Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Incidence of white spot lesions among patients treated with self- and conventional ligation systems

Authors: Mehmet Akin, Mucella Tezcan, Zehra Ileri, Faruk Ayhan

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of white spot lesions (WSLs) and its relationship with various patient and treatment variables, in patients treated with self-ligation and conventional ligation orthodontic bracket systems.

Methods

Two-hundred randomly selected patient records (136 female, 64 male) for self-ligation and (108 female, 92 male) for conventional ligation groups were examined to determine WSL development. In the self-ligation group, Damon 3MX (Ormco, Glendora, Calif) brackets had been used, and in the conventional ligation group, Equilibrium 2 (Dentaurum, Phorzeim, Germany) had been used. Labial surfaces of 24 teeth in the pre- and post-treatment photographic records were scored using the WSL index.

Results

The prevalence of patients who developed at least 1 WSL before treatment was 19 %, whereas after treatment, it was 49 % in the self-ligation and 54 % in the conventional ligation groups. Before treatment, the patients had only mild WSL, but after treatment, severe WSL and cavitation were observed in both groups. Bracket type, age, and hygiene care were significantly associated with new WSL development (P = 0.008, P = 0.004, P = 0.013, respectively).

Conclusion

Bracket type and more importantly, the hygiene care therapy provided appeared to influence the development of new WSLs. Ligation can promote plaque accumulation and thereby new WSL development in conventional bracket systems.

Clinical relevance

This article investigates the incidence of WSLs in patients treated with self-ligation and conventional ligation. The present study showed that incidence of WSL less in the self-ligation than in the conventional ligation but hygiene care was mostly important factor in developed WSL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Featherstone D (2004) The continuum of dental caries—evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res 83:C39–C42PubMedCrossRef Featherstone D (2004) The continuum of dental caries—evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res 83:C39–C42PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ogaard B, Rølla G, Arends J (1988) Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:68–73PubMedCrossRef Ogaard B, Rølla G, Arends J (1988) Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:68–73PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chapman JA, Robersts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzales-Cabezas C (2010) Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:188–194PubMedCrossRef Chapman JA, Robersts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzales-Cabezas C (2010) Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:188–194PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS (2006) Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, 3rd ed. Hanover Park, Ill: Quintessence Publishing: 2–4 Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS (2006) Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, 3rd ed. Hanover Park, Ill: Quintessence Publishing: 2–4
5.
6.
go back to reference Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ (1982) Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 81:93–98PubMedCrossRef Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ (1982) Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 81:93–98PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mizrahi E (1983) Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 84:323–331PubMedCrossRef Mizrahi E (1983) Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 84:323–331PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Richter AE, Arruda AO, Peters MC, Sohn W (2011) Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:657–664PubMedCrossRef Richter AE, Arruda AO, Peters MC, Sohn W (2011) Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:657–664PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N (1991) Salivary streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:35–37PubMedCrossRef Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N (1991) Salivary streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:35–37PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Peros K, Mestrovic S, Anic-Milosevic S, Slaj M (2011) Salivary microbial and nonmicrobial parameters in children with fixed orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 81:901–906PubMedCrossRef Peros K, Mestrovic S, Anic-Milosevic S, Slaj M (2011) Salivary microbial and nonmicrobial parameters in children with fixed orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 81:901–906PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, Thunold K, Selvig KA (2001) Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod 23:475–484PubMedCrossRef Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, Thunold K, Selvig KA (2001) Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod 23:475–484PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Garcez AS, Suzuki SS, Ribeiro MS, Mada EY, Freitas AZ, Suzuki H (2011) Biofilm retention by 3 methods of ligation on orthodontic brackets: a microbiologic and optical coherence tomography analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:193–198CrossRef Garcez AS, Suzuki SS, Ribeiro MS, Mada EY, Freitas AZ, Suzuki H (2011) Biofilm retention by 3 methods of ligation on orthodontic brackets: a microbiologic and optical coherence tomography analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:193–198CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Keles K (2010) Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength After Remineralization of Enamel Subsurface Lesion by CPP-ACP: In Vitro Study [doctoral thesis]. Adana, Turkey: University of Cukurova Keles K (2010) Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength After Remineralization of Enamel Subsurface Lesion by CPP-ACP: In Vitro Study [doctoral thesis]. Adana, Turkey: University of Cukurova
14.
go back to reference Reynolds EC (1987) The prevention of sub-surface demineralization of bovine enamel and change in plaque composition by casein in an intra-oral model. J Dent Res 66:1120–1127PubMedCrossRef Reynolds EC (1987) The prevention of sub-surface demineralization of bovine enamel and change in plaque composition by casein in an intra-oral model. J Dent Res 66:1120–1127PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Griswold PG (1988) The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:29–37PubMedCrossRef Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Griswold PG (1988) The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:29–37PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pancherz H, Muhlich DP (1997) Entwicklung von karies bei kieferorthopadischer behandlung mit festsitzenden apparaturen—ein vergleich von z€ahnen mit und ohne kariesvorsch€adigungen. Kieferorthop 11:139–144 Pancherz H, Muhlich DP (1997) Entwicklung von karies bei kieferorthopadischer behandlung mit festsitzenden apparaturen—ein vergleich von z€ahnen mit und ohne kariesvorsch€adigungen. Kieferorthop 11:139–144
18.
go back to reference Øgaard B (1989) Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:423–427PubMedCrossRef Øgaard B (1989) Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:423–427PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Benson PE (2008) Evaluation of white spot lesions on teeth with orthodontic brackets. Semin Orthod 14:200–208CrossRef Benson PE (2008) Evaluation of white spot lesions on teeth with orthodontic brackets. Semin Orthod 14:200–208CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ellwood R (1993) Dental enamel opacities and the relationship to dental caries [thesis]. Cork, Ireland: University College Cork Ellwood R (1993) Dental enamel opacities and the relationship to dental caries [thesis]. Cork, Ireland: University College Cork
21.
go back to reference Enia M, Bock N, Ruf S (2011) White-spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: a challenge for clinical excellence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:e17–e24CrossRef Enia M, Bock N, Ruf S (2011) White-spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: a challenge for clinical excellence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:e17–e24CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunselloy JC, Lindauer SJ (2011) Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 81:206–210PubMedCrossRef Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunselloy JC, Lindauer SJ (2011) Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 81:206–210PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Artun J, Brobakken BO (1986) Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod 8:229–234PubMedCrossRef Artun J, Brobakken BO (1986) Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod 8:229–234PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Banks PA, Richmond S (1994) Enamel sealants: a clinical evaluation of their value during fixed appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 16:19–25PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Richmond S (1994) Enamel sealants: a clinical evaluation of their value during fixed appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 16:19–25PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lovrov S, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U (2007) Enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment—incidence and correlation to various oral-hygiene parameters. J Orofac Orthop 68:353–363PubMedCrossRef Lovrov S, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U (2007) Enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment—incidence and correlation to various oral-hygiene parameters. J Orofac Orthop 68:353–363PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Axelsson P.(1999) An introduction to risk prediction and preventive dentistry. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence. p. 107-11 Axelsson P.(1999) An introduction to risk prediction and preventive dentistry. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence. p. 107-11
27.
go back to reference Zimmer B, Rottwinkel Y (2004) Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:318–324PubMedCrossRef Zimmer B, Rottwinkel Y (2004) Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:318–324PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Baka ZM, Basciftci FA, Arslan U (2013) Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:260–267PubMedCrossRef Baka ZM, Basciftci FA, Arslan U (2013) Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:260–267PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, McLeod J, Covell DA Jr, Maier T, ve Machida CA (2009) Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:426–427PubMedCrossRef Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, McLeod J, Covell DA Jr, Maier T, ve Machida CA (2009) Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:426–427PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pandis N, Papaioannou W, Kontou E, Nakou M, Makou M, Eliades T (2010) Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 32:94–99PubMedCrossRef Pandis N, Papaioannou W, Kontou E, Nakou M, Makou M, Eliades T (2010) Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 32:94–99PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidence of white spot lesions among patients treated with self- and conventional ligation systems
Authors
Mehmet Akin
Mucella Tezcan
Zehra Ileri
Faruk Ayhan
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1382-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2015 Go to the issue