Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model

Authors: Norbert Krämer, Miriam Schmidt, Susanne Lücker, Eugen Domann, Roland Frankenberger

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different glass ionomer cements on secondary caries inhibition in a fully automated in vitro biofilm model.

Materials and methods

One hundred and twenty-four extracted third molars received class V cavities and were filled with one conventional (Ketac Molar/KM), and two resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Photac Fil/PF, Ketac N100/KN, 3M Espe). A bonded resin composite (Single Bond Plus/Filtek Supreme XTE) served as control. After 14 days water storage at 37 °C, specimens were thermocycled (10,000 × 5/55 °C). Over a period of 10 days, specimens were subjected to cariogenic challenge for 3/4/6 h/day. Demineralization was caused by Streptococcus mutans (DSM 20523) alternatingly being rinsed over specimens using artificial saliva. After biological loading, teeth were cut longitudinally and demineralization depths were evaluated at the margins and at a distance of 0.5 mm from the margins using fluorescence microscopy. Marginal quality was investigated under a SEM at ×200 magnification.

Results

Four-hour demineralization depths were for enamel margins (EM), enamel (E), dentin margin (DM), and dentin (D) (μm ± SD): KM: EM 12 ± 8, E 33 ± 7, DM 56 ± 11, D 79 ± 6; PF: EM 19 ± 13, E 34 ± 13, DM 53 ± 10, D 77 ± 12; and KN: EM 26 ± 5, E 38 ± 6, DM 57 ± 11, D 71 ± 7. For all glass ionomer cements (GICs), demineralization depth at the margins was less compared to 0.5 mm distance, with demineralization depth having been correlated to duration of cariogenic challenge (ANOVA [mod. LSD, p < 0.05]). Compared to the bonded resin composite, all GICs exhibited caries inhibition at restoration margins in enamel and dentin.

Conclusions

Fluoride-releasing GIC materials exhibit a secondary caries inhibiting effect in vitro.

Clinical relevance

Glass ionomer cements have a higher secondary caries inhibiting effect than resin composites.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Kramer N (2014) Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results. Clin Oral Investig 18:125–137CrossRefPubMed Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Kramer N (2014) Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results. Clin Oral Investig 18:125–137CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 13:41D–54DPubMed Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 13:41D–54DPubMed
3.
go back to reference Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29:481–508PubMed Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29:481–508PubMed
4.
go back to reference Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW (2014) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:943–949CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW (2014) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:943–949CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Barata JS, Casagrande L, Pitoni CM, de Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Groismann S (2012) Influence of gaps in adhesive restorations in the development of secondary caries lesions: an in situ evaluation. Am J Dent 25:244–248PubMed Barata JS, Casagrande L, Pitoni CM, de Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Groismann S (2012) Influence of gaps in adhesive restorations in the development of secondary caries lesions: an in situ evaluation. Am J Dent 25:244–248PubMed
6.
go back to reference Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS et al (2011) 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater 27:955–963CrossRefPubMed Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS et al (2011) 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater 27:955–963CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM (2007) Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 1):107–116PubMed Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM (2007) Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 1):107–116PubMed
8.
go back to reference Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235PubMed Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cury JA, Ten Cate JM (2009) Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res 43:97–102CrossRefPubMed Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cury JA, Ten Cate JM (2009) Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res 43:97–102CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28:87–101CrossRefPubMed Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28:87–101CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dennison JB, Sarrett DC (2012) Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins. J Oral Rehabil 39:301–318CrossRefPubMed Dennison JB, Sarrett DC (2012) Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins. J Oral Rehabil 39:301–318CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Garcia-Godoy F, Haberlein I, Meier B, Frankenberger R (2007) Determination of caries risk at resin composite margins. Am J Dent 20:59–64PubMed Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Garcia-Godoy F, Haberlein I, Meier B, Frankenberger R (2007) Determination of caries risk at resin composite margins. Am J Dent 20:59–64PubMed
13.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2009) Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 25:960–968CrossRefPubMed Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2009) Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 25:960–968CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881CrossRefPubMed Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Truin GJ, Bronkhorst EM, de Soet JJ, Cenci MS, Huysmans MC (2014) The influence of different restorative materials on secondary caries development in situ. J Dent 42:1171–1177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Truin GJ, Bronkhorst EM, de Soet JJ, Cenci MS, Huysmans MC (2014) The influence of different restorative materials on secondary caries development in situ. J Dent 42:1171–1177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference van Dijken JW, Pallesen U (2014) A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 16:585–592PubMed van Dijken JW, Pallesen U (2014) A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 16:585–592PubMed
17.
go back to reference van Dijken JW, Pallesen U (2015) Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 17:81–88PubMed van Dijken JW, Pallesen U (2015) Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 17:81–88PubMed
18.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A (2000) Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324–330PubMed Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A (2000) Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324–330PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 13:41D–54DPubMed Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 13:41D–54DPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kidd EA, Beighton D (1996) Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 75:1942–1946CrossRefPubMed Kidd EA, Beighton D (1996) Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 75:1942–1946CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Krämer N, Möhwald M, Lücker S, Domann E, Zorzin JI, Rosentritt M, Frankenberger R (2015) Effect of microparticulate silver addition in dental adhesives on secondary caries in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 19:1673–1681CrossRefPubMed Krämer N, Möhwald M, Lücker S, Domann E, Zorzin JI, Rosentritt M, Frankenberger R (2015) Effect of microparticulate silver addition in dental adhesives on secondary caries in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 19:1673–1681CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Paradella TC, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO (2008) Ability of different restorative materials to prevent in situ secondary caries: analysis by polarized light-microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray. Eur J Oral Sci 116:375–380CrossRefPubMed Paradella TC, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO (2008) Ability of different restorative materials to prevent in situ secondary caries: analysis by polarized light-microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray. Eur J Oral Sci 116:375–380CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Paradella TC, de Sousa FA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO (2009) Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarized-light microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90:635–640CrossRefPubMed Paradella TC, de Sousa FA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO (2009) Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarized-light microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90:635–640CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Seemann R, Bizhang M, Kluck I, Loth J, Roulet JF (2005) A novel in vitro microbial-based model for studying caries formation—development and initial testing. Caries Res 39:185–190CrossRefPubMed Seemann R, Bizhang M, Kluck I, Loth J, Roulet JF (2005) A novel in vitro microbial-based model for studying caries formation—development and initial testing. Caries Res 39:185–190CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kopperud SE, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I (2012) Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure. Eur J Oral Sci 120:539–548CrossRefPubMed Kopperud SE, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I (2012) Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure. Eur J Oral Sci 120:539–548CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ertugrul F, Ates M, Brugger S (2008) Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine-containing glass ionomer cement. J Esthet Restor Dent 20:29–44CrossRefPubMed Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ertugrul F, Ates M, Brugger S (2008) Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine-containing glass ionomer cement. J Esthet Restor Dent 20:29–44CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr, Cury JA (1993) In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 27:280–284CrossRefPubMed Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr, Cury JA (1993) In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 27:280–284CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Cenci MS, Tenuta LM, Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Ten Cate JM, Cury JA (2008) Effect of microleakage and fluoride on enamel-dentine demineralization around restorations. Caries Res 42:369–379CrossRefPubMed Cenci MS, Tenuta LM, Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Ten Cate JM, Cury JA (2008) Effect of microleakage and fluoride on enamel-dentine demineralization around restorations. Caries Res 42:369–379CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference de Moraes MD, de Melo MA, Bezerra DD, Costa LS, Saboia VP, Rodrigues LK (2015) Clinical study of the caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations: aging versus the influence of fluoride dentifrice. J Investig Clin Dent, EPub ahead of print de Moraes MD, de Melo MA, Bezerra DD, Costa LS, Saboia VP, Rodrigues LK (2015) Clinical study of the caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations: aging versus the influence of fluoride dentifrice. J Investig Clin Dent, EPub ahead of print
30.
go back to reference Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou K, Papagodiannis Y (1994) Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Oper Dent 19:183–188PubMed Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou K, Papagodiannis Y (1994) Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Oper Dent 19:183–188PubMed
31.
go back to reference Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia E, Tolidis K (2003) Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials. J Oral Rehabil 30:1216–1222CrossRefPubMed Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia E, Tolidis K (2003) Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials. J Oral Rehabil 30:1216–1222CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hara AT, Turssi CP, Ando M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Zero DT, Rodrigues AL Jr, Serra MC, Cury JA (2006) Influence of fluoride-releasing restorative material on root dentine secondary caries in situ. Caries Res 40:435–439CrossRefPubMed Hara AT, Turssi CP, Ando M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Zero DT, Rodrigues AL Jr, Serra MC, Cury JA (2006) Influence of fluoride-releasing restorative material on root dentine secondary caries in situ. Caries Res 40:435–439CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Forsten L (1993) Clinical experience with glass ionomer for proximal fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 51:195–200CrossRefPubMed Forsten L (1993) Clinical experience with glass ionomer for proximal fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 51:195–200CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Diercke K, Lussi A, Kersten T, Seemann R (2009) Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model. Clin Oral Investig 13:439–444CrossRefPubMed Diercke K, Lussi A, Kersten T, Seemann R (2009) Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model. Clin Oral Investig 13:439–444CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Hayati F, Okada A, Kitasako Y, Tagami J, Matin K (2011) An artificial biofilm induced secondary caries model for in vitro studies. Aust Dent J 56:40–47CrossRefPubMed Hayati F, Okada A, Kitasako Y, Tagami J, Matin K (2011) An artificial biofilm induced secondary caries model for in vitro studies. Aust Dent J 56:40–47CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Sissons CH, Cutress TW (1987) In-vitro urea-dependent pH-changes by human salivary bacteria and dispersed, artificial-mouth, bacterial plaques. Arch Oral Biol 32:181–189CrossRefPubMed Sissons CH, Cutress TW (1987) In-vitro urea-dependent pH-changes by human salivary bacteria and dispersed, artificial-mouth, bacterial plaques. Arch Oral Biol 32:181–189CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Sissons CH, Cutress TW (1988) pH changes during simultaneous metabolism of urea and carbohydrate by human salivary bacteria in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 33:579–587CrossRefPubMed Sissons CH, Cutress TW (1988) pH changes during simultaneous metabolism of urea and carbohydrate by human salivary bacteria in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 33:579–587CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH, Newcombe RG, Clark MF (1993) An in vitro study into the effect of a bacterial artificial caries system on the enamel adjacent to composite and amalgam restorations. Caries Res 27:169–175CrossRefPubMed Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH, Newcombe RG, Clark MF (1993) An in vitro study into the effect of a bacterial artificial caries system on the enamel adjacent to composite and amalgam restorations. Caries Res 27:169–175CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Yu H, Wegehaupt FJ, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin T, Buchalla W (2009) Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. J Dent 37:913–922CrossRefPubMed Yu H, Wegehaupt FJ, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin T, Buchalla W (2009) Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. J Dent 37:913–922CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Swift EJ Jr, Bader JD, Shugars DA (1996) Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries. Quintessence Int 27:581–582PubMed Swift EJ Jr, Bader JD, Shugars DA (1996) Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries. Quintessence Int 27:581–582PubMed
41.
go back to reference Turssi CP, Hara AT, Domiciano SJ, Serra MC (2008) Study on the potential inhibition of root dentine wear adjacent to fluoride-containing restorations. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:47–51CrossRefPubMed Turssi CP, Hara AT, Domiciano SJ, Serra MC (2008) Study on the potential inhibition of root dentine wear adjacent to fluoride-containing restorations. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:47–51CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S (2011) Caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 12:5–14CrossRefPubMed Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S (2011) Caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 12:5–14CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Pendrys DG (2011) Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) may provide greater caries preventive effect compared with composite resin, but high-quality studies are needed. J Evid Based Dent Pract 11:180–182CrossRefPubMed Pendrys DG (2011) Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) may provide greater caries preventive effect compared with composite resin, but high-quality studies are needed. J Evid Based Dent Pract 11:180–182CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Pereira PN, Inokoshi S, Tagami J (1998) In vitro secondary caries inhibition around fluoride releasing materials. J Dent 26:505–510CrossRefPubMed Pereira PN, Inokoshi S, Tagami J (1998) In vitro secondary caries inhibition around fluoride releasing materials. J Dent 26:505–510CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Rao A, Rao A, Sudha P (2011) Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 29:202–204CrossRefPubMed Rao A, Rao A, Sudha P (2011) Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 29:202–204CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Lennon AM, Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T (2007) Approximal caries development in surfaces in contact with fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing restorative materials: an in situ study. Eur J Oral Sci 115:497–501CrossRefPubMed Lennon AM, Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T (2007) Approximal caries development in surfaces in contact with fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing restorative materials: an in situ study. Eur J Oral Sci 115:497–501CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F, Kramer N (2009) Clinical performance of viscous glass ionomer cement in posterior cavities over two years. Int J Dent 2009:781462CrossRefPubMed Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F, Kramer N (2009) Clinical performance of viscous glass ionomer cement in posterior cavities over two years. Int J Dent 2009:781462CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Mjör IA (1996) Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 27:171–174PubMed Mjör IA (1996) Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 27:171–174PubMed
Metadata
Title
Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model
Authors
Norbert Krämer
Miriam Schmidt
Susanne Lücker
Eugen Domann
Roland Frankenberger
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2184-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2018 Go to the issue