Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 6/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Article

Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a single centre experience

Authors: Siwo Ernest Amos, Wu Shuo-Dong, Ying Fan, Yu Tian, Chun-Chih Chen

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the short-term outcomes of single-incision and conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) at a single surgical unit.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study comparing the operative outcomes of two LA techniques between January 2009 and November 2010.

Results

LA was performed successfully in 44 patients: through a single incision in 27 patients and through three incisions in 17 patients. The time taken to resume oral intake was slightly less in the single-incision group than in the three-incision group, at 1.1 versus 1.5 days, respectively (P = 0.0419). However, blood loss and hospital stay were not significantly different, at 7.2 versus 6.4 ml (P = 0.6244) and 3.7 versus 3.8 days (P = 0.8565), respectively. The cosmetic result was better in the single-incision group, because of the well-concealed scar.

Conclusion

Both single-incision and conventional LA are effective and minimally invasive, and should be performed according to the experience of the surgeon. Single-incision LA results in faster recovery, but larger studies are required to confirm this and to determine if these techniques can be used safely for all indications of appendectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hall Long K, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Hegelson ER, Harsen WS. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129:390–400. Hall Long K, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Hegelson ER, Harsen WS. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129:390–400.
2.
go back to reference Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED, Muhlbaier LH, Eubanks S. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery. 2003;135:479–88.CrossRef Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED, Muhlbaier LH, Eubanks S. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery. 2003;135:479–88.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, Balakrishnan S, El-Hasani S. Laparoscopic appendectomy in a District hospital: does the technique influence the outcome? J laparosc adv surg tech. 2008;18:204–8.CrossRef Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, Balakrishnan S, El-Hasani S. Laparoscopic appendectomy in a District hospital: does the technique influence the outcome? J laparosc adv surg tech. 2008;18:204–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg. 2009;33:208–14.PubMedCrossRef Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg. 2009;33:208–14.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sasaki A, Koeda K, Nakajima J, Obuchi T, Baba S, Wakabayashi G. Single-incision gastric resection for sub-mucosal tumors: report of three cases. Surg Today. 2011;41:133–6.PubMedCrossRef Sasaki A, Koeda K, Nakajima J, Obuchi T, Baba S, Wakabayashi G. Single-incision gastric resection for sub-mucosal tumors: report of three cases. Surg Today. 2011;41:133–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dutta S. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1741–5.PubMedCrossRef Dutta S. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1741–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37:588–94.PubMed Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37:588–94.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(1):25–8.PubMedCrossRef Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(1):25–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tian Y, Wu SD, Chen YS, Chen CC. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy using conventional instruments: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(9):1429–33.PubMedCrossRef Tian Y, Wu SD, Chen YS, Chen CC. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy using conventional instruments: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(9):1429–33.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a single centre experience
Authors
Siwo Ernest Amos
Wu Shuo-Dong
Ying Fan
Yu Tian
Chun-Chih Chen
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0110-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Surgery Today 6/2012 Go to the issue