Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Article

Accounting for measurement reliability to improve the quality of inference in dental microhardness research: a worked example

Authors: Ivan Sever, Eva Klaric, Zrinka Tarle

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Dental microhardness experiments are influenced by unobserved factors related to the varying tooth characteristics that affect measurement reproducibility. This paper explores the appropriate analytical tools for modeling different sources of unobserved variability to reduce the biases encountered and increase the validity of microhardness studies.

Materials and methods

The enamel microhardness of human third molars was measured by Vickers diamond. The effects of five bleaching agents—10, 16, and 30 % carbamide peroxide, and 25 and 38 % hydrogen peroxide—were examined, as well as the effect of artificial saliva and amorphous calcium phosphate. To account for both between- and within-tooth heterogeneity in evaluating treatment effects, the statistical analysis was performed in the mixed-effects framework, which also included the appropriate weighting procedure to adjust for confounding. The results were compared to those of the standard ANOVA model usually applied.

Results

The weighted mixed-effects model produced the parameter estimates of different magnitude and significance than the standard ANOVA model. The results of the former model were more intuitive, with more precise estimates and better fit.

Conclusions

Confounding could seriously bias the study outcomes, highlighting the need for more robust statistical procedures in dental research that account for the measurement reliability. The presented framework is more flexible and informative than existing analytical techniques and may improve the quality of inference in dental research.

Clinical relevance

Reported results could be misleading if underlying heterogeneity of microhardness measurements is not taken into account. The confidence in treatment outcomes could be increased by applying the framework presented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hannigan A, Lynch CD (2013) Statistical methodology in oral and dental research: pitfalls and recommendations. J Dent 41:385–392CrossRefPubMed Hannigan A, Lynch CD (2013) Statistical methodology in oral and dental research: pitfalls and recommendations. J Dent 41:385–392CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T, Pandis N (2013) Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals? J Dent 41:265–270CrossRefPubMed Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T, Pandis N (2013) Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals? J Dent 41:265–270CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Kunin AA, Evdokimova AY, Moiseeva NS (2015) Age-related differences of tooth enamel morphochemistry in health and dental caries. The EPMA Journal 6(3) Kunin AA, Evdokimova AY, Moiseeva NS (2015) Age-related differences of tooth enamel morphochemistry in health and dental caries. The EPMA Journal 6(3)
5.
6.
go back to reference Lia Mondelli RF, Garrido Gabriel TR, Piola Rizzante FA, Magalhaes AC, Soares Bombonatti JF, Ishikiriama SK (2015) Do different bleaching protocols affect the enamel microhardness? Eur J Dent 9:25–30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lia Mondelli RF, Garrido Gabriel TR, Piola Rizzante FA, Magalhaes AC, Soares Bombonatti JF, Ishikiriama SK (2015) Do different bleaching protocols affect the enamel microhardness? Eur J Dent 9:25–30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference China ALP, Souza NM, Gomes Y, Alexandrino LD, Silva CM (2014) Effect of fluoride gels on microhardness and surface roughness of bleached enamel. Open Dent J 8:188–193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral China ALP, Souza NM, Gomes Y, Alexandrino LD, Silva CM (2014) Effect of fluoride gels on microhardness and surface roughness of bleached enamel. Open Dent J 8:188–193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Joiner A, Thakker G, Cooper Y (2004) Evaluation of a 6% hydrogen peroxide tooth whitening gel on enamel and dentine microhardness in vitro. J Dent 32:27–34CrossRefPubMed Joiner A, Thakker G, Cooper Y (2004) Evaluation of a 6% hydrogen peroxide tooth whitening gel on enamel and dentine microhardness in vitro. J Dent 32:27–34CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rodrigues JA, Marchi GM, Ambrosano GMB, Heymann HO, Pimenta LA (2005) Microhardness evaluation of in situ vital bleaching on human dental enamel using a novel study design. Dent Mater 21:1059–1067CrossRefPubMed Rodrigues JA, Marchi GM, Ambrosano GMB, Heymann HO, Pimenta LA (2005) Microhardness evaluation of in situ vital bleaching on human dental enamel using a novel study design. Dent Mater 21:1059–1067CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mujdeci A, Gokay O (2006) Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 95:286–289CrossRefPubMed Mujdeci A, Gokay O (2006) Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 95:286–289CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Azer SS, Machado C, Sanchez E, Rashid R (2009) Effect of home bleaching systems on enamel nanohardness and elastic modulus. J Dent 37:185–190CrossRefPubMed Azer SS, Machado C, Sanchez E, Rashid R (2009) Effect of home bleaching systems on enamel nanohardness and elastic modulus. J Dent 37:185–190CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zantner C, Schwarzbach NB (2007) Surface microhardness of enamel after different home bleaching procedures. Dent Mater 23:243–250CrossRefPubMed Zantner C, Schwarzbach NB (2007) Surface microhardness of enamel after different home bleaching procedures. Dent Mater 23:243–250CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):244–268CrossRef Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):244–268CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Green WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey Green WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
16.
go back to reference Klaric E, Rakic M, Sever I, Milat O, Par M, Tarle Z (2015) Enamel and Dentin Microhardness and Chemical Composition After Experimental Light-activated Bleaching. Operative Dentistry 40(3) Klaric E, Rakic M, Sever I, Milat O, Par M, Tarle Z (2015) Enamel and Dentin Microhardness and Chemical Composition After Experimental Light-activated Bleaching. Operative Dentistry 40(3)
17.
go back to reference Porta M (2014) A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York Porta M (2014) A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York
18.
go back to reference Bresciani E, Wagner WC, Navarro MFL, Dickens SH, Peters MC (2010) In vivo dentin microhardness beneath a calcium-phosphate cement. J Dent Res 89(8):836–841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bresciani E, Wagner WC, Navarro MFL, Dickens SH, Peters MC (2010) In vivo dentin microhardness beneath a calcium-phosphate cement. J Dent Res 89(8):836–841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Park MH, Chilton NW (1987) Within-mouth correlations and reliabilities for probing depth and attachment level. J Periodontol 58(7):460–463CrossRefPubMed Fleiss JL, Park MH, Chilton NW (1987) Within-mouth correlations and reliabilities for probing depth and attachment level. J Periodontol 58(7):460–463CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Alves Rde V, Machion L, Andia DC, Casati MZ, Sallum AW, Sallum EA (2005) Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe. J Int Acad Periodontol 7(1):27–30PubMed Alves Rde V, Machion L, Andia DC, Casati MZ, Sallum AW, Sallum EA (2005) Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe. J Int Acad Periodontol 7(1):27–30PubMed
Metadata
Title
Accounting for measurement reliability to improve the quality of inference in dental microhardness research: a worked example
Authors
Ivan Sever
Eva Klaric
Zrinka Tarle
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1600-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2016 Go to the issue