Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgery Today
Published in: Surgery Today 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Review Article

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review

Authors: Masayuki Watanabe, Yoshifumi Baba, Yohei Nagai, Hideo Baba

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer were reviewed to clarify the benefits of this surgical modality.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using synonyms for minimally invasive or thoracoscopic esophagectomy. There were 18 retrospective cohort studies and 3 meta-analyses retrieved in this review.

Results

There are several minimally invasive approaches for esophageal cancer. Total MIE using both the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach is increasingly performed. A longer operative time and less blood loss are observed with MIE in comparison to open esophagectomy (OE). Although the benefit of MIE for reducing morbidity and mortality rates is still under debate, a shorter hospital stay was common among the studies. The oncologic outcomes of MIE were not inferior to OE, while the number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater in MIE than OE in several studies.

Conclusion

Total MIE using a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach can be performed safely, although the benefits for short-term outcomes are still controversial. Oncologic outcomes are favorable and MIE may have an advantage in lymph node dissection over OE. The benefits of MIE should therefore be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
Literature
1.
Akutsu Y, Matsubara H. The significance of lymph node status as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2011;41:1190–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Morita M, Yoshida R, Ikeda K, Egashira A, Oki E, Sadanaga N, et al. Advances in esophageal cancer surgery in Japan: an analysis of 1000 consecutive patients treated at a single institute. Surgery. 2008;143:499–508.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers JC, Devitt PG. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problem in reporting its rate. Br J Surg. 2004;91:943–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
The Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. An interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Allen MS, Darling GE, Pechet TTV, Mitchell JD, Herndon JE 2nd, Landreneau RJ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of major pulmonary resections in patients with early-stage lung cancer: initial results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1013–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R CollEdinb. 1992;37:7–11.
8.
DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:1–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, Wakabayashi A. Thoracoscopic en bloc esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1533–40.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Watson DI, Davies N, Jamieson GG. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:293–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:328–32.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Kernstein KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, Van Natta TL, Campos JC, Yoder MR, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1847–9.CrossRef
13.
Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA. Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:223–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Boone J, Schipper MEI, Moojen WA, BorelRinkes IHM, Cromheecke GJE, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:878–86.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee JG, Haam SJ, Park IK, Chung KY. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:53–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:21–5.PubMed
17.
Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarahi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7–16.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2485–91.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2965–73.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Ueno M, Tanaka Y, Fukuhara K, Hashimoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita H. Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. A series of 75 cases. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1588–93.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Kawano T, Iwai T. Hand-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using a new supportive approach. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:330.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital’s first year experience. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:220–5.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:911–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Parameswaren R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868–75.CrossRef
28.
Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard BC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewinesophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2010;199:594–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, Riegker FM, Kabon B, Fleischmann E, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhao Y. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Intract Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:366–9.CrossRef
31.
Berger AC, Bloommenthal A, Weksler B, Evans N, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:560–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complication and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, Hoshino M, Torgersen Z, Juhasz A, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:168–76.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy. Trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg. 2010;252:292–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decaluwe H, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2011;40:1455–65.
36.
Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:162–7.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Bakhos CT, Fabian T, Oyasiji TO, Gautam S, Gangadharan SP, Kent MS, et al. Impact of the surgical technique on pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:221–7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England. Ann Surg. 2012;255:197–203.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Tsukada K, Hasegawa T, Miyazaki T, Katoh H, Yoshikawa M, Masuda N, Kuwano H. Predictive value of interleukin-8 and granulocyte elastase in pulmonary complication after esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:167–71.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Fukuhara T, Kidokoro A, Fukunaga M, Nagasaki K, Suda M, Yoshikawa S. Kinetics of cytokines and PMN-E in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1484–7.
41.
Singh RK, Pham TH, Diggs BS, Perkins S, Hunter JG. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2011;146:711–4.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Biere SSA, Cuesta MA, Van Del Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:121–33.PubMed
43.
Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3031–40.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621–9.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multicenter, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:2.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, Brigand C, Carrere N, Collet D, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial—the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Bierre SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.CrossRef
48.
Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, Tokuhara N, Takemura M, Lee S, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1445–50.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review
Authors
Masayuki Watanabe
Yoshifumi Baba
Yohei Nagai
Hideo Baba
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Surgery Today 3/2013 Go to the issue

Case report

Diffuse gastroduodenitis and enteritis associated with ulcerative colitis and concomitant cytomegalovirus reactivation after total colectomy: report of a case

Case Report

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery used to perform transanal endoscopic microsurgery (SILSTEM) for T1 rectal cancer under spinal anesthesia: report of a case

How to Do It

Tricuspid leaflet augmentation with an autologous pericardial patch for recurrent severe tricuspid regurgitation that occurred after suture annuloplasty

Original Article

Significance of sonic hedgehog signaling after massive hepatectomy in a rat

Original Article

Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room

Original Article

Detection of pleural lymph flow using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in non-small cell lung cancer surgery: a preliminary study