Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2013

Open Access 01-03-2013 | Review

Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity

Authors: Christian H. Splieth, Aikaterini Tachou

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Special Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

In contrast to the well-established caries epidemiology, data on dentin hypersensitivity seem to be scarce and contradictory. This review evaluates the available literature on dentin hypersensitivity and assesses its prevalence, distribution, and potential changes.

Materials and methods

The systematic search was performed to identify and select relevant publications with several key words in electronic databases. In addition, the articles’ bibliographies were consulted.

Results

Prevalence rates range from 3 to 98 %. This vast range can be explained partly by the differences in the selection criteria for the study sample and also the variety in diagnostic approaches or time frames. Women are slightly more affected than men and an age peak of 30–40 years has been reported. Still, the prevalence of erosions with dentin exposure seems to increase in younger adults, often resulting in hypersensitivity. In older patients, root surfaces are frequently exposed due to periodontal disease which is associated with a high rate of dentin hypersensitivity, especially after periodontal treatment and intensified brushing activity. On the other hand, the number of affected seniors with tooth loss or even edentulism is reduced. About 25–30 % of the adult population report dentin hypersensitivity. Most dentists also consider it to be a relevant problem in their practice, but they request more information on this topic. Maxillary teeth are affected to a higher extent, but the different teeth show very similar rates. Buccal surfaces clearly show the highest prevalence rates.

Conclusion

In spite of the advances regarding management of dentin hypersensitivity, it still remains an epidemiologically understudied field.

Clinical relevance

Although great variations have been observed in the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity, this issue is often observed by dentists and related by patients. However, further studies are necessary to find the cause of this condition and refine its management.
Literature
1.
2.
Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R (1997) Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 24:808–813PubMedCrossRef
3.
Addy M (1990) Etiology and clinical implications of dentine hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 34:503–514PubMed
4.
Chabanski MB, Gillam DG (1997) Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 24:15–19PubMedCrossRef
5.
Goldberg M, Grootveld M, Lynch E (2010) Undesirable and adverse effects of tooth-whitening products: a review. Clin Oral Investig 14:1–10PubMedCrossRef
6.
Haywood VB (2002) Dentine hypersensitivity: bleaching and restorative considerations for successful management. Int Dent J 52:376–385
7.
Von Troil B, Needleman I, Sanz M (2002) A systematic review of the prevalence of root sensitivity following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):173–177, discussion 195–6CrossRef
8.
Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN (1996) Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department. J Clin Periodontol 23:989–992PubMedCrossRef
9.
Graham FL, Tatton-Brown C, Meert G, Alexander DC (2002) Prevalence and severity of dentine hypersensitivity: a global perspective. J Dent Res 82(special issue B):134
10.
Rong WS, Hu DY, Feng XP, Tai BJ, Zhang JC, Ruan JP (2010) A national survey on dentin hypersensitivity in Chinese urban adults. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 45:141–145PubMed
11.
Cummins D (2010) Recent advances in dentin hypersensitivity: clinically proven treatments for instant and lasting sensitivity relief. Am J Dent 23(Spec No A):3A–13APubMed
12.
Cummins D (2009) Dentin hypersensitivity: from diagnosis to a breakthrough for everyday sensitivity relief. J Clin Dent 20:1–9PubMed
13.
Rees JS, Addy M (2002) A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 29:997–1003PubMedCrossRef
14.
Rees JS, Addy M (2004) A cross-sectional study of buccal cervical sensitivity in UK general dental practice and a summary review of prevalence studies. Int J Dent Hyg 2:64–69PubMedCrossRef
15.
Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Eijkman MA, Newman HN (2002) Dentists' perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity and knowledge of its treatment. J Oral Rehabil 29:219–225PubMedCrossRef
16.
Orchardson R, Gilliam D (2006) Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 137:990–998PubMed
17.
Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity (2003) Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 69:222–226
18.
Amarasena N, Spencer J, Ou Y, Brennan D (2011) Dentine hypersensitivity in a private practice patient population in Australia. J Oral Rehabil 38:52–60PubMedCrossRef
19.
Bekes K, Schaller H-G, Hirsch C (2008) Verbesserung mundgesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität durch die Anwendung von Mundhygieneprodukten für schmerzempfindliche Zähne und freiliegende Zahnhälse. ZWR 117:75–80CrossRef
20.
Oyama T, Matsumoto K (1991) A clinical and morphological study of cervical hypersensitivity. J Endod 17:500–502PubMedCrossRef
21.
Flynn J, Galloway R, Orchardson R (1985) The incidence of hypersensitive teeth in the west of Scotland. J Dent 13:230–236PubMedCrossRef
22.
Fischer C, Fischer RG, Wennberg A (1992) Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dent 20:272–276PubMedCrossRef
23.
Graf H, Galasse R (1977) Morbidity, prevalence and intraoral distribution of hypersensitive teeth. J Dent Res 56(special issue a):162
24.
Dababneh R, Khouri A, Addy M (1999) Dentine hypersensitivity: an enigma? A review of terminology, epidemiology, mechanisms, aetiology and management. Br Dent J 187:606–611PubMed
25.
Addy M, Pearce N (1994) Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Archs Oral Biol 39:33–38CrossRef
26.
Addy M (2006) Tooth brushing, tooth wear and dentine hypersensitivity—are they associated? J Ir Dent Assoc 51:226–231PubMed
27.
Bamise CT, Olusile AO, Oginni AO (2008) An analysis of etiological and predisposing factors related to dentin hypersensitivity. J Contemp Dent Pract 1(9):52–59
28.
Bamise CT, Kolawole KA, Oloyede EO, Esan TA (2010) Tooth sensitivity experience among residential university students. Int J Dent Hyg 8:95–100PubMedCrossRef
29.
Ommerborn MA, Schneider C, Giraki M, Schafer R, Singh P, Franz M, Raab WH (2007) In vivo evaluation of noncarious cervical lesions in sleep bruxism subjects. J Prosthet Dent 98:150–158PubMedCrossRef
30.
Splieth C, Schwahn C, Bernhardt O, John U (2004) Prevalence and distribution of root caries in Pomerania, North-East Germany. Caries Res 38:333–340PubMedCrossRef
31.
Gillam DG, Aris A, Bulman JS, Newman HN, Ley F (2002) Dentine hypersensitivity in subjects recruited for clinical trials: clinical evaluation, prevalence and intra-oral distribution. J Oral Rehabil 29:226–231PubMedCrossRef
32.
Amarasena N, Spencer J, Ou Y, Brennan D (2010) Dentine hypersensitivity—Australian dentists' perspective. Aust Dent J 55:181–187PubMedCrossRef
33.
Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HNJ (1997) Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study. Oral Rehabil 24:666–672CrossRef
34.
Rees JS, Jin U, Lam S, Kudanowska I, Vowles R (2003) The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent 31:453–461PubMedCrossRef
35.
Micheelis W, Bauch J (1996) Oral health of representative samples of Germans examined in 1989 and 1992. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 24:62–67PubMedCrossRef
36.
Dünninger P, Uhl T, Einwag J, Naujoks R (1995) Die Veränderungen der Mundgesundheit in der Bundesrebublik Deutschland-das Projekt A10. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 50:40–44
37.
Gillam DG, Seo HS, Newman HN, Bulman JS (2001) Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations. J Oral Rehabil 28:20–25PubMedCrossRef
38.
Sakalauskienė Z, Vehkalahti MM, Murtomaa H, Mačiulskienė V (2011) Factors related to gender differences in toothbrushing among Lithuanian middle-aged university employees. Medicina (Kaunas) 47:180–186
39.
Westenhoefer J (2005) Age and gender dependent profile of food choice. In: Elmadfa I (ed) Diet diversification and health promotion Forum Nutr. Karger, Basel, pp 44–51CrossRef
40.
Nuttall NM, Bradnock G, White D, Morris J, Nunn J (2001) Adult Dental Health Survey: dental attendance in 1998 and implications for the future. BDJ 190:177–182PubMed
41.
Noone JH, Stephens C (2008) Men, masculine identities, and health care utilisatiion. Sociol Health Illn 30:711–725PubMedCrossRef
42.
Al-Sabbagh M, Beneduce C, Andreana S, Ciancio SG (2010) Incidence and time course of dentinal hypersensitivity after periodontal surgery. Gen Dent 58:e14–e19PubMed
43.
Rees JS (2000) The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol 27:860–865PubMedCrossRef
44.
Walters PA (2005) Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2(6):107–117
45.
Lewis DW, Ismail AI (1995) The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination 1995 update: 2. Prevention of dental caries. Can Med Assoc J 152(6)
46.
Swift EJ Jr, Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr (2008) 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations. Am J Dent 21(3):148–152PubMed
47.
Jorgensen MG, Carroll WB (2002) Incidence of tooth sensitivity after home whitening treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 133:1076–1082PubMed
48.
Taani Q, Awartani F (2002) Clinical evaluation of cervical dentin sensitivity (CDS) inpatients attending general dental clinics (GDC) and periodontal specialty clinics (PSC). J Clin Periodontol 29:118–122PubMedCrossRef
49.
Irwin CR, McCusker P (1997) Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental population. J Irish Dent Assoc 43:7–9
50.
Suri P, Rainville J, Fitzmaurice GM, Katz JN, Jamison RN, Martha J, Hartigan C, Limke J, Jouve C, Hunter DJ (2011) Acute low back pain is marked by variability: an internet-based pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 5(12):220CrossRef
51.
Pradeep AR, Sharma A (2010) Comparison of clinical efficacy of a dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate to a dentifrice containing potassium nitrate and to a placebo on dentinal hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 81:1167–1173PubMedCrossRef
52.
Du Min Q, Bian Z, Jiang H, Greenspan DC, Burwell AK, Zhong J, Tai BJ (2008) Clinical evaluation of a dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate (novamin) for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 21:210–214PubMed
53.
Ghassemi A, Hooper W, Winston AE, Sowinski J, Bowman J, Sharma N (2009) Effectiveness of a baking soda toothpaste delivering calcium and phosphate in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity. J Clin Dent 20:203–210PubMed
54.
Bernhardt O, Gesch D, Schwahn C, Mack F, Meyer G, John U, Kocher T (2006) Epidemiological evaluation of the multifactorial aetiology of abfractions. J Oral Rehabil 33:17–25PubMedCrossRef
55.
Jaeggi T, Schaffner M, Bürgin W, Lussi A (1999) Erosions and wedge-shaped defects in Swiss Army recruits. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 109:1170–1182PubMed
Metadata
Title
Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity
Authors
Christian H. Splieth
Aikaterini Tachou
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue Special Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0889-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2013

Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2013 Go to the issue

Original Article

Exposed cervical dentin and dentin hypersensitivity summary of the discussion and recommendations

Review

A decision tree for the management of exposed cervical dentin (ECD) and dentin hypersensitivity (DHS)

Review

How to make a link between Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and dentin hypersensitivity in the dental office?

Review

Current management of dentin hypersensitivity

Review

What is known about the influence of dentine hypersensitivity on oral health-related quality of life?

Review

How valid and applicable are current diagnostic criteria and assessment methods for dentin hypersensitivity? An overview