needed special attention from mental health services. The results also suggested that SDQ could be a valuable screening instrument for older adolescents.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Becker A, Hagenberg N, Roessner V, Woerner W, Rothenberger A (2004) Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II17–II24PubMed Becker A, Hagenberg N, Roessner V, Woerner W, Rothenberger A (2004) Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II17–II24PubMed
2.
go back to reference Biederman J, Mick E, Faraone SV, Braaten E, Doyle A, Spencer T, Wilens TE, Frazier E, Johnson MA (2002) Influence of gender on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatric clinic. Am J Psychiatry 159:36–42PubMedCrossRef Biederman J, Mick E, Faraone SV, Braaten E, Doyle A, Spencer T, Wilens TE, Frazier E, Johnson MA (2002) Influence of gender on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatric clinic. Am J Psychiatry 159:36–42PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deater-Deckard K (2001) Annotation: recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42:565–579PubMedCrossRef Deater-Deckard K (2001) Annotation: recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42:565–579PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ford T, Goodman R, Meltzer H (2003) The British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Survey 1999: the prevalence of DSM-IV disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:1203–1211PubMedCrossRef Ford T, Goodman R, Meltzer H (2003) The British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Survey 1999: the prevalence of DSM-IV disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:1203–1211PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586PubMed Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586PubMed
6.
go back to reference Goodman R (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:791–799PubMedCrossRef Goodman R (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:791–799PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:1337–1345PubMedCrossRef Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:1337–1345PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goodman R, Ford T, Corbin T, Meltzer H (2004) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) multi-informant algorithm to screen looked-after children for psychiatric disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II25–II31PubMedCrossRef Goodman R, Ford T, Corbin T, Meltzer H (2004) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) multi-informant algorithm to screen looked-after children for psychiatric disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II25–II31PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2000) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 177:534–539PubMedCrossRef Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2000) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 177:534–539PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2003) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:166–172PubMedCrossRef Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2003) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:166–172PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:173–177PubMedCrossRef Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:173–177PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goodman R, Scott S (1999) Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:17–24PubMedCrossRef Goodman R, Scott S (1999) Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:17–24PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hawes DJ, Dadds MR (2004) Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 38:644–651PubMedCrossRef Hawes DJ, Dadds MR (2004) Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 38:644–651PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koskelainen M, Sourander A, Vauras M (2001) Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a community sample of Finnish adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 10:180–185PubMedCrossRef Koskelainen M, Sourander A, Vauras M (2001) Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a community sample of Finnish adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 10:180–185PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Malmberg M, Rydell AM, Smedje H (2003) Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe). Nord J Psychiatry 57:357–363PubMedCrossRef Malmberg M, Rydell AM, Smedje H (2003) Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe). Nord J Psychiatry 57:357–363PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ministry of Education and Research (2004) The Development of Education 2000–2004. National Report of Norway Ministry of Education and Research (2004) The Development of Education 2000–2004. National Report of Norway
17.
go back to reference Muris P, Meesters C, van den BF (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12:1–8PubMedCrossRef Muris P, Meesters C, van den BF (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12:1–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nøvik, T (1999) Validity and Use of the Child Behaviour Checklist in Norwegian Children and Adolescents: Table 1: Previous Norwegian epidemiological studies. University in Oslo, Department Group of Psychiatry Nøvik, T (1999) Validity and Use of the Child Behaviour Checklist in Norwegian Children and Adolescents: Table 1: Previous Norwegian epidemiological studies. University in Oslo, Department Group of Psychiatry
19.
go back to reference Obel C, Heiervang E, Rodriguez A, Heyerdahl S, Smedje H, Sourander A, Guethmundsson OO, Clench-Aas J, Christensen E, Heian F, Mathiesen KS, Magnusson P, Njarethvik U, Koskelainen M, Ronning JA, Stormark KM, Olsen J (2004) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II32–II39PubMedCrossRef Obel C, Heiervang E, Rodriguez A, Heyerdahl S, Smedje H, Sourander A, Guethmundsson OO, Clench-Aas J, Christensen E, Heian F, Mathiesen KS, Magnusson P, Njarethvik U, Koskelainen M, Ronning JA, Stormark KM, Olsen J (2004) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II32–II39PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Quinn P, Wigal S (2004) Perceptions of girls and ADHD: results from a national survey. MedGenMed 6:2PubMed Quinn P, Wigal S (2004) Perceptions of girls and ADHD: results from a national survey. MedGenMed 6:2PubMed
21.
go back to reference Rødje K, Clench-Aas J, Van-Roy B, Holmboe O, Müller AM (2004) Helseprofil for barn og ungdom i Akershus-Ungdomsrapporten. Lørenskog, Norway Rødje K, Clench-Aas J, Van-Roy B, Holmboe O, Müller AM (2004) Helseprofil for barn og ungdom i Akershus-Ungdomsrapporten. Lørenskog, Norway
22.
go back to reference Rødje K, Clench-Aas J, Van-Roy B, Holmboe O, Müller AM (2004) Helseprofil for barn og ungdom i Akershus-Barnerapporten. Lørenskog, Norway Rødje K, Clench-Aas J, Van-Roy B, Holmboe O, Müller AM (2004) Helseprofil for barn og ungdom i Akershus-Barnerapporten. Lørenskog, Norway
23.
go back to reference Ronning JA, Handegaard BH, Sourander A, Morch WT (2004) The Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:73–82PubMedCrossRef Ronning JA, Handegaard BH, Sourander A, Morch WT (2004) The Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13:73–82PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rothenberger A, Woerner W (2004) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – evaluations and applications. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II1–II2PubMedCrossRef Rothenberger A, Woerner W (2004) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) – evaluations and applications. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II1–II2PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Smedje H, Broman JE, Hetta J, von Knorring AL (1999) Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire”. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 8:63–70PubMedCrossRef Smedje H, Broman JE, Hetta J, von Knorring AL (1999) Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire”. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 8:63–70PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Verhulst FC, Achenbach TM, van der EJ, Erol N, Lambert MC, Leung PW, Silva MA, Zilber N, Zubrick SR (2003) Comparisons of problems reported by youths from seven countries. Am J Psychiatry 160:1479–1485PubMedCrossRef Verhulst FC, Achenbach TM, van der EJ, Erol N, Lambert MC, Leung PW, Silva MA, Zilber N, Zubrick SR (2003) Comparisons of problems reported by youths from seven countries. Am J Psychiatry 160:1479–1485PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Woerner W, Becker A, Friedrich C, Klasen H, Goodman R, Rothenberger A (2002) Normal values and evaluation of the German parents’ version of Strengths and DIfficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): results of a representative field study. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 30:105–112PubMedCrossRef Woerner W, Becker A, Friedrich C, Klasen H, Goodman R, Rothenberger A (2002) Normal values and evaluation of the German parents’ version of Strengths and DIfficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): results of a representative field study. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 30:105–112PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10–19 years
Age and gender specific results of the extended SDQ-questionnaire
Authors
Betty Van Roy
Berit Grøholt
Sonja Heyerdahl
Jocelyne Clench-Aas
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Steinkopff-Verlag
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1018-8827
Electronic ISSN: 1435-165X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-005-0521-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 4/2006 Go to the issue

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Refeeding oedema