Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Original Article • HIP - FRACTURES

The epidemiology and functional outcomes of operative fixation of extracapsular proximal femoral fractures (AO 31-A) in young adults

Authors: D. N. Ramoutar, P. Kodumuri, J. N. Rodrigues, S. Olewicz, C. G. Moran, B. J. Ollivere, D. P. Forward, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Proximal femoral fractures in adults under 50 years are not as common as in the elderly, but may have just as significant an impact. There is little in the literature describing the functional outcomes of fixation in this age group. Our aim was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of operative management of extracapsular proximal femoral fractures (AO 31-A) in the young adult (<50 years). Consecutive skeletally mature patients <50 years undergoing operative fixation of these fractures were obtained from a prospective database over a 12-year period. Complications and mortality data were obtained from this database and case note review. Outcome scores were obtained via postal questionnaires. Eighty-eight patients were included in the study of which 74 (84%) had fixation with the dynamic hip screw. The mean age was 39 years (range 17–50) with a male preponderance (73.8%). Mean hospital stay was 14 days (range 2–94). Seventeen (19.3%) patients had died at a mean of 40 months from their operation date. The 1-year mortality was 4.5%. There were five complications (5.7%). SF-36 and EuroQol 5D scores showed that 5–10% had severe problems with a 20% decrease in quality of life compared to population norms. The biggest differences were in the physical function modalities. One-third had fair to poor hip function as assessed by the Oxford Hip Score. Though these injuries are relatively rare in this age group, they do have significant mortality and functional impairment reflecting a higher energy of injury rather than the frailty seen in the elderly.
Literature
1.
go back to reference White SM, Griffiths R (2011) Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS hip fracture anaesthesia network (HIPFAN). Injury 42(11):1230–1233CrossRefPubMed White SM, Griffiths R (2011) Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS hip fracture anaesthesia network (HIPFAN). Injury 42(11):1230–1233CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Verettas DA, Galanis B, Kazakos K et al (2002) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur in patients under 50 years of age. Injury 33(1):41–45CrossRefPubMed Verettas DA, Galanis B, Kazakos K et al (2002) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur in patients under 50 years of age. Injury 33(1):41–45CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Al-Ani AN, Neander G, Samuelsson B et al (2013) Risk factors for osteoporosis are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures regardless of trauma mechanism. Acta Orthop 84(1):54–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Ani AN, Neander G, Samuelsson B et al (2013) Risk factors for osteoporosis are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures regardless of trauma mechanism. Acta Orthop 84(1):54–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Protzman RR, Burkhalter WE (1976) Femoral-neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(5):689–695CrossRefPubMed Protzman RR, Burkhalter WE (1976) Femoral-neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(5):689–695CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Miller AG, Bercik MJ, Ong A (2011) Nonagenarian hip fracture: treatment and complications. J Trauma 72(5):1411–1415 Miller AG, Bercik MJ, Ong A (2011) Nonagenarian hip fracture: treatment and complications. J Trauma 72(5):1411–1415
6.
go back to reference Davidovitch RI, Jordan CJ, Egol KA et al (2010) Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the nonelderly adult. J Trauma 68(1):236–242CrossRefPubMed Davidovitch RI, Jordan CJ, Egol KA et al (2010) Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the nonelderly adult. J Trauma 68(1):236–242CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2122–2130PubMed Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2122–2130PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF (2008) Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2254–2266PubMed Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF (2008) Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2254–2266PubMed
9.
go back to reference Huang HK, Su YP, Chen CM et al (2010) Displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults treated with closed reduction and internal fixation. Orthopedics 33(12):873PubMed Huang HK, Su YP, Chen CM et al (2010) Displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults treated with closed reduction and internal fixation. Orthopedics 33(12):873PubMed
12.
go back to reference Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES et al (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13:890–895CrossRefPubMed Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES et al (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13:890–895CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A et al (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):185–190CrossRefPubMed Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A et al (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):185–190CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S et al (1999) Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(1):46–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S et al (1999) Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(1):46–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C et al (1998) Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 316(7133):736–741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C et al (1998) Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 316(7133):736–741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM et al (1995) Hip fractures in adults younger than 50 years of age. Epidemiology and results. Clin Orthop 312:238–246 Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM et al (1995) Hip fractures in adults younger than 50 years of age. Epidemiology and results. Clin Orthop 312:238–246
18.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Handoll HHG (2010) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews; 9: CD000093 Parker MJ, Handoll HHG (2010) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews; 9: CD000093
20.
go back to reference Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O et al (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331(7529):1374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O et al (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331(7529):1374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Pillai A, Eranki V, Shenoy R et al (2011) Age related incidence and early outcomes of hip fractures: a prospective cohort study of 1177 patients. J Orthop Surg Res 6:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pillai A, Eranki V, Shenoy R et al (2011) Age related incidence and early outcomes of hip fractures: a prospective cohort study of 1177 patients. J Orthop Surg Res 6:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW et al (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 146(3):435–443CrossRefPubMed Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW et al (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 146(3):435–443CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jonnes C, Shishir SM, Najimudeen S (2016) Type II intertrochanteric fractures: proximal femoral nailing (PFN) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS). Arch Bone Jt Surg 4(1):23–28PubMedPubMedCentral Jonnes C, Shishir SM, Najimudeen S (2016) Type II intertrochanteric fractures: proximal femoral nailing (PFN) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS). Arch Bone Jt Surg 4(1):23–28PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Bowers TR, Pryor GA (2012) Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94(3):391–397CrossRefPubMed Parker MJ, Bowers TR, Pryor GA (2012) Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94(3):391–397CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Wozasek GE, Vécsei V (2008) Femoral shortening after surgical treatment of trochanteric fractures in nongeriatric patients. J Trauma 64(4):982–989CrossRefPubMed Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Wozasek GE, Vécsei V (2008) Femoral shortening after surgical treatment of trochanteric fractures in nongeriatric patients. J Trauma 64(4):982–989CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fang C, Gudushauri P, Wong TM, Lau TW, Pun T, Leung F (2016) Increased fracture collapse after intertrochanteric fractures treated by the dynamic hip screw adversely affects walking ability but not survival. BioMed Res Int 2016:8. doi:10.1155/2016/4175092 Fang C, Gudushauri P, Wong TM, Lau TW, Pun T, Leung F (2016) Increased fracture collapse after intertrochanteric fractures treated by the dynamic hip screw adversely affects walking ability but not survival. BioMed Res Int 2016:8. doi:10.​1155/​2016/​4175092
27.
go back to reference Litwin MS, McGuigan KA (1999) Accuracy of recall in health-related quality-of-life assessment among men treated for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(9):2882–2888PubMed Litwin MS, McGuigan KA (1999) Accuracy of recall in health-related quality-of-life assessment among men treated for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(9):2882–2888PubMed
28.
go back to reference Mishra V, Thomas G, Sibly TF (2004) Results of displaced subcapital fractures treated by primary total hip replacement. Injury 35(2):157–160CrossRefPubMed Mishra V, Thomas G, Sibly TF (2004) Results of displaced subcapital fractures treated by primary total hip replacement. Injury 35(2):157–160CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1010–1014CrossRefPubMed Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1010–1014CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2009) Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 467(4):958–965CrossRefPubMed Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2009) Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 467(4):958–965CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The epidemiology and functional outcomes of operative fixation of extracapsular proximal femoral fractures (AO 31-A) in young adults
Authors
D. N. Ramoutar
P. Kodumuri
J. N. Rodrigues
S. Olewicz
C. G. Moran
B. J. Ollivere
D. P. Forward
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1887-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2/2017 Go to the issue