Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original Article • SPINE - FRACTURES

CT-guided cement sacroplasty (CSP) as pain therapy in non-dislocated insufficiency fractures

Authors: Reimer Andresen, Sebastian Radmer, Mathias Wollny, Julian Ramin Andresen, Urs Nissen, Hans-Christof Schober

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

In elderly patients with reduced bone quality, insufficiency fractures of the sacrum are relatively common and are typically associated with severe disabling pain. The objective of the present study was to examine the feasibility of cement augmentation by CSP, to determine post-interventional leakages and other complications, and to present the outcome of pain over the course of 18 months.

Materials and methods

In 23 patients (20 women and 3 men) with an average age of 81.3 (71–92) years, a total of 41 sacral fractures were detected by MRI, 5 of them unilateral and 18 bilateral. Conservative treatment initially performed over a period of 3 weeks did not bring any satisfactory reduction in the severe disabling pain. The indication for intervention was established after an interdisciplinary case conference. The intervention was performed under intubation anaesthesia. Single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis was given routinely immediately prior to the intervention. Under sterile conditions, a Jamshidi needle was then advanced into the respective fracture zone in the sacrum from dorsal to ventral (short axis) or from lateral to medial transiliac (transiliac axis). After removing the inner needle, a flexible osteotome was inserted through the positioned hollow needle and used to extend the spongious space in the fracture zone and thus prepare a cavity for the cement filling. High-viscosity PMMA cement was then inserted discontinuously with the aid of a pressure gauge under low-dose CT control. Cement leakages were determined in the CT image on the day after the intervention, all cement outside of the cortical boundary being rated as a leakage. Pain was documented on a visual analogue scale (VAS) on the day before the intervention, on the second day, and 6, 12, and 18 months after the intervention. Additionally occurring complications were recorded, and the patients were asked to rate their satisfaction after 6 and 18 months.

Results

CSP was technically feasible in all patients. In the control CT scan, sufficient cement distribution and interlocking with vital bone were found along the course of the fracture in the sacrum. An average of 6.0 ± 0.83 ml of cement was inserted per fracture. Leakage was found in 5 of 41 (12.2%) of the fractures treated, although none were symptomatic. The mean pain score on the VAS was 8.8 ± 0.59 before the intervention, a significant pain reduction (p < 0.0005) was seen on the second post-operative day, with an average value of 2.1 ± 0.36, and this was stable at 2.2 ± 0.28 after 6, 2.3 ± 0.31 after 12, and 2.2 ± 0.41 after 18 months. Now that they no longer experienced disabling pain, all of the patients were fully remobilised and discharged back home. A high level of patient satisfaction was found after 6 and 18 months.

Conclusion

As a minimally invasive procedure, CSP is an effective treatment method for rapid, significant, and sustained pain reduction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dasgupta B, Shah N, Brown H et al (1998) Sacral insufficiency fractures: an unsuspected cause of low back pain. Br J Rheumatol 37(7):789–793CrossRefPubMed Dasgupta B, Shah N, Brown H et al (1998) Sacral insufficiency fractures: an unsuspected cause of low back pain. Br J Rheumatol 37(7):789–793CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schindler OS, Watura R, Cobby M (2007) Sacral insufficiency fractures. J Orthopaedic Surg 15(3):339–346CrossRef Schindler OS, Watura R, Cobby M (2007) Sacral insufficiency fractures. J Orthopaedic Surg 15(3):339–346CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T (1988) Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:67–81PubMed Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T (1988) Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:67–81PubMed
4.
go back to reference Andresen R, Radmer S, Kamusella P et al (2012) Treatment of Denis 1, 2 and 3 insufficiency fracture zones of the os sacrum. Individual approaches adapted to the course of the fracture in CT-assisted balloon sacroplasty. Osteol 21(3):168–173 Andresen R, Radmer S, Kamusella P et al (2012) Treatment of Denis 1, 2 and 3 insufficiency fracture zones of the os sacrum. Individual approaches adapted to the course of the fracture in CT-assisted balloon sacroplasty. Osteol 21(3):168–173
5.
go back to reference Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W (2000) The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79(4):404–409CrossRefPubMed Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W (2000) The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79(4):404–409CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lin JT, Lane JM (2003) Sacral stress fractures. J Womens Health 12(9):879–888CrossRef Lin JT, Lane JM (2003) Sacral stress fractures. J Womens Health 12(9):879–888CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andresen R, Radmer S, Lüdtke CW et al (2015) Conservative therapy versus CT guided balloon sacroplasty in the treatment of insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. Osteol 24(2):92–98 (Article in German) Andresen R, Radmer S, Lüdtke CW et al (2015) Conservative therapy versus CT guided balloon sacroplasty in the treatment of insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. Osteol 24(2):92–98 (Article in German)
8.
go back to reference Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT (1996) Closed reduction and percutaneous skeletal fixation of sacral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:121–128CrossRef Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT (1996) Closed reduction and percutaneous skeletal fixation of sacral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:121–128CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tsiridis E, Upadhyay N, Gamie Z, Giannoudis PV (2007) Percutaneous screw fixation for insufficiency fractures: a review of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(12):1650–1653CrossRefPubMed Tsiridis E, Upadhyay N, Gamie Z, Giannoudis PV (2007) Percutaneous screw fixation for insufficiency fractures: a review of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(12):1650–1653CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Garant M (2002) Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(12):1265–1267CrossRefPubMed Garant M (2002) Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(12):1265–1267CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD et al (2010) Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(2):201–210CrossRefPubMed Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD et al (2010) Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(2):201–210CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bastian JD, Keel MJ, Heini PF et al (2012) Complications related to cement leakage in sacroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 78(1):100–105PubMed Bastian JD, Keel MJ, Heini PF et al (2012) Complications related to cement leakage in sacroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 78(1):100–105PubMed
13.
go back to reference Rommens PM, Hofmann A (2013) Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 44(12):1733–1744CrossRefPubMed Rommens PM, Hofmann A (2013) Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 44(12):1733–1744CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference DVO Guideline 2009 for Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Osteoporosis in Adults (2011) Osteol 20(1):55–74 DVO Guideline 2009 for Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Osteoporosis in Adults (2011) Osteol 20(1):55–74
15.
go back to reference Trouvin AP, Alcaix D, Somon T et al (2012) Analgesic effect of sacroplasty in osteoporotic sacral fractures: a study of six cases. Jt Bone Spine 79(5):500–503CrossRef Trouvin AP, Alcaix D, Somon T et al (2012) Analgesic effect of sacroplasty in osteoporotic sacral fractures: a study of six cases. Jt Bone Spine 79(5):500–503CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bayley E, Srinivas S, Boszczyk BM (2009) Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty in sacral insufficiency fractures: a review of the literature. Eur Spine J 18(9):1266–1271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bayley E, Srinivas S, Boszczyk BM (2009) Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty in sacral insufficiency fractures: a review of the literature. Eur Spine J 18(9):1266–1271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kortman K, Ortiz O, Miller T et al (2013) Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 5(5):461–466CrossRefPubMed Kortman K, Ortiz O, Miller T et al (2013) Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 5(5):461–466CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Eichler K, Zangos S, Mack MG et al (2014) Outcome of long-axis percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures with a radiofrequency-induced, high-viscosity bone cement. Skeletal Radiol 43(4):493–498CrossRefPubMed Eichler K, Zangos S, Mack MG et al (2014) Outcome of long-axis percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures with a radiofrequency-induced, high-viscosity bone cement. Skeletal Radiol 43(4):493–498CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Prokop A, Andresen R, Chmielnicki M (2016) Balloonsacroplasty: C-arm or CT controlled application?: Experience with 46 patients. Unfallchirurg 119(11):929–935 (Article in German) CrossRefPubMed Prokop A, Andresen R, Chmielnicki M (2016) Balloonsacroplasty: C-arm or CT controlled application?: Experience with 46 patients. Unfallchirurg 119(11):929–935 (Article in German) CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Andresen R, Radmer S, Andresen JR, Schober HC (2017) Comparison of the 18 months outcome after the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures by means of balloon sacroplasty (BSP) and radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) in comparison: A prospective randomised study. Eur Spine J 26(X):XXX-XXX [Epub ahead of print] Andresen R, Radmer S, Andresen JR, Schober HC (2017) Comparison of the 18 months outcome after the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures by means of balloon sacroplasty (BSP) and radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) in comparison: A prospective randomised study. Eur Spine J 26(X):XXX-XXX [Epub ahead of print]
21.
go back to reference Josten C, Höch A (2017) Fractures of the sacrum: operative/conservative. Pro: Why insufficiency fractures of the sacrum should be treated operatively. Die Wirbelsäule 01(01):31–40 (Article in German) CrossRef Josten C, Höch A (2017) Fractures of the sacrum: operative/conservative. Pro: Why insufficiency fractures of the sacrum should be treated operatively. Die Wirbelsäule 01(01):31–40 (Article in German) CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith DK, Dix JE (2006) Percutaneous sacroplasty: long axis injection technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1252–1255CrossRefPubMed Smith DK, Dix JE (2006) Percutaneous sacroplasty: long axis injection technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1252–1255CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Heron J, Connell DA, James SL (2007) CT-guided sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Clin Radiol 62(11):1094–1100CrossRefPubMed Heron J, Connell DA, James SL (2007) CT-guided sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Clin Radiol 62(11):1094–1100CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Grossterlinden L, Begemann PG, Lehmann W et al (2009) Sacroplasty in a cadaveric trial: comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance with and without ballon assistance. Eur Spine J 18(8):1226–1233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grossterlinden L, Begemann PG, Lehmann W et al (2009) Sacroplasty in a cadaveric trial: comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance with and without ballon assistance. Eur Spine J 18(8):1226–1233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Whitlow CT, Yazdani SK, Reedy ML et al (2007) Investigating sacroplasty: technical considerations and finite element analysis of polymethylmethacralate infusion into cadaveric sacrum. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(6):1036–1041CrossRefPubMed Whitlow CT, Yazdani SK, Reedy ML et al (2007) Investigating sacroplasty: technical considerations and finite element analysis of polymethylmethacralate infusion into cadaveric sacrum. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(6):1036–1041CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Frey ME, Depalma MJ, Cifu DX et al (2008) Percutaneous sacroplasty for sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective multicenter observational pilot study. Spine 8(2):367–373CrossRef Frey ME, Depalma MJ, Cifu DX et al (2008) Percutaneous sacroplasty for sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective multicenter observational pilot study. Spine 8(2):367–373CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Richards AM, Mears SC, Knight TA et al (2009) Biomechanical analysis of sacroplasty: does volume or location of cement matter? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(2):315–317CrossRefPubMed Richards AM, Mears SC, Knight TA et al (2009) Biomechanical analysis of sacroplasty: does volume or location of cement matter? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(2):315–317CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CT-guided cement sacroplasty (CSP) as pain therapy in non-dislocated insufficiency fractures
Authors
Reimer Andresen
Sebastian Radmer
Mathias Wollny
Julian Ramin Andresen
Urs Nissen
Hans-Christof Schober
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2001-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2017 Go to the issue