Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Article

Spatial relation between a rigid (digital) intraoral X-ray receptor and longitudinal axes of maxillary teeth

Authors: Felix Roeder, Isabell von Rechenberg, Bernd d’Hoedt, Ralf Schulze

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the existing (inevitable) angle which in intraoral radiology appears between tooth length axis and receptor caused by the anatomical situation. Especially in the upper jaw, due to its arched anatomy, a true “paralleling technique” is not achievable. The angulation necessarily causes distortion and a foreshortening of the image; hence, the foreshortened image leads to misinterpretations in diagnostics. We investigated the effects of the realistic angulation on these image deteriorating factors. Two hundred ninety-four plaster models of the upper jaw were collected, and the angles between a dummy receptor and the axes of the central incisor or the first molar were measured. For evaluation, a rigid dummy of an intraoral charge-coupled device (CCD) receptor (30 mm × 40 mm) was used. The mean angulation evaluated for central incisors was 36.7° (range 19–56°) and for first molars 42.5° (range 26–56°). This leads to a foreshortening of the tooth ranging from 5.4% to 44.1% in the image, when magnification is neglected. Large angles of up to 56°, in both incisor and molar region, result in a relevant underestimation of true tooth length up to 44%. It is important to note that this error cannot be simply corrected by means of local magnification correction. Techniques should be developed that allow for automated assessment of the effective angle to provide information for distortion correction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van Aken J (1969) Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg 27:475–491CrossRef Van Aken J (1969) Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg 27:475–491CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371PubMedCrossRef Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schulze R, d'Hoedt B (2002) A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in “paralleling technique”. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:32–38PubMedCrossRef Schulze R, d'Hoedt B (2002) A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in “paralleling technique”. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:32–38PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roeder F, Brüllmann D, d'Hoedt B, Schulze R (2010) Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM). Clin Oral Invest (in press) Roeder F, Brüllmann D, d'Hoedt B, Schulze R (2010) Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM). Clin Oral Invest (in press)
5.
go back to reference Eickholz P, Hausmann E (2000) Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 108:70–73PubMedCrossRef Eickholz P, Hausmann E (2000) Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 108:70–73PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim TS, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149PubMedCrossRef Kim TS, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzal A (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Investig 13:375–381PubMedCrossRef Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzal A (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Investig 13:375–381PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637PubMedCrossRef Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172PubMedCrossRef BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32:624–627PubMedCrossRef Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32:624–627PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Behneke N, Tetsch P (1985) Diagnostik und Planung von Implantaten im zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Fortsch Zahnärztl Implantol 1:266–271 Behneke N, Tetsch P (1985) Diagnostik und Planung von Implantaten im zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Fortsch Zahnärztl Implantol 1:266–271
12.
go back to reference Benn DK (1990) A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J Clin Periodontol 17:14–21PubMedCrossRef Benn DK (1990) A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J Clin Periodontol 17:14–21PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dubrez B, Jacot-Dsecombes S, Cimasoni G (1995) Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:358–364PubMedCrossRef Dubrez B, Jacot-Dsecombes S, Cimasoni G (1995) Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:358–364PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed
15.
go back to reference Dixon CA, Hildebolt CF (2005) An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:67–73PubMedCrossRef Dixon CA, Hildebolt CF (2005) An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:67–73PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wu JC, Huang JN, Zhao SF, Xu XJ, Zhang JC, Xia B, Dong YF (2005) Use of a simple intraoral instrument to standardize film alignment and improve image reproducibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100:99–104PubMedCrossRef Wu JC, Huang JN, Zhao SF, Xu XJ, Zhang JC, Xia B, Dong YF (2005) Use of a simple intraoral instrument to standardize film alignment and improve image reproducibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100:99–104PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schulze R, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d'Hoedt B (2004) Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys 31:2849–2854PubMedCrossRef Schulze R, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d'Hoedt B (2004) Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys 31:2849–2854PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schulze RKW (2010) Pose determination of a cylindrical (dental) implant in three-dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:33–41PubMedCrossRef Schulze RKW (2010) Pose determination of a cylindrical (dental) implant in three-dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:33–41PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schulze R, Roeder F (2009) Device, bite element and system for intraoral radiography. Patent application: DE102 00 901 7905.4, applicant: Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz Schulze R, Roeder F (2009) Device, bite element and system for intraoral radiography. Patent application: DE102 00 901 7905.4, applicant: Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz
20.
go back to reference Mühlreiter E, de Jonge TE (1928) Anatomie des menschlichen Gebisses, 5th edn. Felix Verlag, Leipzig, pp 25–43 Mühlreiter E, de Jonge TE (1928) Anatomie des menschlichen Gebisses, 5th edn. Felix Verlag, Leipzig, pp 25–43
21.
go back to reference Jenkins SM, Dummer PM, Newcombe RG (1995) Radiographic amelocemental junction and alveolar crest: effect of x-ray beam angulation. J Oral Rehabil 22:679–684PubMedCrossRef Jenkins SM, Dummer PM, Newcombe RG (1995) Radiographic amelocemental junction and alveolar crest: effect of x-ray beam angulation. J Oral Rehabil 22:679–684PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Santos-Pinto L, Cordeiro Rde C, Zuanon AC, Basso MD, Gonçalves MA (2007) Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study. Pediatr Dent 29:470–474PubMed Santos-Pinto L, Cordeiro Rde C, Zuanon AC, Basso MD, Gonçalves MA (2007) Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study. Pediatr Dent 29:470–474PubMed
23.
go back to reference Krithika AC, Kandaswamy D, Velmurugan N, Krishna VG (2008) Non-metallic grid for radiographic measurement. Aust Endod J 34:36–38PubMedCrossRef Krithika AC, Kandaswamy D, Velmurugan N, Krishna VG (2008) Non-metallic grid for radiographic measurement. Aust Endod J 34:36–38PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Spatial relation between a rigid (digital) intraoral X-ray receptor and longitudinal axes of maxillary teeth
Authors
Felix Roeder
Isabell von Rechenberg
Bernd d’Hoedt
Ralf Schulze
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0430-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2011 Go to the issue