Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 4/2017

01-04-2017 | How To Do It

The intentional oblique transection double stapling technique in anterior resection for rectal cancer

Authors: Masafumi Kuramoto, Satoshi Ikeshima, Kenichiro Yamamoto, Keisuke Morita, Tomoyuki Uchihara, Rumi Itouyama, Shinichi Yoshimatsu, Shinya Shimada, Hideo Baba

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The double stapling technique (DST) is an intestinal reconstruction technique that has been widely adopted in anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer. However, anastomotic leakage (AL) after the operation remains a major concern for colorectal surgeons. The sharp-angled corner of the remnant rectum that is often created by the ordinary DST can be a risk factor for AL. We have developed a new method of performing intentional oblique transection DST (IOT-DST). Using this technique, the anal side of the rectum is intentionally obliquely transected with linear staplers, and the area of the sharp-angled edge is totally punched out with a circular stapler. Between September 2015 and March 2016, we used the IOT-DST technique in the treatment of 15 consecutive rectal cancer patients and experienced no anastomosis-related complications, including leakage and stenosis. IOT-DST is easy to use and less stressful to perform than other techniques. IOT-DST has the potential to become the standard technique for AR in rectal cancer surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jestin P, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Colporectal Dis. 2008;10:715–21.CrossRef Jestin P, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Colporectal Dis. 2008;10:715–21.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Karanjiia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1224–6.CrossRef Karanjiia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1224–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85:355–8.CrossRefPubMed Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85:355–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan W. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92–6.CrossRefPubMed Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan W. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211–6.CrossRefPubMed Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2988–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2988–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021–6.CrossRefPubMed Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference den Dulk M, Marijinen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Pahlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1066–75.CrossRef den Dulk M, Marijinen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Pahlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1066–75.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253:890–9.CrossRefPubMed Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253:890–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemiitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.CrossRefPubMed Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemiitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The intentional oblique transection double stapling technique in anterior resection for rectal cancer
Authors
Masafumi Kuramoto
Satoshi Ikeshima
Kenichiro Yamamoto
Keisuke Morita
Tomoyuki Uchihara
Rumi Itouyama
Shinichi Yoshimatsu
Shinya Shimada
Hideo Baba
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1382-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Surgery Today 4/2017 Go to the issue