Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 12/2015

01-12-2015 | How to Do It

Dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using the intended stoma site as the multichannel port

Authors: Takahisa Ishikawa, Shigenori Homma, Susumu Shibasaki, Tadashi Yoshida, Nozomi Minagawa, Hideki Kawamura, Norihiko Takahashi, Akinobu Taketomi

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

We describe a novel minimally invasive procedure: dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using a SILS™ port, and report our experience of using this to treat ten patients with lower rectal cancer. A SILS™ port was placed in the left lower quadrant at the intended colostomy site. A 5-mm trocar was inserted at the umbilicus at the subsequent drain site. Via a standard laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach, the inferior mesenteric artery and vein were ligated and total mesorectal excision was performed. Via a perineal approach, the specimen was retrieved from the perineal wound, and a sigmoid colostomy was created at the site of the SILS™ port. Ten consecutive patients with lower rectal cancer at clinical stage T3 or lower underwent the procedure at our institution. The procedure was completed successfully in all patients, without any intraoperative problems and all postoperative outcomes were satisfactory. Thus, dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection can be performed safely and feasibly in selected patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Bracale U, Nastro P, Bramante S, Pignata G. Single incision laparoscopic anterior resection for cancer using a “QuadiPort access system”. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2010;57:105–9.CrossRefPubMed Bracale U, Nastro P, Bramante S, Pignata G. Single incision laparoscopic anterior resection for cancer using a “QuadiPort access system”. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2010;57:105–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bulut O, Aslak KK, Rosenstock S. Technique and short-term outcomes of single-port surgery for rectal cancer: a feasibility study of 25 patients. Scand J Surg. 2014;103:26–33.CrossRefPubMed Bulut O, Aslak KK, Rosenstock S. Technique and short-term outcomes of single-port surgery for rectal cancer: a feasibility study of 25 patients. Scand J Surg. 2014;103:26–33.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lauritsen ML, Bulut O. Single-port access laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection through the colostomy site: a case report. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:175–7.CrossRefPubMed Lauritsen ML, Bulut O. Single-port access laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection through the colostomy site: a case report. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:175–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hua-Feng P, Zhi-Wei J, Gang W, Xin-Xin L, Feng-Tao L. A novel approach for the resection of low rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:537–41.CrossRefPubMed Hua-Feng P, Zhi-Wei J, Gang W, Xin-Xin L, Feng-Tao L. A novel approach for the resection of low rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:537–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stewart DB, Messaris E. Adequate margins for anorectal cancer can be achieved by single-site laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:316–22.CrossRefPubMed Stewart DB, Messaris E. Adequate margins for anorectal cancer can be achieved by single-site laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:316–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lopez NE, Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy SL, McLemore EC, Sedrak MF, Lowy AM, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through an ostomy site: a natural approach by an unnatural orifice. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25:74–8.CrossRefPubMed Lopez NE, Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy SL, McLemore EC, Sedrak MF, Lowy AM, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through an ostomy site: a natural approach by an unnatural orifice. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25:74–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kawamata F, Homma S, Minagawa N, Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Taketomi A. Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38:2716–23.CrossRefPubMed Kawamata F, Homma S, Minagawa N, Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Taketomi A. Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38:2716–23.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M. Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:18–23.CrossRefPubMed Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M. Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:18–23.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mike M, Kano N. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a review of the fascial composition of the abdominal cavity. Surg Today. 2015;45:129–39.CrossRefPubMed Mike M, Kano N. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a review of the fascial composition of the abdominal cavity. Surg Today. 2015;45:129–39.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Inada R, Yamamoto S, Oshiro T, Takawa M, Fujita S, Akasu T. A case-matched comparison of the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:640–5.CrossRefPubMed Inada R, Yamamoto S, Oshiro T, Takawa M, Fujita S, Akasu T. A case-matched comparison of the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:640–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Johansson H, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, et al. Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg. 2005;92:225–9.CrossRefPubMed Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Johansson H, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, et al. Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg. 2005;92:225–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986;2:996–9.CrossRefPubMed Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986;2:996–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, Tekkis PP. The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1723–9.CrossRefPubMed Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, Tekkis PP. The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1723–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using the intended stoma site as the multichannel port
Authors
Takahisa Ishikawa
Shigenori Homma
Susumu Shibasaki
Tadashi Yoshida
Nozomi Minagawa
Hideki Kawamura
Norihiko Takahashi
Akinobu Taketomi
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1224-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Surgery Today 12/2015 Go to the issue