Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2019

Open Access 01-03-2019 | Original Article

Micro-CT evaluation of the cortical bone micro-architecture in the anterior and posterior maxilla and the maxillary sinus floor

Authors: Kristina Bertl, Danijel Domic, Lena Hirtler, Patrick Heimel, Azadeh Esfandeyari, Andreas Stavropoulos, Christian Ulm

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To perform a within-subject comparison of the cortical bone micro-architecture of the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) to that of the buccal aspect of the anterior and posterior maxilla.

Methods

Micro-CT scans of the buccal aspect of the anterior and posterior maxilla and of the MSF in 14 human anatomical specimens were recorded. Within-subject comparisons were performed for cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and porosity (Ct.Po), average pore volume (AvgPo.V), and pore density (Po.Dn).

Results

The MSF presented the lowest and the anterior maxilla the highest Ct.Th, while Ct.Po was significantly higher at the MSF compared to the posterior maxilla (p = 0.021). No relevant differences were recorded for AvgPo.V and Po.Dn among regions (p > 0.067). Further, an increased Ct.Th at the MSF was significantly associated with a lower Po.Dn, while a higher Ct.Th and an increased AvgPo.V in the anterior maxilla were associated with a higher Ct.Th and an increased AvgPo.V, respectively, in the posterior maxilla and MSF. Finally, within each region, the AvgPo.V was associated positively with Ct.Po and negatively with Po.Dn.

Conclusions

The cortical bone of the MSF is slightly less thick and slightly more porous compared to the cortical bone at the buccal aspect of the anterior and posterior maxilla.

Clinical relevance

During lateral and vertical bone augmentation procedures, the cortical recipient bone is perforated several times to open the bone marrow compartment to facilitate provision of osteoinductive cells and molecules in the augmented space. Whether it is meaningful to approach the MSF in a similar way during MSF augmentation procedures or whether the slightly more porous structure of the MSF observed herein reduces the cortical barrier function already sufficiently has to be assessed in future clinical trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atwood DA (1963) Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 13:810–824CrossRef Atwood DA (1963) Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 13:810–824CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cawood JI, Howell RA (1988) A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:232–236CrossRefPubMed Cawood JI, Howell RA (1988) A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:232–236CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gruber R (2012) Biologic aspects of sinus augmentation. In: The percrestal sinus lift – from illusion to reality, ed. Quintessenze Publishing Co. Ltd., London, pp 20–43 Gruber R (2012) Biologic aspects of sinus augmentation. In: The percrestal sinus lift – from illusion to reality, ed. Quintessenze Publishing Co. Ltd., London, pp 20–43
6.
go back to reference Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S (1990) Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1:22–32CrossRefPubMed Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S (1990) Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1:22–32CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Meloni SM, Jovanovic SA, Urban I, Canullo L, Pisano M, Tallarico M (2016) Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1:1 ratio of particulated xenograft and autologous bone: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12429 CrossRefPubMed Meloni SM, Jovanovic SA, Urban I, Canullo L, Pisano M, Tallarico M (2016) Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1:1 ratio of particulated xenograft and autologous bone: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19:38–45. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​cid.​12429 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E, Wenzel A (2015) Remodeling of cortical and corticocancellous fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts--a radiographic and histomorphometric comparison to autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:747–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12343 CrossRefPubMed Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E, Wenzel A (2015) Remodeling of cortical and corticocancellous fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts--a radiographic and histomorphometric comparison to autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:747–752. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​clr.​12343 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE 9:62–66 Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE 9:62–66
18.
go back to reference Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 CrossRef Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​nmeth.​2019 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jungner M, Cricchio G, Salata LA, Sennerby L, Lundqvist C, Hultcrantz M, Lundgren S (2015) On the early mechanisms of bone formation after maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental histological and immunohistochemical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12218 CrossRefPubMed Jungner M, Cricchio G, Salata LA, Sennerby L, Lundqvist C, Hultcrantz M, Lundgren S (2015) On the early mechanisms of bone formation after maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental histological and immunohistochemical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:1092–1102. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​cid.​12218 CrossRefPubMed
23.
25.
go back to reference Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Ottonelli R, Berton F, Perinetti G, Traini T (2018) New bone formation after transcrestal sinus floor elevation was influenced by sinus cavity dimensions: a prospective histologic and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 29:465–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13144 CrossRefPubMed Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Ottonelli R, Berton F, Perinetti G, Traini T (2018) New bone formation after transcrestal sinus floor elevation was influenced by sinus cavity dimensions: a prospective histologic and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 29:465–479. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​clr.​13144 CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bertl K, Mick RB, Heimel P, Gahleitner A, Stavropoulos A, Ulm C (2018) Is it possible to meaningfully classify the maxillary sinus based on its bucco-palatal width? Clin Oral Implants Res in press Bertl K, Mick RB, Heimel P, Gahleitner A, Stavropoulos A, Ulm C (2018) Is it possible to meaningfully classify the maxillary sinus based on its bucco-palatal width? Clin Oral Implants Res in press
Metadata
Title
Micro-CT evaluation of the cortical bone micro-architecture in the anterior and posterior maxilla and the maxillary sinus floor
Authors
Kristina Bertl
Danijel Domic
Lena Hirtler
Patrick Heimel
Azadeh Esfandeyari
Andreas Stavropoulos
Christian Ulm
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2573-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2019 Go to the issue