Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 7/2011

01-07-2011 | Experimental research

Lumbosacral intrathecal nerve roots: an anatomical study

Authors: Mehmet Arslan, Ayhan Cömert, Halil İbrahim Açar, Mevci Özdemir, Alaittin Elhan, İbrahim Tekdemir, Shane R. Tubbs, Ayhan Attar, Hasan Çağlar Uğur

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The lumbosacral intrathecal anatomy is complex because of the density of nerve roots in the cauda equina. Space-occupying lesions, including disc herniation, trauma and tumor, within the spinal canal may compromise the nerve roots, causing severe clinical syndromes. The goal of this study is to provide spinal surgeons with a detailed anatomical description of the intrathecal nerve roots and to emphasize their clinical importance.

Method

Ten formalin-fixed male cadavers were studied. They were dissected with the aid of a surgical microscope, and measurements were performed.

Results

The number of dorsal and ventral roots ranged from one to three. The average diameter of roots increased from L1 to S1 (0.80 mm for L1 and 4.16 for S1), respectively. Then their diameter decreased from S1 to S5 (4.16 mm for S1, 0.46 mm for S5). The largest diameter was found at S1 and the smallest at S5. The average number of rootlets per nerve root increased from L1 to S1, then decreased (3.25 for L1, 12.6 for S1, and 1.2 for S5), respectively. The greatest rootlet number was seen at S1, and the fewest were observed at S5. The average diameter of the lateral recess gradually decreased from L1 to L4 (9.1 mm for L1; 5.96 mm for L4) and then increased at L5 level (6.06 mm); however, the diameter of the nerve root increased from L1 to L5. The midpoint of distance between the superior and inferior edge of the intradural exit nerve root was 3.47 mm below the inferior edge of the superior articular process at the L1 level, while the origin of the L5 exit root was 5.75 mm above the inferior edge. The root origin gradually ascended from L1 to L5.

Conclusions

The findings of this study may be valuable for understanding lesions compressing intradural nerve roots and may be useful for intradural spinal procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Artico M, Carloia S, Piacentini M, Ferretti G, Dazzi M, Franchitto S, Bronzetti E (2006) Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: Observations on three cases and review of the literature. Neurocirugia (Astur) 17:54–59 Artico M, Carloia S, Piacentini M, Ferretti G, Dazzi M, Franchitto S, Bronzetti E (2006) Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: Observations on three cases and review of the literature. Neurocirugia (Astur) 17:54–59
2.
3.
go back to reference Ciric I, Mikhael MA, Tarkington JA, Vick NA (1980) The lateral recess syndrome. A variant of spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 53:433–443PubMedCrossRef Ciric I, Mikhael MA, Tarkington JA, Vick NA (1980) The lateral recess syndrome. A variant of spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 53:433–443PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cohen MS, Wall EJ, Kerber CW, Abithol JJ, Garfin SR (1991) The anatomy of the cauda equina on CT scans and MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B:381–384 Cohen MS, Wall EJ, Kerber CW, Abithol JJ, Garfin SR (1991) The anatomy of the cauda equina on CT scans and MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B:381–384
5.
go back to reference D’Avella D, Mingrino S (1979) Microsurgical anatomy of lumbosacral spinal roots. J Neurosurg 51:819–823PubMedCrossRef D’Avella D, Mingrino S (1979) Microsurgical anatomy of lumbosacral spinal roots. J Neurosurg 51:819–823PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hauck EF, Wittkowski W, Bothe HW (2008) Intradural microanatomy of the nerve roots S1—S5 at their origin from the conus medullaris. J Neurosurg Spine 9:207–212PubMedCrossRef Hauck EF, Wittkowski W, Bothe HW (2008) Intradural microanatomy of the nerve roots S1—S5 at their origin from the conus medullaris. J Neurosurg Spine 9:207–212PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Kadish LJ, Simmons EH (1984) Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots: An anatomical investigation and myelographic study. J Bone Joint Surg 66-B:411–416 Kadish LJ, Simmons EH (1984) Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots: An anatomical investigation and myelographic study. J Bone Joint Surg 66-B:411–416
10.
go back to reference Karataş A, Çağlar Ş, Savaş A, Elhan A, Erdoğan A (2005) Microsurgical anatomy of the dorsal cervical rootlets and dorsal root entry zones. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:195–199CrossRef Karataş A, Çağlar Ş, Savaş A, Elhan A, Erdoğan A (2005) Microsurgical anatomy of the dorsal cervical rootlets and dorsal root entry zones. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:195–199CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kitab SA, Miele VJ, Lavelle WF, Benzel EC (2009) Pathoanatomic basis for stretch-induced lumbar nerve root injury with a review of the literature. Neurosurgery 65:161–168PubMedCrossRef Kitab SA, Miele VJ, Lavelle WF, Benzel EC (2009) Pathoanatomic basis for stretch-induced lumbar nerve root injury with a review of the literature. Neurosurgery 65:161–168PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lang J, Geisel U (1983) Lumbosacral part of the dural sac and the topography of its contents. Morphol Med 31:27–46 Lang J, Geisel U (1983) Lumbosacral part of the dural sac and the topography of its contents. Morphol Med 31:27–46
13.
go back to reference Monajati A, Wayne WS, Rausching W, Ekholm SE (1987) MRI of the cauda equina. AJNR 8:893–900PubMed Monajati A, Wayne WS, Rausching W, Ekholm SE (1987) MRI of the cauda equina. AJNR 8:893–900PubMed
14.
go back to reference Moriishi J, Otanı K, Tanaka K, Inoue SI (1989) The intersegmental anastomoses between the spinal nerve roots. Anat Rec 224:110–116PubMedCrossRef Moriishi J, Otanı K, Tanaka K, Inoue SI (1989) The intersegmental anastomoses between the spinal nerve roots. Anat Rec 224:110–116PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Naidich TP, King DG, Moran CJ, Sagel SS (1980) Computed tomography of the lumbar thecal sac. J Comput Asist Tomogr 4:37–41CrossRef Naidich TP, King DG, Moran CJ, Sagel SS (1980) Computed tomography of the lumbar thecal sac. J Comput Asist Tomogr 4:37–41CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, Kummer FJ, Neuwirth MD (1996) An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine 21:1133–1139PubMedCrossRef Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, Kummer FJ, Neuwirth MD (1996) An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine 21:1133–1139PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Phillips LH, Park TS (1993) The frequency of intradural conjoined lumbosacral dorsal nerve roots found during selective dorsal rhizotomy. Neurosurgery 33:88–91PubMedCrossRef Phillips LH, Park TS (1993) The frequency of intradural conjoined lumbosacral dorsal nerve roots found during selective dorsal rhizotomy. Neurosurgery 33:88–91PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schalow G (1985) The problem of cauda equina nerve root identification. Zentralbl Neurochir 46:322–330PubMed Schalow G (1985) The problem of cauda equina nerve root identification. Zentralbl Neurochir 46:322–330PubMed
19.
go back to reference Strojnic T (2001) Measurement of the lateral recess angle as a possible alternative for evaluation of the lateral recess stenosis on a CT scan. Wien Klin Wochenschr 113:53–58 Strojnic T (2001) Measurement of the lateral recess angle as a possible alternative for evaluation of the lateral recess stenosis on a CT scan. Wien Klin Wochenschr 113:53–58
20.
go back to reference Tong HC, Carson JT, Haig AJ, Quint DJ, Phalke VR, Yamakawa KSJ, Miner JA (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic older adults. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 19:67–72 Tong HC, Carson JT, Haig AJ, Quint DJ, Phalke VR, Yamakawa KSJ, Miner JA (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic older adults. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 19:67–72
21.
go back to reference Turner RP (2009) Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Clin Neurophysiol 26(2):82–84PubMedCrossRef Turner RP (2009) Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Clin Neurophysiol 26(2):82–84PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ulmer JL, Elster AD, Mathews WP, King JC (1994) Distinction between degenerative and ishmic spondylolisthesis on sagittal MRI images: Importance of increased anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal “ wide canal sign”. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:411–416PubMed Ulmer JL, Elster AD, Mathews WP, King JC (1994) Distinction between degenerative and ishmic spondylolisthesis on sagittal MRI images: Importance of increased anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal “ wide canal sign”. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:411–416PubMed
23.
go back to reference Wall EJ, Massie JB, Kwan MK, Rydevik BL, Myers RR, Garfin SR (1992) Experimental stretch neuropathy. Changes in nerve conduction under tension. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74B:126–129 Wall EJ, Massie JB, Kwan MK, Rydevik BL, Myers RR, Garfin SR (1992) Experimental stretch neuropathy. Changes in nerve conduction under tension. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74B:126–129
24.
go back to reference Wall EJ, Cohen MS, Massie JB, Rydevik B, Garfin SR (1990) Cauda equina anatomy I: Intrathecal nerve root organization. Spine 15:1244–1247PubMedCrossRef Wall EJ, Cohen MS, Massie JB, Rydevik B, Garfin SR (1990) Cauda equina anatomy I: Intrathecal nerve root organization. Spine 15:1244–1247PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wall EJ, Cohen MS, Abithol JJ, Garfin SR (1990) Organization of intrathecal nerve roots at the level of conus medullaris. J Bone Joint Surg 72:1495–1499PubMed Wall EJ, Cohen MS, Abithol JJ, Garfin SR (1990) Organization of intrathecal nerve roots at the level of conus medullaris. J Bone Joint Surg 72:1495–1499PubMed
26.
go back to reference Warf BC, Nelson KR (1996) The electromyographic responses to dorsal rootlet stimulation during partial dorsal rhizotomy are inconsistent. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:13–19PubMedCrossRef Warf BC, Nelson KR (1996) The electromyographic responses to dorsal rootlet stimulation during partial dorsal rhizotomy are inconsistent. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:13–19PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Weishaupt D, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Boos N, Romanowski B, Kissling RO, Dvorak J, Hodler J (2000) Positional MRI imaging of the lumbar spine: Does it demonstrate nerve poor compromise not visible at conventional MRI imaging? Radiology 215:247–253PubMed Weishaupt D, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Boos N, Romanowski B, Kissling RO, Dvorak J, Hodler J (2000) Positional MRI imaging of the lumbar spine: Does it demonstrate nerve poor compromise not visible at conventional MRI imaging? Radiology 215:247–253PubMed
28.
go back to reference Wilmink JT (1989) CT morphology of intrathecal lumbosacral nerve-root compression. AJNR 10:233–248PubMed Wilmink JT (1989) CT morphology of intrathecal lumbosacral nerve-root compression. AJNR 10:233–248PubMed
Metadata
Title
Lumbosacral intrathecal nerve roots: an anatomical study
Authors
Mehmet Arslan
Ayhan Cömert
Halil İbrahim Açar
Mevci Özdemir
Alaittin Elhan
İbrahim Tekdemir
Shane R. Tubbs
Ayhan Attar
Hasan Çağlar Uğur
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-0952-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

Acta Neurochirurgica 7/2011 Go to the issue