Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Three-dimensional analyses of proximal humeral fractures using computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction: early stability of fixation after osteosynthesis in relation to preoperative bone quality

Authors: Koki Ueda, Satoshi Ikemura, Akihisa Yamashita, Takashi Harada, Tetsuya Watanabe, Kenzo Shirasawa

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the bone quality of the humeral head measured by CT multiplanar reconstruction images (MPR) and the stability of nail or plate fixation and to compare the clinical outcomes of these procedures in patients with proximal humeral fractures. Thirty-six consecutive patients (nail group: n = 18, plate group: n = 18) were investigated. In nail group, 14 cases were classified as two-part fractures, three cases were classified as three-part fractures and one case was classified as four-part fractures. In plate group, three cases were classified as two-part fractures, nine cases were classified as three-part fractures and six cases were classified as four-part fractures. Both clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. In addition, the percentage of trabecular bone volume of the humeral head was calculated using preoperative CT-MPR images. Three patients in the nail group underwent reoperation. In contrast, no patients in the plate group underwent reoperation. In nail group, six of 18 (33 %) patients demonstrated poor results (three underwent reoperation, and three had varus displacements >10º) and had bone volume percentages (axial image) that were significantly lower than those observed in the patients with good results. The cutoff point of trabecular bone volume required to obtain satisfactory results after surgical treatment using intramedullary nail was 78 %. The results of this study suggest that the bone volume of the humeral head calculated using CT-MPR images provides useful information, in addition to the type of fracture, when selecting fixation devices for osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fracture.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agel J, Jones CB, Sanzone AG, Camuso M, Henley MB (2004) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polarus nail fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:191–195PubMedCrossRef Agel J, Jones CB, Sanzone AG, Camuso M, Henley MB (2004) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polarus nail fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:191–195PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92PubMedCrossRef Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bernard J, Charalambides C, Aderinto J, Mok D (2000) Early failure of intramedullary nailing for proximal humeral fractures. Injury 31:789–792PubMedCrossRef Bernard J, Charalambides C, Aderinto J, Mok D (2000) Early failure of intramedullary nailing for proximal humeral fractures. Injury 31:789–792PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:837–844PubMedCrossRef Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:837–844PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Stavridis SI, Petsatodis G, Christodoulou A (2009) Mid-term results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Philos plate. Injury 40:1292–1296PubMedCrossRef Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Stavridis SI, Petsatodis G, Christodoulou A (2009) Mid-term results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Philos plate. Injury 40:1292–1296PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Plecko M, Kraus A (2005) Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the locking proximal humerus plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17:25–50PubMedCrossRef Plecko M, Kraus A (2005) Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the locking proximal humerus plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17:25–50PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R (2005) A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:176–181PubMedCrossRef Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R (2005) A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:176–181PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Städele H, Messmer P, Morlock MM, Schneider E (2004) Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws. J Orthop Res 22:1237–1242PubMedCrossRef Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Städele H, Messmer P, Morlock MM, Schneider E (2004) Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws. J Orthop Res 22:1237–1242PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Morlock MM, Schneider E (2005) Mechanical behavior of screws in normal and osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S107–S111PubMedCrossRef Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Morlock MM, Schneider E (2005) Mechanical behavior of screws in normal and osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S107–S111PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2003) The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:611–617PubMedCrossRef Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2003) The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:611–617PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krappinger D, Roth T, Gschwentner M, Suckert A, Blauth M, Hengg C, Kralinger F (2012) Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data. Skeletal Radiol 41:299–304PubMedCrossRef Krappinger D, Roth T, Gschwentner M, Suckert A, Blauth M, Hengg C, Kralinger F (2012) Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data. Skeletal Radiol 41:299–304PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Neer CS 2nd (2002) Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:389–400PubMedCrossRef Neer CS 2nd (2002) Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:389–400PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164PubMedCrossRef Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Faraj D, Kooistra BW, Vd Stappen WA, Werre AJ (2011) Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than 2 years follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21:7–12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Faraj D, Kooistra BW, Vd Stappen WA, Werre AJ (2011) Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than 2 years follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21:7–12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Complication Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164CrossRef Complication Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhu Y, Lu Y, Shen J, Zhang J, Jiang C (2011) Locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment of two-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:159–168PubMedCrossRef Zhu Y, Lu Y, Shen J, Zhang J, Jiang C (2011) Locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment of two-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:159–168PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yamada M, Briot J, Pedrono A, Sans N, Mansat P, Mansat M, Swider P (2007) Age- and gender-related distribution of bone tissue of osteoporotic humeral head using computed tomography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:596–602PubMedCrossRef Yamada M, Briot J, Pedrono A, Sans N, Mansat P, Mansat M, Swider P (2007) Age- and gender-related distribution of bone tissue of osteoporotic humeral head using computed tomography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:596–602PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Benum P, Husby OS (1999) Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:143–147PubMedCrossRef Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Benum P, Husby OS (1999) Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:143–147PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ (2008) Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:42–54PubMedCrossRef Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ (2008) Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:42–54PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Liew AS, Johnson JA, Patterson SD, King GJ, Chess DG (2000) Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:423–426PubMedCrossRef Liew AS, Johnson JA, Patterson SD, King GJ, Chess DG (2000) Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:423–426PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rouleau DM, Laflamme GY, Berry GK, Harvey EJ, Delisle J, Girard J (2009) Proximal humerus fractures treated by percutaneous locking plate internal fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:56–62PubMedCrossRef Rouleau DM, Laflamme GY, Berry GK, Harvey EJ, Delisle J, Girard J (2009) Proximal humerus fractures treated by percutaneous locking plate internal fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:56–62PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stefano G, Vanna B, Giacomo D, Daniela D, Giulia B (2012) Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 9:37–39 Stefano G, Vanna B, Giacomo D, Daniela D, Giulia B (2012) Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 9:37–39
23.
go back to reference Georg O, Gerd D, Andrea T, Jan T, Christoph J, Pierre H (2012) Influence of trabecular microstructure and cortical index on the complexity of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:509–515CrossRef Georg O, Gerd D, Andrea T, Jan T, Christoph J, Pierre H (2012) Influence of trabecular microstructure and cortical index on the complexity of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:509–515CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee JS, Kim TH, Kang SY, Lee SH, Jung YB, Koo S, Chang SH, Lee WB, Jung HJ (2012) How isometric are the anatomic femoral tunnel and the anterior tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arthroscopy 28:1504–1512PubMedCrossRef Lee JS, Kim TH, Kang SY, Lee SH, Jung YB, Koo S, Chang SH, Lee WB, Jung HJ (2012) How isometric are the anatomic femoral tunnel and the anterior tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arthroscopy 28:1504–1512PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Brianza S, Plecko M, Gueorguiev B, Windolf M, Schwieger K (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation technique for internal fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures in a novel cadaveric model. Clin Biomech 25:886–892CrossRef Brianza S, Plecko M, Gueorguiev B, Windolf M, Schwieger K (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation technique for internal fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures in a novel cadaveric model. Clin Biomech 25:886–892CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD (2009) Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 23:113–119PubMedCrossRef Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD (2009) Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 23:113–119PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Konrad G, Audigé L, Lambert S, Hertel R, Südkamp NP (2012) Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:602–609PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Konrad G, Audigé L, Lambert S, Hertel R, Südkamp NP (2012) Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:602–609PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Three-dimensional analyses of proximal humeral fractures using computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction: early stability of fixation after osteosynthesis in relation to preoperative bone quality
Authors
Koki Ueda
Satoshi Ikemura
Akihisa Yamashita
Takashi Harada
Tetsuya Watanabe
Kenzo Shirasawa
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1318-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2014 Go to the issue