Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Article

Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions—results at 3 years

Authors: Michael F. Burrow, Martin J. Tyas

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of S3 Bond (Kuraray Corp., Japan) and G-Bond (GC Corp., Japan) all-in-one bonding agents, over 3 years in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Ethics Committee approval was obtained, and 60 restorations were placed in 11 patients aged 45–84 years (mean 60.5 years), using either Clearfil ST resin composite (Kuraray) and S3 Bond or Gradia resin composite (GC) and G-Bond alternately, without phosphoric acid etch on the uncut enamel margins. Patients were recalled at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, and photographs were taken for assessment of colour match and marginal discoloration. One patient was not available at 3 years, resulting in 54 restorations being available for evaluation. One restoration of S3/Clearfil ST was lost at 2 years, giving retention rates of 97% for S3 and 100% for G-Bond. At 3 years, six restorations for S3/Clearfil ST showed slight marginal discoloration and one restoration pronounced marginal staining. For G-Bond/Gradia at 3 years, 11 restorations exhibited slight marginal staining and one restoration pronounced marginal staining. Most restorations were bonded to sclerotic dentin. Statistical analysis of marginal staining showed no significant difference between the two restoration groups. The degree of marginal staining was almost identical for both materials and tended to be in larger restorations. Both S3 and G-Bond all-in-one bonding systems appear to be good adhesives for the restoration of NCCL for the length of the current study. Restoration of NCCLs with the newer all-in-one adhesives appears to be a viable alternative technique to more complicated adhesive materials.
Literature
1.
Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S (2004) The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 31:117–123PubMedCrossRef
2.
Michael JA, Kaidonis JA, Townsend GC (2010) Non-carious cervical lesions on permanent anterior teeth: a new morphological classification. Aust Dent J 55:134–137PubMedCrossRef
3.
Grenness MJ, Tyas MJ, Osborn JE (2009) Mapping a non-carious cervical lesion using stereoimagery and dental casts incorporating optical texture. J Dent 37:191–197PubMedCrossRef
4.
Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci 51:323–332PubMedCrossRef
5.
Veira AH, Santaigo SL (2009) Management of dentinal hypersensivity. Gen Dent 57:120–126
6.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 24:864–881CrossRef
7.
Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 11:175–190PubMed
8.
Scholtanus JD, Purwanta K, Dogan N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ (2010) Microtensile bond strength of three simplified adhesives systems to caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 12:273–278PubMed
9.
Xie C, Han Y, Zhao XY, Wang ZY, He HM (2010) Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling. Oper Dent 35:547–555PubMedCrossRef
10.
Burrow MF, Kitasako Y, Thomas CD, Tagami J (2008) Comparison of enamel and dentine microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming systems and five all-in-one systems. Oper Dent 33:456–460PubMedCrossRef
11.
Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis RB, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2008) A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1-year. J Dent 36:847–855PubMedCrossRef
12.
Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estrada BE, Brackett WW (2010) Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and ClearfilS3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions. Oper Dent 35:273–278PubMedCrossRef
13.
Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2010) Three-year clinical evaluation of flowable and hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 38:191–200PubMedCrossRef
14.
Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2008) A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year. Aust Dent J 53:235–238PubMedCrossRef
15.
van Dijken JW (2010) A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 26:940–946PubMedCrossRef
16.
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2009) Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 37:149–155PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ermis RB, Van Landuyt KL, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M (2011) Clinical effectiveness of a one-step adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 2 years. Clin Oral Invest May 21, epub
19.
Brdna P, Vrbova R, Dudek M, Roubickova A, Housova D (2008) Comparison of bonding performance of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives on human dentin using reliability analysis. J Adhes Dent 10:423–429
20.
Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Endo K, Ohno H (2009) In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds with one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 117:611–617PubMedCrossRef
21.
Abdalla AI (2010) Effect of long-term water aging on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 23:29–33PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions—results at 3 years
Authors
Michael F. Burrow
Martin J. Tyas
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0595-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2012 Go to the issue

Original Article

Periodontal inflamed surface area and C-reactive protein as predictors of HbA1c: a study in Indonesia

Original Article

Dental functional status with and without tooth replacement in a Chinese adult population

Original Article

A phase IIa randomized controlled pilot study evaluating the safety and clinical outcomes following the use of rhGDF-5/β-TCP in regenerative periodontal therapy

Original Article

A longitudinal three-center study of craniofacial morphology at 6 and 12 years of age in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate

Original Article

Isolating stromal stem cells from periodontal granulation tissues

Original Article

In situ remineralization of white-spot enamel lesions by 500 and 1,100 ppm F dentifrices