Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Oral Investigations

01-03-2006 | Review

State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Orofacial diagnostic imaging has grown dramatically in recent years. As the use of endosseous implants has revolutionized oral rehabilitation, a specialized technique has become available for the preoperative planning of oral implant placement: cone beam computed tomography (CT). This imaging technology provides 3D and cross-sectional views of the jaws. It is obvious that this hardware is not in the same class as CT machines in cost, size, weight, complexity, and radiation dose. It is thus considered to be the examination of choice when making a risk–benefit assessment. The present review deals with imaging modalities available for preoperative planning purposes with a specific focus on the use of the cone beam CT and software for planning of oral implant surgery. It is apparent that cone beam CT is the medium of the future, thus, many changes will be performed to improve these. Any adaptation of the future systems should go hand in hand with a further dose optimalization.
Literature
1.
Arai Y, Honda K, Iwai K, Shinoda K (2001) Practical model “3DX” of limited cone-beam X-ray CT for dental use. Int Congr Ser 1230:713–718CrossRef
2.
Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R, Okano T, Seo K (2004) Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:51–59PubMedCrossRef
3.
Baba R, Konno Y, Ueda K, Ikeda S (2002) Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 26:153–158PubMedCrossRef
4.
Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M (2004) Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:285–290PubMedCrossRef
5.
Belser U, Schmit B, Higginbottom F, Buser D (2004) Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: A review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:30–42 (Suppl)PubMed
6.
Besimo C, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS (2000) Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:46-51PubMedCrossRef
7.
Brånemark P-I, Breine U, Adell R, Hanson Bo, Lindström J, Ohlsson A (1969) Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 3:81–100PubMedCrossRef
8.
Brooks SL, Beason R, Sarment D, Sukovic P (2004) Implant imaging with the I-CAT cone-beam CT-a progress report. Int Congr Ser 1268:1184–1186CrossRef
9.
Cavalcanti MGP, Rocha SS, Vannier MW (2004) Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:170–176PubMedCrossRef
10.
Fortin T, Coudert J, Champleboux G, Sautot P, Lavallee S (1995) Computer-assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. J Image Guid Surg 1:53–58PubMedCrossRef
11.
Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Bogaerts R, Sanderink G (2005) Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part 1: patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:145–149PubMedCrossRef
12.
Harris D, Buser D, Dula K et al (2002) E.A.O Guidelines for the use of Diagnostic Imaging in Implant Dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 566–570
13.
Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M (2003) A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:371–377PubMedCrossRef
14.
Heiland M, Schmelzle R, Hebecker A, Schulze D (2004) Intraoperative 3D imaging of the facial skeleton using the SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:130–132PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hirsch E, Graf H-L, Hemprich A (2003) Comparative investigation of image quality of three different X-ray procedures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32:201–211CrossRef
16.
Honda K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Hasimoto K, Saito T, Shinoda K (2000) Fundamental efficiency of new-style limited cone-beam CT (3DX). Comparison with Helical CT. Jpn J Tomogr 27:17–22
17.
Honda K, Larheim A, Johannessen S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Westesson P (2001) Ortho cubic super high resolution computed tomography: a new radiographic technique with application to the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91:239–243PubMed
18.
Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K (2001) Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:539–542PubMedCrossRef
19.
Iwai K, Arai Y, Nishizawa K,Tammisalo E, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K (1998) Estimation of radiation doses from ortho cubic super high resolution CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27[Suppl 1]:39
20.
Jacobs R, Gijbels F (2000) Oral Imaging 2000. KULeuven, Dept Periodontology, Leuven, pp 4–8
21.
Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D (1999) Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28:105–111PubMedCrossRef
22.
Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A (2004) Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:228–231PubMed
23.
Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM (2004) Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:291–294PubMedCrossRef
24.
Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T (1996) A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:329–336PubMedCrossRef
25.
Loubele M, Schutyser K, Debaveye D, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Maes F, van Cleynenbreugel J, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P (2005) Radiation dose versus image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and dental implant planning. Radiat Prot Dosim (International workshop on optimisation of dose and performance in interventional and digital imaging-DIMOND III, March 25–27, 2004, Leuven, Belgium) (in press)
26.
Ludlow JB, Brooks SL, Davies-Ludlow LE, Howerton WB (2005) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT units for oral and maxillofacial radiology. 15th International Congress of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. OP22, p 53
27.
Mishima A, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto A, Kimura Y, Tanaka M (2001) Comparison of patient radiation dose from dental CT and spiral CT. Symposium of high technology research center in Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine. Nagasue Shoten, Yokohama, Japan, pp 171–172
28.
Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA (1998) A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 8:1558–1564PubMedCrossRef
29.
Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Mishima, Ishii H, Asada K, Ishibashi K (2002) Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment toll before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:322–327PubMedCrossRef
30.
Naitoh M, Arjji E, Okumura S, Ohsaki C, Kurita K, Ishigama T (2000) Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Oral Implants Res 11:409–414PubMedCrossRef
31.
Oldham M, Letourneau D, Watt L, Chen P, Martinez A, Wong J (2003) On-line volumetric CT-guided radiation theraphy. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys 57:184 (Suppl)
32.
Pouliot J, Xia P, Aubin M, Verhey L, Bani-Hashemi A, Ghelmansarai F, Mitschke M, Svatos M (2003) Low-dose megavoltage cone beam CT for dose-guided radiation therapy. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys 57:183 (Suppl)
33.
Sarkar PS, Sinha A, Kashyap Y, More MR, Godwal BK (2004) Development and characterization of a 3D cone beam tomography system. Nucl Instr Meth A 524:377–384CrossRef
34.
Sarment D, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N (2003) Accuracy of implant placement with astereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:571–577PubMed
35.
Schulze D, Heiland M, Schmelzle R, Rother UJ (2004) Diagnostic possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography in the facial skeleton. Int Congr Ser 1268:1179–1183CrossRef
36.
Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G (2004b) Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:83–86PubMedCrossRef
37.
Shinoda K, Honda K, Matsumoto K, Arai Y (2004) Annual report of limited cone beam computed tomography (3D Accu-I-Tomo) from 3000 cases at Nihon University dental hospital in 2003. Int Congr Ser 1268:1187–1191CrossRef
38.
Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Chafetz N, Rhodes M (1989) Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am 33:555–597PubMed
39.
Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637PubMedCrossRef
40.
van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P (2002) A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:663–670PubMed
41.
van Steenberghe D, Ericsson I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Schutyser F, Brajnovic I, Andersson M (2004) High precision planning for oral implants based on 3-D CT scanning. A new surgical technique for immediate and delayed loading. Appl Osseointegration Res 4:27–31
42.
Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, Schopper C, Patruta S, Kainberger K, Figl M, Kettenbach J, Bergmann H, Ewers R (2002) Evaluation of accuracy of computer aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:59–64PubMedCrossRef
43.
Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, Wagner A, Enislidis G, Millesi W, Baumann A, Ewers R (1997) Computer-aided navigation in secondary reconstruction of post-traumatic deformities of the zygoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 25:198–202PubMed
44.
Wiegert J, Bertram M, Wulff J, Schafer D, Weese J, Netsch T, Schomberg H, Rose G (2004) 3D ROI imaging for cone-beam computed tomography. Int Congr Ser 1268:7–12CrossRef
45.
Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S (2002) Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:126–130PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement
Publication date
01-03-2006
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0031-2