Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Correlation between pre-injury mobility and ASA score with the mortality following femoral neck fracture in elderly

Authors: Adnan A. Faraj, Vijay Patel

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

A poor pre-injury mobility and high American Society of Anaesthiologist (ASA) grading is thought to be associated with a poor survival following surgical treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly. Hence there are concerns among orthopaedic surgeons about surgical treatment in this group of patients. In this retrospective study, the pre-injury mobility and ASA scores of 401 patients with fractured neck of femur treated by surgery was assessed in relation to mortality following surgery within the first 30 days of injury. Following surgery, a temporary deterioration in the ASA grading and mobility was noticed. Patients who required intensive medical care following surgery had higher mortality rate. The mortality was 15% among patients with ASA III and 40% among patients with ASA IV. 14% of 65 immobile patients, 18% of those mobile with Zimmer frame passed away after surgery for femoral neck fracture. 6.1% of ASA I scorers died compared with 40% of ASA IV scorers; this difference was statistically significant (χ2=13.883, df=1, P<0.001). Significant number of patients with ASA-IV (60%) and immobile patients (88%) survived following surgery for femoral neck fracture. Poor pre-injury mobility and high ASA scoring are associated with higher early mortality following surgery for femoral neck fracture, however, this should not preclude surgery for patients with poor pre-injury ASA grading and mobility sustaining femoral neck fracture, as significant number of our patients survived.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Finsen V, Borset M, Rossvoll I (1995) Mobility, survival and nursing-home requirements after hip fracture. Ann Chir Gynaecol 84:291–294PubMed Finsen V, Borset M, Rossvoll I (1995) Mobility, survival and nursing-home requirements after hip fracture. Ann Chir Gynaecol 84:291–294PubMed
2.
go back to reference Fox KM, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR, Felsenthal G, Clark M, Zimmerman SI, Kenzora JE, Magaziner JJ (1998) Mobility after hip fracture predicts health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:169–173PubMed Fox KM, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR, Felsenthal G, Clark M, Zimmerman SI, Kenzora JE, Magaziner JJ (1998) Mobility after hip fracture predicts health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:169–173PubMed
3.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Anand JK (1991) What is the true mortality of hip fractures? Public Health 105:443–466CrossRefPubMed Parker MJ, Anand JK (1991) What is the true mortality of hip fractures? Public Health 105:443–466CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Palmer CR (1993) A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:797–798PubMed Parker MJ, Palmer CR (1993) A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:797–798PubMed
5.
go back to reference Simanski C, Bouillon B, Lefering R, Zumsande N, Tiling T (2002) What prognostic factors correlate with activities of daily living (Barthel Index) 1 year after para-articular hip fracture? A prospective observational study. Unfallchirurg 105:99–107CrossRefPubMed Simanski C, Bouillon B, Lefering R, Zumsande N, Tiling T (2002) What prognostic factors correlate with activities of daily living (Barthel Index) 1 year after para-articular hip fracture? A prospective observational study. Unfallchirurg 105:99–107CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Correlation between pre-injury mobility and ASA score with the mortality following femoral neck fracture in elderly
Authors
Adnan A. Faraj
Vijay Patel
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-005-0026-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2/2006 Go to the issue