Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Editorial (by Invitation)

Innovation in neurosurgery

Author: Mario Ammirati

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

The paper by Muskens et al. [1] endeavors to evaluate two innovative neurosurgical procedures, the endonasal approach to skull base meningiomas (EEMS) and the WovenEndobridge (WEB device) for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, according to the IDEAL recommendations.The IDEAL recommendations are an evolving set of guidelines on how to introduce innovations in surgery and, if widely accepted, may represent a quantum leap improvement in the way surgical innovations are introduced. This is sorely needed to improve patient safety and resource allocations. The IDEAL contribution rests, in addition and concurrently to the structured process it outlines, on ethical approval and informed consent. This diad, together with independent outcome evaluation, tries to place some constraints on potential freewheeling behavior. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Muskens IS, Diederen SJH, Senders JT, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, van Furth WR, May AM, Smith TR, Bredenoord AL, Broekman MLD (2017) Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review. Acta Neurochir. doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3280-3 Muskens IS, Diederen SJH, Senders JT, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, van Furth WR, May AM, Smith TR, Bredenoord AL, Broekman MLD (2017) Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review. Acta Neurochir. doi:10.​1007/​s00701-017-3280-3
Metadata
Title
Innovation in neurosurgery
Author
Mario Ammirati
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3283-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Acta Neurochirurgica 10/2017 Go to the issue