Top

Clinical Oral Investigations

Published in:

01-04-2013 | Original Article

Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites

Authors: M. Victoria Fuentes, Laura Ceballos, Santiago González-López

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2013

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to determine microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of three self-adhesive and a total-etch resin cements used for luting different treated indirect composites.

Materials and methods

Composite overlays (Filtek Z250) were prepared. Their intaglio surfaces were ground with 600-grit SiC papers and randomly assigned to three different surface treatments: no treatment, silane application (RelyX Ceramic Primer), and silane agent followed by a bonding agent (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT). The composite overlays were luted to flat dentin surfaces of extracted human third molars using the following self-adhesive resin cements: RelyX Unicem, Maxcem Elite and G-Cem, and a total-etch resin cement, RelyX ARC. The bonded assemblies were stored in water (24 h, 37 °C) and subsequently prepared for μTBS testing. Beams of approximately 1 mm² were tested in tension at 1 mm/min in a universal tester (Instron 3345). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls tests (α = 0.05).

Results

A significant influence of the resin cement used was detected. Composite surface treatment and the interaction between the resin cement applied and surface treatment did not affect μTBS.

Conclusions

Surface treatment of indirect resin composite did not improve the μTBS results of dentin/composite overlay complex. Self-adhesive resin cements tested obtained lower μTBS than the total-etch resin cement RelyX ARC. Specimens luted with Maxcem Elite exhibited the highest percentage of pretesting failures.

Clinical relevance

Surface treatment of indirect resin composite with silane or silane followed by a bonding agent did not affect bond strength to dentin.

Stewart PG, Jain P, Hodges J (2002) Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 88:277–284PubMedCrossRef

Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2000) The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J Dent 28:447–452PubMedCrossRef

D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L (2007) Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 9:319–326PubMed

Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Burke FJ, Marquis PM (2003) Effects of grit blasting and silanization on bond strengths of a resin luting cement to Belleglass HP indirect composite. Am J Dent 16:53–57PubMed

Hori S, Minami H, Minesaki Y, Matsumura H, Tanaka T (2008) Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching on shear bond strength of an indirect resin composite to an adhesive cement. Dent Mater J 27:515–522PubMedCrossRef

Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM (1989) Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 5:417–424PubMedCrossRef

Nilsson E, Alaeddin S, Karlsson S, Milleding P, Wennerberg A (2000) Factors affecting the shear bond strength of bonded composite inlays. Int J Prosthodont 13:52–58PubMed

El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ (2003) Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 19:575–583PubMedCrossRef

Souza EM, Francischone CE, Powers JM, Rached RN, Vieira S (2008) Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of indirect composites. Am J Dent 21:93–96PubMed

10.

Duarte S, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A (2008) Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent 100:203–210PubMedCrossRef

11.

Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M (2008) Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 10:251–258PubMed

12.

Sarr M, Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Kane AW, Vreven J, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL (2010) Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin. Clin Oral Invest 14:569–577CrossRef

13.

Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M (2008) Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 87:974–979PubMedCrossRef

14.

Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Casucci A, Toledano M, Ferrari M (2008) Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 24:1156–1163PubMedCrossRef

15.

Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT (2009) Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 25:1104–1108PubMedCrossRef

16.

Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2005) Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Invest 9:161–167CrossRef

17.

Behr M, Hansmann M, Rosentritt M, Handel G (2009) Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent. Clin Oral Invest 13:459–464CrossRef

18.

Blatz MB, Phark JH, Ozer F, Mante FK, Saleh N, Bergler M, Sadan A (2010) In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Invest 14:187–192CrossRef

19.

Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lückel H, Frankenberger R (2011) Self-adhesive cements as core build-ups for one-stage post-endodontic restorations? Int Endod J 44:195–202PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sailer I, Oendra AE, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CH (2012) The effects of desensitizing resin, resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond strength of dentin luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 107:252–260PubMedCrossRef

21.

Behr M, Rosentritt M, Wimmer J, Lang R, Kolbeck C, Bürgers R, Handel G (2009) Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical trial begun 2003. Dent Mater 25:601–604PubMedCrossRef

22.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent 12:151–161PubMed

23.

Schenke F, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Moder D, Schmalz G (2012) Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years. Clin Oral Invest 16:451–461CrossRef

24.

Taschner M, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Pelka M, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2012) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. Dent Mater 28:535–540PubMedCrossRef

25.

Cantoro A, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Coniglio I, Ferrari M (2009) Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays. J Dent 37:454–461PubMedCrossRef

26.

Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA (2008) Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 36:969–976PubMedCrossRef

27.

Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M (2001) Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 85:184–189PubMedCrossRef

28.

Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Ritter AV, Swift EJ (2005) Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent 7:159–164PubMed

29.

Papacchini F, Radovic I, Magni E, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Chieffi N, Polimeni A, Ferrari M (2008) Flowable composites as intermediate agents without adhesive application in resin composite repair. Am J Dent 21:53–58PubMed

30.

Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA (1992) Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 8:193–196PubMedCrossRef

31.

Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC, Boyer DB (1994) Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent 7:200–202PubMed

32.

Tam LE, McComb D (1991) Shear bond strengths of resin luting cements to laboratory-made composite resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 66:314–321PubMedCrossRef

33.

Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R (1997) Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77:122–126PubMedCrossRef

34.

Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A (2009) Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 25:442–451PubMedCrossRef

35.

Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, Tay FR (2009) Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of luting resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 25:58–66PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, Tay FR (2009) Effect of 2 % chlorhexidine on dentin microtensile bond strengths and nanoleakage of luting cements. J Dent 37:440–448PubMedCrossRef

37.

Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF (2009) Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 102:306–312PubMedCrossRef

38.

Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schläpfer R, Hämmerle C, Fischer J (2008) Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 24:944–950PubMedCrossRef

39.

Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC (2007) Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater 23:211–217PubMedCrossRef

40.

Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2006) Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 8:327–335PubMed

41.

Ilie N, Simon A (2012) Effect of curing mode on the micro-mechanical properties of dual-cured self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Invest 16:505–512CrossRef

42.

Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G (2004) Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 20:463–469PubMedCrossRef

43.

Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M (2008) Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 24:185–191PubMedCrossRef

44.

Belli R, Pelka M, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2009) In vitro wear gap formation of self-adhesive resin cements: a CLSM evaluation. J Dent 37:984–993PubMedCrossRef

45.

Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M (2006) Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 22:45–56PubMedCrossRef

46.

Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G (2007) Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 23:829–839PubMedCrossRef

47.

De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971PubMedCrossRef

48.

Cantoro A, Goracci C, Coniglio I, Magni E, Polimeni A, Ferrari M (2011) Influence of ultrasound application on inlays luting with self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Invest 15:617–623CrossRef

49.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458PubMedCrossRef

50.

Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2002) Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 18:609–621PubMedCrossRef

51.

Giráldez I, Ceballos L, Garrido MA, Rodríguez J (2011) Early hardness of self-adhesive resin cements cured under indirect resin composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 23:116–124PubMedCrossRef

52.

Saskalauskaite E, Tam LE, McComb D (2008) Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements. J Prosthodont 17:262–268PubMedCrossRef

53.

Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T (2007) Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J 26:906–914PubMedCrossRef

Title: Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites
Authors: M. Victoria Fuentes
Laura Ceballos
Santiago González-López
Publication date: 01-04-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0752-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Six months of high-dose xylitol in high-risk caries subjects—a 2-year randomised, clinical trial

Histological evaluation of bone healing using organic bovine bone in combination with platelet-rich plasma (an experimental study on rabbits)

Relationship between oral health, diabetes management and sleep apnea

Characterisation of bone following ultrasonic cutting

Comparison of biogenerically reconstructed and waxed-up complete occlusal surfaces with respect to the original tooth morphology

Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months