Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Technical Note - Neurosurgical Techniques

Optional real-time display of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in the microscopic field of view: avoiding communication failures in the operating room

Authors: Veit M. Stoecklein, Florian Faber, Mandy Koch, Rudi Mattmüller, Anika Schaper, Frank Rudolph, Joerg C. Tonn, Christian Schichor

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery has improved patient safety and outcomes. However, a pitfall in the use of IONM remains unsolved. Currently, there is no feasible way for surgeons to interpret IONM waves themselves during operations. Instead, they have to rely on verbal feedback from a neurophysiologist. This method is prone to communication failures, which can lead to delayed or false interpretation of the data. Direct visualization of IONM waves is a way to alleviate this problem and make IONM more effective.

Methods

Microscope-integrated IONM (MI-IONM) was used in 163 cranial and spinal cases. We evaluated the feasibility, system stability and how well the system integrated into the surgical workflow. We used an IONM system that was connected to a surgical microscope. All IONM modalities used at our institution could be visualized as required, superimposed on the surgical field in the eyepiece of the microscope without obstructing the surgeon’s field of vision.

Results

Use of MI-IONM was safe and reliable. It furthermore provided valuable intraoperative information. The system merely required a short learning curve. Only minor system problems without impact on surgical workflow occurred. MI-IONM proved to be especially useful in surgical cases where careful monitoring of nerve function is required, e.g., cerebellopontine angle surgery. Here, direct assessment of surgical action and IONM wave change was provided to the surgeon, if necessary (on-off control).

Conclusion

MI-IONM is a useful extension of conventional IONM that provides optional real-time functional information to the surgeon on demand.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Acioly MA, Liebsch M, de Aguiar PH, Tatagiba M (2013) Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction. World Neurosurg 80:e271–e300CrossRefPubMed Acioly MA, Liebsch M, de Aguiar PH, Tatagiba M (2013) Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction. World Neurosurg 80:e271–e300CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine 35:S37–S46CrossRefPubMed Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine 35:S37–S46CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guo L, Gelb AW (2011) The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia. Clin Neurophysiol 122:648–655CrossRefPubMed Guo L, Gelb AW (2011) The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia. Clin Neurophysiol 122:648–655CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nagpal K, Vats A, Ahmed K, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2010) An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study. Ann Surg 252:402–407CrossRefPubMed Nagpal K, Vats A, Ahmed K, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2010) An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study. Ann Surg 252:402–407CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, Ritchie R, Jones R, Bush M, Shinn JB (2013) Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:933–938CrossRefPubMed Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, Ritchie R, Jones R, Bush M, Shinn JB (2013) Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:933–938CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kircher ML, Kartush JM (2012) Pitfalls in intraoperative nerve monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurg Focus 33:E5CrossRefPubMed Kircher ML, Kartush JM (2012) Pitfalls in intraoperative nerve monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurg Focus 33:E5CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nuwer MR, Cohen BH, Shepard KM (2013) Practice patterns for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Neurology 80:1156–1160CrossRefPubMed Nuwer MR, Cohen BH, Shepard KM (2013) Practice patterns for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Neurology 80:1156–1160CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Prell J, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Rampp S (2010) A real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 66:1064–1073, discussion 1073 CrossRefPubMed Prell J, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Rampp S (2010) A real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 66:1064–1073, discussion 1073 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Optional real-time display of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in the microscopic field of view: avoiding communication failures in the operating room
Authors
Veit M. Stoecklein
Florian Faber
Mandy Koch
Rudi Mattmüller
Anika Schaper
Frank Rudolph
Joerg C. Tonn
Christian Schichor
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2518-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2015 Go to the issue