Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Hydrocephalus | Original Article - CSF Circulation

Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?

Authors: Stefanie Kaestner, Manuela Poetschke, Uwe Kehler, Sebastian Antes, Matthias Krause, Wolfgang Deinsberger

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients.

Methods

In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data.

Results

Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery.

Conclusion

Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barton SE, Campbell JW, Piatt JH Jr (2013) Quality measures for the management of hydrocephalus: concepts, simulations, and preliminary field-testing. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:392–397CrossRef Barton SE, Campbell JW, Piatt JH Jr (2013) Quality measures for the management of hydrocephalus: concepts, simulations, and preliminary field-testing. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:392–397CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beez T, Steiger HJ (2018) Comparison of quality metrics for pediatric shunt surgery and proposal of the negative shunt revision rate. World Neurosurg 109:e404–e408CrossRef Beez T, Steiger HJ (2018) Comparison of quality metrics for pediatric shunt surgery and proposal of the negative shunt revision rate. World Neurosurg 109:e404–e408CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dave P, Venable GT, Jones TL, Khan NR, Albert GW, Chern JJ, Wheelus JL, Governale LS, Huntoon KM, Maher CO, Bruzek AK, Mangano FT, Mehta V, Beaudoin W, Naftel RP, Basem J, Whitney A, Shimony N, Rodriguez LF, Vaughn BN, Klimo P (2019) The preventable shunt revision rate: a multicenter evaluation. Neurosurgery. 84(3):788–798CrossRef Dave P, Venable GT, Jones TL, Khan NR, Albert GW, Chern JJ, Wheelus JL, Governale LS, Huntoon KM, Maher CO, Bruzek AK, Mangano FT, Mehta V, Beaudoin W, Naftel RP, Basem J, Whitney A, Shimony N, Rodriguez LF, Vaughn BN, Klimo P (2019) The preventable shunt revision rate: a multicenter evaluation. Neurosurgery. 84(3):788–798CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dupepe EB, Hopson B, Johnston JM, Rozzelle CJ, Jerry Oakes W, Blount JP, Rocque BG (2016) Rate of shunt revision as a function of age in patients with shunted hydrocephalus due to myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 41(5):E6CrossRef Dupepe EB, Hopson B, Johnston JM, Rozzelle CJ, Jerry Oakes W, Blount JP, Rocque BG (2016) Rate of shunt revision as a function of age in patients with shunted hydrocephalus due to myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 41(5):E6CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Iglesias S, Ros B, Martín Á, Carrasco A, Segura M, Ros A, Rius F, Arráez MÁ (2017) Factors related to shunt survival in paediatric hydrocephalus. Could failure be avoided? Neurocirugia (Astur) 28(4):159–166CrossRef Iglesias S, Ros B, Martín Á, Carrasco A, Segura M, Ros A, Rius F, Arráez MÁ (2017) Factors related to shunt survival in paediatric hydrocephalus. Could failure be avoided? Neurocirugia (Astur) 28(4):159–166CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kaestner S, Kruschat T, Nitzsche N, Deinberger W (2009) Gravitational units may cause underdrainage in bedridden patients. Acta Neurochir 151:217–221CrossRef Kaestner S, Kruschat T, Nitzsche N, Deinberger W (2009) Gravitational units may cause underdrainage in bedridden patients. Acta Neurochir 151:217–221CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R, Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J, Haines S, Schiff S, Cochrane D, Steinbok P, MacNeil N (2000) Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg 33(5):230–236CrossRef Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R, Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J, Haines S, Schiff S, Cochrane D, Steinbok P, MacNeil N (2000) Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg 33(5):230–236CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lund-Johanson M, Svendsen F, Wester K (1994) Shunt failures and complications in adults as related to shunt type, diagnosis, and the experience of the surgeon. Neurosurgery 35:839–844CrossRef Lund-Johanson M, Svendsen F, Wester K (1994) Shunt failures and complications in adults as related to shunt type, diagnosis, and the experience of the surgeon. Neurosurgery 35:839–844CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Piatt JH Jr (2014) Thirty-day outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery: data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14:179–183CrossRef Piatt JH Jr (2014) Thirty-day outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery: data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14:179–183CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Preuss M, Kutscher A, Wachowiak R, Merkenschlager A, Bernhard MK, Reiss-Zimmermann M, Meixensberger J, Nestler U (2015) Adult long-term outcome of patients after congenital hydrocephalus shunt therapy. Childs Nerv Syst 31:49–56CrossRef Preuss M, Kutscher A, Wachowiak R, Merkenschlager A, Bernhard MK, Reiss-Zimmermann M, Meixensberger J, Nestler U (2015) Adult long-term outcome of patients after congenital hydrocephalus shunt therapy. Childs Nerv Syst 31:49–56CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reddy GK, Bollam P, Caldito G (2014) Long-term outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 81(2):404–410CrossRef Reddy GK, Bollam P, Caldito G (2014) Long-term outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 81(2):404–410CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Riva-Cambrin J, Kestle JR, Holubkov R, Butler J, Kulkarni AV, Drake J, Whitehead WE, Wellons JC 3rd, Shannon CN, Tamber MS, Limbrick DD Jr, Rozzelle C, Browd SR, Simon TD, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (2016) Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 7(4):382–390CrossRef Riva-Cambrin J, Kestle JR, Holubkov R, Butler J, Kulkarni AV, Drake J, Whitehead WE, Wellons JC 3rd, Shannon CN, Tamber MS, Limbrick DD Jr, Rozzelle C, Browd SR, Simon TD, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (2016) Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 7(4):382–390CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shah SS, Hall M, Slonim AD, Hornig GW, Berry JG, Sharma V (2008) A multicenter study of factors influencing cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival in infants and children. Neurosurgery. 62(5):1095–1102 discussion 1102-3CrossRef Shah SS, Hall M, Slonim AD, Hornig GW, Berry JG, Sharma V (2008) A multicenter study of factors influencing cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival in infants and children. Neurosurgery. 62(5):1095–1102 discussion 1102-3CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stone JJ, Walker CT, Jacobson M, Phillips V, Silberstein HJ (2013) Revision rate of pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunts after 15 years. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11(1):15–19CrossRef Stone JJ, Walker CT, Jacobson M, Phillips V, Silberstein HJ (2013) Revision rate of pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunts after 15 years. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11(1):15–19CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tejedor-Sojo J, Singleton LM, McCormick K, Wrubel D, Chern J (2015) Preventability of pediatric 30-day readmissions following ventricular shunt surgery. J Pediatr 167:1327–1333CrossRef Tejedor-Sojo J, Singleton LM, McCormick K, Wrubel D, Chern J (2015) Preventability of pediatric 30-day readmissions following ventricular shunt surgery. J Pediatr 167:1327–1333CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tuli S, Drake J, Lawless J, Wigg M, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2000) Risk factors for repeated cerebrospinal shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 92(1):31–38CrossRef Tuli S, Drake J, Lawless J, Wigg M, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2000) Risk factors for repeated cerebrospinal shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 92(1):31–38CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Venable GT, Rossi NB, Morgan Jones G, Khan NR, Smalley ZS, Roberts ML, Klimo P Jr (2016) The preventable shunt revision rate: a potential quality metric for pediatric shunt surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 18(1):7–15CrossRef Venable GT, Rossi NB, Morgan Jones G, Khan NR, Smalley ZS, Roberts ML, Klimo P Jr (2016) The preventable shunt revision rate: a potential quality metric for pediatric shunt surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 18(1):7–15CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?
Authors
Stefanie Kaestner
Manuela Poetschke
Uwe Kehler
Sebastian Antes
Matthias Krause
Wolfgang Deinsberger
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Acta Neurochirurgica 1/2020 Go to the issue