Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Women's Mental Health 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Letter to the Editor

Reassessing the clinical utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 for depression screening in prenatal women: a commentary on Sidebottom et al.

Authors: Stephanie Coronado-Montoya, Linda Kwakkenbos, Brooke Levis, Brett D. Thombs

Published in: Archives of Women's Mental Health | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Sidebottom et al. (2012) evaluated the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to identify pregnant women with depression. They studied 745 women from three community health centers who completed the PHQ-9 and were assessed for depressive disorders with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The prevalence of current major depressive disorder (MDD) was 3.6 % (n = 27). A PHQ-9 cutoff score of ≥10 was 85 % sensitive and 84 % specific for identifying women with MDD. The positive predictive value (PPV), which is the percent of women with positive depression screens who had MDD, was 17 %, which increased to 43 % if women with three or more symptoms of depression, but who did not meet criteria for MDD, were additionally counted as cases. Sidebottom et al. concluded that the PHQ-9 would be useful for screening to identify pregnant women with MDD. Implementation of this recommendation would be certain to consume substantial resources, but may not result in improved mental health for pregnant women. …
Literature
go back to reference Thombs BD, Arthurs E, El-Baalbaki G, Meijier A, Ziegelstein RC, Steele RJ (2011) Risk of bias from inclusion of patients who already have diagnosis of or are undergoing treatment for depression in diagnostic accuracy studies of screening tools for depression: systematic review. Br Med J 343:d4825. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4825 CrossRef Thombs BD, Arthurs E, El-Baalbaki G, Meijier A, Ziegelstein RC, Steele RJ (2011) Risk of bias from inclusion of patients who already have diagnosis of or are undergoing treatment for depression in diagnostic accuracy studies of screening tools for depression: systematic review. Br Med J 343:d4825. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​d4825 CrossRef
go back to reference Thombs BD, Coyne JC, Cuijpers P, de Jonge P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis JPA, Johnson BT, Patten SB, Turner EH, Ziegelstein RC (2012) Rethinking recommendations for depression screening in primary care. Can Med Assoc J 184:413–418. doi:10.1503/cmaj.111035n CrossRef Thombs BD, Coyne JC, Cuijpers P, de Jonge P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis JPA, Johnson BT, Patten SB, Turner EH, Ziegelstein RC (2012) Rethinking recommendations for depression screening in primary care. Can Med Assoc J 184:413–418. doi:10.​1503/​cmaj.​111035n CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reassessing the clinical utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 for depression screening in prenatal women: a commentary on Sidebottom et al.
Authors
Stephanie Coronado-Montoya
Linda Kwakkenbos
Brooke Levis
Brett D. Thombs
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1434-1816
Electronic ISSN: 1435-1102
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-013-0340-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Archives of Women's Mental Health 3/2013 Go to the issue