Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions

Authors: Marleen Peumans, Jan De Munck, Kirsten L. Van Landuyt, Andre Poitevin, Paul Lambrechts, Bart Van Meerbeek

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This 13-year randomized clinical trial compared the clinical effectiveness of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in combination with a hybrid, stiffer composite versus a micro-filled, more flexible composite. The influence of composite stiffness on the clinical performance of one of the adhesives was assessed as well. One hundred and forty-two non-carious cervical lesions were restored with composites with contrasting stiffness. Seventy-one patients randomly received two cervical restorations placed following two out of three adhesive procedures: (1) the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Permaquick applied with the stiff micro-hybrid composite Amelogen Hybrid (PMQ-H, Ultradent), (2) Permaquick applied with the more flexible micro-filled Amelogen Microfill (PMQ-M, Ultradent), or (3) the “gold-standard” three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Optibond FL applied with the micro-hybrid composite Prodigy (OFL-P, Kerr). The restorations were evaluated after 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 13 years of clinical service regarding their retention, marginal integrity and discoloration, caries occurrence, preservation of tooth vitality, and post-operative sensitivity. Retention loss, severe marginal defects, and/or discoloration that needed intervention (repair or replacement) and the occurrence of caries were considered as clinical failures. The recall rate at 13 years was 77%. Bond degradation after 13 years was mainly characterized by a further increase in the presence of small but clinically acceptable marginal defects and superficial marginal discoloration. Twelve percent of the OFL-P restorations were clinically unacceptable. In the PMQ group, 22% of the PMQ-M restorations and 26% of the PMQ-H restorations needed repair or replacement. Regarding the clinical failure rate, Optibond FL scored significantly better than Permaquick (McNemar; p = 0.015). No statistically significant differences were found between the micro-filled and the hybrid composite for each of the parameters evaluated (McNemar, p > 0.05). After 13 years of clinical functioning, the clinical effectiveness of the three adhesive/composite combinations remained highly acceptable.
Literature
1.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture: adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235PubMed
2.
Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Tay F (2005) Characterisation of resin–dentine interfaces by compressive cyclic loading. Biomaterials 26:2043–2052PubMedCrossRef
3.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132PubMedCrossRef
4.
Blunck U, Zaslansky (2007) Effectiveness of all-in-one adhesive systems tested by thermo-cycling following short and long-term water storage. J Adhes Dent 9:231–240PubMed
5.
Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 11:175–190PubMed
6.
Hashimoto M (2010) A review—micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin–dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 92B:268–280CrossRef
7.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, De Munck J (2010) Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 26:100–121CrossRef
8.
Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V (2010) Clinical performance of cervical restorations—a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 26:993–100
9.
Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Ito S (2004) Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 83:216–221PubMedCrossRef
10.
Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, Tay F (2005) Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res 84:741–746. Erratum in: J Dent Res 2006; 85:384
11.
De Munck J, Van den Steen PE, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Opdenakker G, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of adhesive–dentin interfaces. J Dent Res 12:1101–1106
12.
Nishiyama N, Suzuki K, Komatsu K, Yasuda S, Nemoto K (2002) A 13C NMR study on the adsorption characteristics of HEMA to dentinal collagen. J Dent Res 81:469–471PubMedCrossRef
13.
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayami Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki Y, De Munck J, Van Meebeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458PubMedCrossRef
14.
Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Nagakane K, Suzuki K, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 84:1160–1164PubMedCrossRef
15.
Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M (2004) A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent 29:376–385PubMed
16.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater 23:749–754PubMedCrossRef
17.
Boghosian AA, Drummond JL, Lautenschlager E (2007) Clinical evaluation of a dentin adhesive system: 13 year results. J Dent Res 86 (Spec Issue A): abstract 228
18.
van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg LA (2007) Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 23:1101–1117PubMedCrossRef
19.
van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2008) Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24:915–922PubMedCrossRef
20.
Wilder AD, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC (2009) A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 140:526–535PubMed
21.
Vanherle G, Verschueren M, Lambrechts P, Braem M (1986) Clinical investigation of dental adhesive systems. Part I: an in vivo study. J Prosthet Dent 55:157–163PubMedCrossRef
22.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98—FDI World Dental Federation. Study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent 9:121–147PubMed
23.
Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y (2007) 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent 32:3–10PubMedCrossRef
24.
Ritter AV, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD (2009) An eight-year clinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 140:28–37PubMed
25.
Ichim I, Li Q, Loughran J, Swain MV, Kieser J (2007) Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Part I. Modelling of restorative fracture. Dent Mater 23:1553–1561PubMedCrossRef
26.
Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV (2007) Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture. Dent Mater 23:1562–1569PubMedCrossRef
27.
De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Four year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 82:136–139PubMedCrossRef
28.
Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Yamauti M, Pashley DH, Tay F (2007) Durability of resin–dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 23:885–892PubMedCrossRef
29.
Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ (2008) Four-year water degradation of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent 36:611–617PubMedCrossRef
30.
Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M (2008) Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 10:339–344PubMed
31.
Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 21:110–124PubMedCrossRef
32.
De Munck J, Shirai K, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to Class I cavity dentin. Oper Dent 31:456–465PubMedCrossRef
33.
Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Mine A, Cardoso MV, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Self-etch bonding jeopardized by smear and filler debonding. J Dent Res 89:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
34.
Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2008) Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a HEMA/TEGDMA-free three-step etch&rinse adhesive. J Dent 36:767–773PubMedCrossRef
35.
Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G (1986) The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res 65:648–653PubMedCrossRef
36.
Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO (2000) Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Oper Dent 25:46–50PubMed
37.
Tyas MJ, Burrow MF (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 15:309–311PubMed
38.
Çelik Ç, Özgünaltay G, Attar N (2003) Clinical evaluation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 82:136–140CrossRef
39.
Turner EW, Shook LW, Ross JA, deRijk W, Eason BC (2008) Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite in non-carious class V lesions: two-year results. J Tennessee Dent Assoc 88:20–24
40.
Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2010) Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 38:191–200PubMedCrossRef
41.
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64:658–664PubMedCrossRef
42.
Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1993) Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin–dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434–1442PubMedCrossRef
43.
Bartlett DW, Shah P (2006) A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion and abrasion. J Dent Res 85:306–312PubMedCrossRef
44.
Rees JS, Hammadeh M (2004) Undermining of enamel as a mechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 112:347–352PubMedCrossRef
45.
Rees JS, Jacobsen PH (1998) The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study. J Dent 26:361–367PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions
Authors
Marleen Peumans
Jan De Munck
Kirsten L. Van Landuyt
Andre Poitevin
Paul Lambrechts
Bart Van Meerbeek
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0481-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2012 Go to the issue

Short Communication

In vivo assessment of DNA damage induced in oral mucosa cells by fixed and removable metal prosthodontic appliances

Original Article

A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry

Original Article

Case series: non vascular considerations in trigeminal neuralgia

Original Article

Counting touching cell nuclei using fast ellipse detection to assess in vitro cell characteristics: a feasibility study

Original Article

Test–retest reliability of MRI-based disk position diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint

Original Article

Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements