Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 6/2020

01-08-2020 | Editors’ Note

Editors’ Note to: Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period

Author: Springer-Verlag France SAS

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

The Editor-in-Chief of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology are issuing an Editor’s Note for this article [1]. It was brought to our attention that the results overlap with a previously published article by Reddy et al. [2]. Despite reporting the same results, differences have been noted in the study design, data collection periods and methodologies described. The findings from the institutional investigation show that the current article [1] accurately reports the study. Since the investigation, the article published in International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences has been removed from the journal site; however, since this article is still accessible elsewhere, the Editor-in-Chief is publishing this Editor’s Note to alert the readership and provide clarification. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Reddy AG (2018) Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(7):1391–1395CrossRef Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Reddy AG (2018) Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(7):1391–1395CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reddy AG, Jangale A, Reddy RC, Sagi M, Gaikwad A, Reddy A (2017) To compare effect of combined block of adductor canal block (ACB) with IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) and adductor canal block (ACB) alone on total knee replacement in immediate postoperative rehabilitation. Int J Orthop Sci 3(2):141–145CrossRef Reddy AG, Jangale A, Reddy RC, Sagi M, Gaikwad A, Reddy A (2017) To compare effect of combined block of adductor canal block (ACB) with IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) and adductor canal block (ACB) alone on total knee replacement in immediate postoperative rehabilitation. Int J Orthop Sci 3(2):141–145CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Editors’ Note to: Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period
Author
Springer-Verlag France SAS
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02664-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 6/2020 Go to the issue