Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Article

Rating and issues of mechanical anastomotic staplers in surgical practice: a survey of 241 Japanese gastroenterological surgeons

Authors: Emiko Kono, Yasuko Tomizawa, Tomoko Matsuo, Sachiyo Nomura

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Commercially available mechanical devices for gastrointestinal anastomosis are mostly made in overseas. Japanese female surgeons have described these devices as being too large and difficult to handle. This study investigated the degree of satisfaction and problems experienced by Japanese surgeons in using various staplers for mechanical anastomosis.

Methods

A questionnaire was prepared and sent via email to 5,537 members of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery. The questionnaire included sex, age, surgical glove size, degree of satisfaction with various mechanical staplers, stress felt when using the staplers in anastomosis, and problems regarding the devices.

Results

Valid responses were received from 241 respondents (167 males, 74 females, response rate 4.9 %). The satisfaction rate ranged from 0 to 100 %. The average glove size in males was significantly larger than that in females (median: 7.0 versus 6.0; P < 0.0001). Surgeons with glove size 6.0 or smaller felt stress more frequently than those with size 6.5 or larger (median: 40 vs. 20 %; P < 0.0001). Surgeons with glove size 6.0 and smaller experienced more difficulties during firing and releasing.

Conclusion

The satisfaction rates with currently available mechanical staplers were low. Japanese surgeons with small hands felt more stress when using the staplers. Ergonometric consideration is necessary in stapler design.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mine M, Yamamoto T. Design of a mechanical anastomosis machine for esophagus, stomach, and intestines. In: The 37th Annual meeting of Japanese Society of Medical Instrumentation; 1962:377 (in Japanese). Mine M, Yamamoto T. Design of a mechanical anastomosis machine for esophagus, stomach, and intestines. In: The 37th Annual meeting of Japanese Society of Medical Instrumentation; 1962:377 (in Japanese).
2.
go back to reference Mine M, Yamamoto T. Display of a mechanical anastomosis machine for esophagus, stomach, and intestines. Nihon Geka gakkai Zasshi 1965;66(2):112–113 (in Japanese). Mine M, Yamamoto T. Display of a mechanical anastomosis machine for esophagus, stomach, and intestines. Nihon Geka gakkai Zasshi 1965;66(2):112–113 (in Japanese).
3.
go back to reference Tokuda H. Breakthrough of mechanical anastomosis for digestive organ in Japan. Operation 1997;51(6):815–821 (in Japanese). Tokuda H. Breakthrough of mechanical anastomosis for digestive organ in Japan. Operation 1997;51(6):815–821 (in Japanese).
4.
go back to reference Androsov PI. Experience in the application of the instrumental mechanical suture in surgery of the stomach and rectum. Acta Chir Scand. 1970;136(1):57–63.PubMed Androsov PI. Experience in the application of the instrumental mechanical suture in surgery of the stomach and rectum. Acta Chir Scand. 1970;136(1):57–63.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ikenaga M, Mishima H, Yasui M, Miyazaki M, Tsujinaka T. Surgical technique: mechanical anastomosis in rectal cancer aiming at safe and reliable procedures. Operation. 2008;62(1):81–86 (in Japanese). Ikenaga M, Mishima H, Yasui M, Miyazaki M, Tsujinaka T. Surgical technique: mechanical anastomosis in rectal cancer aiming at safe and reliable procedures. Operation. 2008;62(1):81–86 (in Japanese).
6.
go back to reference Bamba Y, Itabashi M, Kamio T, Kirita T, Kameoka S. Reliable circular anastomosis with a circular stapler for female surgeons. J Tokyo Wom Med Univ 2010;80(8):234–238 (in Japanese). Bamba Y, Itabashi M, Kamio T, Kirita T, Kameoka S. Reliable circular anastomosis with a circular stapler for female surgeons. J Tokyo Wom Med Univ 2010;80(8):234–238 (in Japanese).
7.
go back to reference Berguer R, Hreljac A. The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):508–12.CrossRefPubMed Berguer R, Hreljac A. The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):508–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tomizawa Y, Kawase K, Yorozuya K, Nagata Y, Teramoto T. Current status of support for female doctors in the specialist medical societies of the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences: results of a questionnaire survey. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2009;110(3):154–61.PubMed Tomizawa Y, Kawase K, Yorozuya K, Nagata Y, Teramoto T. Current status of support for female doctors in the specialist medical societies of the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences: results of a questionnaire survey. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2009;110(3):154–61.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Troppmann KM, Palis BE, Goodnight Jr JE, Ho HS, Troppmann C. Women surgeons in the new millennium. Arch Surg. 2009;144(7):635–41.CrossRefPubMed Troppmann KM, Palis BE, Goodnight Jr JE, Ho HS, Troppmann C. Women surgeons in the new millennium. Arch Surg. 2009;144(7):635–41.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(1):151–64.CrossRefPubMed Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(1):151–64.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Burlington DB. Human factors and the FDA’s goals: improved medical device design. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1996;30(2):107–9.PubMed Burlington DB. Human factors and the FDA’s goals: improved medical device design. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1996;30(2):107–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ, Jakimowicz JJ. Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(1):201–7.CrossRefPubMed Van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ, Jakimowicz JJ. Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(1):201–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ, Kazemiere G. Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):699–703.CrossRefPubMed Van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ, Kazemiere G. Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):699–703.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(8):1231–41.CrossRefPubMed Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(8):1231–41.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mizushima I, Kasai R, Muto T, Matsuo T, Tomizawa Y, Takeda S. Ergonomic research on surgical instruments I: analysis of dynamic characteristics of mechanical anastomotic devices. In: Symposium of Medical and Biological Engineering 2011 Nagano; 2011 (in Japanese). Mizushima I, Kasai R, Muto T, Matsuo T, Tomizawa Y, Takeda S. Ergonomic research on surgical instruments I: analysis of dynamic characteristics of mechanical anastomotic devices. In: Symposium of Medical and Biological Engineering 2011 Nagano; 2011 (in Japanese).
16.
go back to reference Tokyo Metropolitan University Study Group on Physical Strength. Grip strength, In: New Standard Values of Physical Strength in Japanese. Fumaido Publishing Company, Tokyo, 2000, pp. 160–165. Tokyo Metropolitan University Study Group on Physical Strength. Grip strength, In: New Standard Values of Physical Strength in Japanese. Fumaido Publishing Company, Tokyo, 2000, pp. 160–165.
17.
go back to reference Waage A, Gagner M, Feng JJ. Early experience with computer-mediated flexible circular stapling technique for upper gastrointestinal anastomosis. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):88–94.CrossRefPubMed Waage A, Gagner M, Feng JJ. Early experience with computer-mediated flexible circular stapling technique for upper gastrointestinal anastomosis. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):88–94.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sachdeva AK, Meakins JL, Blumgart LH. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):458–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sachdeva AK, Meakins JL, Blumgart LH. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):458–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):485–94.CrossRefPubMed Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):485–94.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91(2):146–50.CrossRefPubMed Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91(2):146–50.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, Mayer JW, Felner JM, Petrusa ER, Waugh RA, Brown DD, Safford RR, Gessner IH, Gordon DL, Ewy GA. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 1999;282(9):861–6.CrossRefPubMed Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, Mayer JW, Felner JM, Petrusa ER, Waugh RA, Brown DD, Safford RR, Gessner IH, Gordon DL, Ewy GA. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 1999;282(9):861–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):291–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):291–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Rating and issues of mechanical anastomotic staplers in surgical practice: a survey of 241 Japanese gastroenterological surgeons
Authors
Emiko Kono
Yasuko Tomizawa
Tomoko Matsuo
Sachiyo Nomura
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0303-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Surgery Today 10/2012 Go to the issue