Top

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Published in:

01-10-2014 | Original Article

Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fractures

Authors: Sheethal Prasad Patange Subba Rao, James Lewis, Ziad Haddad, Vishal Paringe, Khitish Mohanty

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 7/2014

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility between the three-column classification and Schatzker classification systems using 2D and 3D CT models.

Materials and methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients with tibial plateau fractures were evaluated by five orthopaedic surgeons. All patients were classified into Schatzker and three-column classification systems using x-rays and 2D and 3D CT images. The inter-observer reliability was evaluated in the first round and the intra-observer reliability was determined during the second round 2 weeks later.

Results

The average intra-observer reproducibility for the three-column classification was from substantial to excellent in all sub classifications, as compared with Schatzker classification. The inter-observer kappa values increased from substantial to excellent in three-column classification and to moderate in Schatzker classification The average values for three-column classification for all the categories are as follows: (I–III) k2D = 0.718, 95 % CI 0.554–0.864, p < 0.0001 and average 3D = 0.874, 95 % CI 0.754–0.890, p < 0.0001. For Schatzker classification system, the average values for all six categories are as follows: (I–VI) k2D = 0.536, 95 % CI 0.365–0.685, p < 0.0001 and average k3D = 0.552 95 % CI 0.405–0.700, p < 0.0001. The values are statistically significant.

Conclusion

Statistically significant inter-observer values in both rounds were noted with the three-column classification, making it statistically an excellent agreement. The intra-observer reproducibility for the three-column classification improved as compared with the Schatzker classification. The three-column classification seems to be an effective way to characterise and classify fractures of tibial plateau.

Biggi F, Di Fabio S, D’Antimo C, Trevisani S (2010) Tibial plateau fractures: internal fixation with locking plates and the MIPO technique. Injury Int J Care Injured 41:1178–1182CrossRef

Chin TYP, Bardana D, Bailey M, Williamson OD, Miller R, Edwards ER, Esser MP (2005) Functional outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated with the fine-wire fixator. Injury Int J Care Injured 36:1467–1475CrossRef

Schatzker J (1987) Fractures of the tibial plateau. In: Schatzker J, Tile M (eds) The rationale of operative fracture care. Springer, New York, pp 279–295CrossRef

Watson JT (1994) High-energy Fractures of the tibial plateau. Orthop Clin North Am 25(4):723–751PubMed

Ali AM, Yang L, Hashmi M, Saleh M (2001) Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures managed with the Sheffield Hybrid Fixator Biomechanical study and operative technique-Injury. Int J Care Injured 32:86–91CrossRef

Doornberg JN, Rademakers MV, Van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Ahn J, Steller EPh, Kloen P (2011) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterisation of tibial plateau fractures. Injury Int J Care Injured 42:1416–1425CrossRef

Hu YL, Ye FG, Ji AY, Qiao GX, Liu HF (2009) Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Injury Int J Care Injured 40:1282–1285CrossRef

Tscherne H, Lobenhoffer P (1993) Tibial plateau fractures. Management and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:87–100PubMed

Koval KJ, Helfet DL (1995) Tibial plateau fractures: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 3:86–94PubMed

10.

Papagelopoulos PJ, Partsinevelos AA, Themistocleous GS et al (2006) Complications after tibia plateau fracture surgery. Injury 37(6):475–484PubMedCrossRef

11.

Hohl M, Moore TM (1990) Articular fractures of the proximal tibia. In: Evarts CM (ed) Surgery of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York

12.

Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D (1979) The tibial plateau fracture; The Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:94–104PubMed

13.

Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures in long bones. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

14.

Maripuri SN, Rao P, Manoj-Thomas A, Mohanty K (2008) The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: how reliable are they? Injury Int J Care Injured 39:1216–1221CrossRef

15.

Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng B (2010) Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(11):683–692PubMedCrossRef

16.

Suero EM, Hufner T, Stubig T, Krettek C, Citak M (2010) Use of a virtual 3D software for planning of tibial plateau fracture reconstruction. Injury Int J Care Injured 41:589–591CrossRef

17.

Brunner A, Horisberger M, Ulmar B, Hoffmann A, Babst R (2012) Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability? Injury 41(2):173–178CrossRef

18.

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef

19.

Charalambous CP, Tryfonidis M, Alvi F et al (2007) Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(4):400–404PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

20.

Malek IA, Machani B, Mevcha AM, Hyder NH (2006) Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the Weber classification of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(9):1204–1206PubMedCrossRef

21.

Walton NP, Harish S, Roberts C, Blundell C (2003) AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(8):396–398PubMedCrossRef

22.

Smith SW, Meyer RA, Connor PM et al (1996) Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the modified Ficat classification system of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(11):1702–1706PubMed

23.

Wainwright AM, Williams JR, Carr AJ (2000) Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:636–642PubMedCrossRef

24.

Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T et al (1993) The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(12):1745–1750PubMed

25.

Chan PS, Klimkiewicz JJ, Luchetti WT et al (1997) Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 7:484–489CrossRef

26.

Wicky S, Blaser PF, Blanc CH et al (2000) Comparison between standard radiography and spiral CT with 3D reconstruction in the evaluation, classification and management of tibial plateau fractures. Eur Radiol 10:1227–1232PubMedCrossRef

27.

Yacoubian SV, Nevins RT, Sallis JG et al (2002) Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16:632–637PubMedCrossRef

28.

Kode L, Lieberman JM, Motta AO, Wilber JH, Vasen A, Yagan R (1994) Evaluation of tibial plateau fractures: efficacy of MR imaging compared with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(1):141–147PubMedCrossRef

29.

Pilson HT, Reddix Jr RN, Mutty CE, Webb LX (2008) The long lost art of preoperative planning—resurrected? Orthopedics 31

30.

Citak M, Citak M, Kendoff D et al. (2009) Estimation of pretraumatic femoral antetorsion in bilateral femoral shaft fractures. Skeletal Radiol

31.

Citak M, Gardner MJ, Kendoff D et al (2008) Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture Reduction. J Orthop Res 26:547–552PubMedCrossRef

32.

Gosling T, Klingler K, Geerling J et al (2009) Improved intra-operative reduction control using a three-dimensional mobile image intensifier—a proximal tibia cadaver study. Knee 16:58–63PubMedCrossRef

33.

HacklW Riedl J, Reichkendler M et al (2001) Preoperative computerized tomography diagnosis of fractures of the tibial plateau. Unfallchirurg 104:519–523CrossRef

34.

Atesok K, Finkelstein J, Khoury A, Peyser A, Weil Y, Liebergall M, Mosheiff R (2007) The use of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (ISO-C-3D) in fixation of intraarticular fractures. Injury Int J Care Injured 38:1163–1169CrossRef

Title: Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fractures
Authors: Sheethal Prasad Patange Subba Rao
James Lewis
Ziad Haddad
Vishal Paringe
Khitish Mohanty
Publication date: 01-10-2014
Publisher: Springer Paris
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1308-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fractures

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

Medial humeral condyle fractures in adolescents: treatment and complications

Oral oxycodone plus intravenous acetaminophen versus intravenous morphine sulfate in acute bone fracture pain control: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

Treatment of isolated diaphyseal fractures of the radius with an intramedullary nail in adults

A modified posterolateral approach for Hoffa fracture

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review

Morphological evaluation of the distal interosseous membrane using ultrasound