Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Original Article

The spino-pelvic ratio: a novel global sagittal parameter associated with clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients

Authors: Wesley M. Durand, Alan H. Daniels, David K. Hamilton, Peter Passias, Han Jo Kim, Themistocles Protopsaltis, Virginie LaFage, Justin S. Smith, Christopher Shaffrey, Munish Gupta, Michael P. Kelly, Eric Klineberg, Frank Schwab, Doug Burton, Shay Bess, Christopher Ames, Robert Hart, International Spine Study Group (ISSG)

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Analysis of interactions of spinal alignment metrics may uncover novel alignment parameters, similar to PI-LL. This study utilized a data-driven approach to hypothesis generation by testing all possible division interactions between spinal alignment parameters.

Methods

This study was a retrospective cohort analysis. In total, 1439 patients with baseline ODI were included for hypothesis generation. In total, 666 patients had 2-year postoperative follow-up and were included for validation. All possible combinations of division interactions between baseline metrics were assessed with linear regression against baseline ODI.

Results

From 247 raw alignment metrics, 32,398 division interactions were considered in hypothesis generation. Conceptually, the TPA divided by PI is a measure of the relative alignment of the line connecting T1 to the femoral head and the line perpendicular to the sacral endplate. The mean TPA/PI was 0.41 at baseline and 0.30 at 2 years postoperatively. Higher TPA/PI was associated with worse baseline ODI (p < 0.0001). The change in ODI at 2 years was linearly associated with the change in TPA/PI (p = 0.0172). The optimal statistical grouping of TPA/PI was low/normal (≤ 0.2), medium (0.2–0.4), and high (> 0.4). The R-squared for ODI against categorical TPA/PI alone (0.154) was directionally higher than that for each of the individual Schwab modifiers (SVA: 0.138, PI-LL 0.111, PT 0.057).

Conclusion

This study utilized a data-driven approach for hypothesis generation and identified the spino-pelvic ratio (TPA divided by PI) as a promising measure of sagittal spinal alignment among ASD patients. Patients with SPR > 0.2 exhibited inferior ODI scores.

Level of evidence

III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pellisé F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M, Domingo-Sàbat M, Bagó J, Pérez-Grueso FJ, Alanay A, Mannion A, Acaroglu E, Group ESS (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24(1):3–11CrossRef Pellisé F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M, Domingo-Sàbat M, Bagó J, Pérez-Grueso FJ, Alanay A, Mannion A, Acaroglu E, Group ESS (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24(1):3–11CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lafage V, Smith JS, Bess S, Berven SH, Mundis GM, Sethi RK, Deinlein DA, Coe JD (2016) Adult spinal deformity: epidemiology, health impact, evaluation, and management. Spine Deform 4(4):310–322CrossRef Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lafage V, Smith JS, Bess S, Berven SH, Mundis GM, Sethi RK, Deinlein DA, Coe JD (2016) Adult spinal deformity: epidemiology, health impact, evaluation, and management. Spine Deform 4(4):310–322CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fu K-MG, Bess RS, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Smith JS, Akbarnia BA, Ames CP, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC (2012) Health impact comparison of different disease states and population norms to adult spinal deformity (ASD): a call for medical attention. Spine J 12(9):S2CrossRef Fu K-MG, Bess RS, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Smith JS, Akbarnia BA, Ames CP, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC (2012) Health impact comparison of different disease states and population norms to adult spinal deformity (ASD): a call for medical attention. Spine J 12(9):S2CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schwab F, Dubey A, Pagala M, Gamez L, Farcy JP (2003) Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36. Spine 28(6):602–606PubMed Schwab F, Dubey A, Pagala M, Gamez L, Farcy JP (2003) Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36. Spine 28(6):602–606PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bess S, Line B, Fu K-M, McCarthy I, Lafage V, Schwab F, Shaffrey C, Ames C, Akbarnia B, Jo H (2016) The health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity: comparison of deformity types to United States population norms and chronic diseases. Spine 41(3):224CrossRef Bess S, Line B, Fu K-M, McCarthy I, Lafage V, Schwab F, Shaffrey C, Ames C, Akbarnia B, Jo H (2016) The health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity: comparison of deformity types to United States population norms and chronic diseases. Spine 41(3):224CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38(13):E803–E812CrossRef Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38(13):E803–E812CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, DeWald C, Mehdian H, Shaffrey C, Tribus C (2012) Scoliosis Research Society—Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine 37(12):1077–1082CrossRef Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, DeWald C, Mehdian H, Shaffrey C, Tribus C (2012) Scoliosis Research Society—Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine 37(12):1077–1082CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zygourakis CC, Liu CY, Keefe M, Moriates C, Ratliff J, Dudley RA, Gonzales R, Mummaneni PV, Ames CP (2017) Analysis of national rates, cost, and sources of cost variation in adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 82(3):378–387CrossRef Zygourakis CC, Liu CY, Keefe M, Moriates C, Ratliff J, Dudley RA, Gonzales R, Mummaneni PV, Ames CP (2017) Analysis of national rates, cost, and sources of cost variation in adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 82(3):378–387CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Lafage R, Hostin R, O’Brien M, Boachie-Adjei O, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM (2016) Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective, multicenter, propensity-matched cohort assessment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 78(6):851–861CrossRef Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Lafage R, Hostin R, O’Brien M, Boachie-Adjei O, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM (2016) Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective, multicenter, propensity-matched cohort assessment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 78(6):851–861CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C (2009) Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine 34(20):2171–2178CrossRef Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C (2009) Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine 34(20):2171–2178CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, Fu K-MG, Burton D, Hostin R, Klineberg E (2013) The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73(4):559–568CrossRef Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, Fu K-MG, Burton D, Hostin R, Klineberg E (2013) The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73(4):559–568CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(5):609CrossRef Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(5):609CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19(11):1824–1836CrossRef Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19(11):1824–1836CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Obeid I, Boissiere L, Yilgor C, Larrieu D, Pellise F, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Perez-Grueso FJ, Kleinstuck F, Vital JM, Bourghli A (2016) Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning. Eur Spine J 25(11):3644–3649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4649-3CrossRefPubMed Obeid I, Boissiere L, Yilgor C, Larrieu D, Pellise F, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Perez-Grueso FJ, Kleinstuck F, Vital JM, Bourghli A (2016) Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning. Eur Spine J 25(11):3644–3649. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-016-4649-3CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35(25):2224–2231CrossRef Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35(25):2224–2231CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bezanson J, Karpinski S, Shah VB, Edelman A (2012) Julia: a fast dynamic language for technical computing. arXiv:12095145 Bezanson J, Karpinski S, Shah VB, Edelman A (2012) Julia: a fast dynamic language for technical computing. arXiv:​12095145
19.
go back to reference Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V (2014) TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.M.01459CrossRefPubMed Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V (2014) TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1631–1640. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​jbjs.​M.​01459CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ryan DJ, Protopsaltis TS, Ames CP, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Mundis GM, Obeid I, Kebaish K, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O (2014) T1 pelvic angle (TPA) effectively evaluates sagittal deformity and assesses radiographical surgical outcomes longitudinally. Spine 39(15):1203–1210CrossRef Ryan DJ, Protopsaltis TS, Ames CP, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Mundis GM, Obeid I, Kebaish K, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O (2014) T1 pelvic angle (TPA) effectively evaluates sagittal deformity and assesses radiographical surgical outcomes longitudinally. Spine 39(15):1203–1210CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Yasuda T, Oe S, Hoshino H, Matsuyama Y (2016) The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers. Eur Spine J 25(11):3687–3693CrossRef Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Yasuda T, Oe S, Hoshino H, Matsuyama Y (2016) The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers. Eur Spine J 25(11):3687–3693CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRef Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422CrossRef Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine 41(1):62–68CrossRef Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine 41(1):62–68CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Protopsaltis TS, Soroceanu A, Tishelman JC, Buckland AJ, Mundis GM, Smith JS, Daniels AH, Lenke LG, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Ames CP (2017) Should targets for adult spinal deformity correction depend on pelvic incidence? The Spine J 17(10):S225–S226 Protopsaltis TS, Soroceanu A, Tishelman JC, Buckland AJ, Mundis GM, Smith JS, Daniels AH, Lenke LG, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Ames CP (2017) Should targets for adult spinal deformity correction depend on pelvic incidence? The Spine J 17(10):S225–S226
26.
go back to reference Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Boissiere L, Obeid I, Acaroglu E, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(19):1661–1672 Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Boissiere L, Obeid I, Acaroglu E, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(19):1661–1672
Metadata
Title
The spino-pelvic ratio: a novel global sagittal parameter associated with clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients
Authors
Wesley M. Durand
Alan H. Daniels
David K. Hamilton
Peter Passias
Han Jo Kim
Themistocles Protopsaltis
Virginie LaFage
Justin S. Smith
Christopher Shaffrey
Munish Gupta
Michael P. Kelly
Eric Klineberg
Frank Schwab
Doug Burton
Shay Bess
Christopher Ames
Robert Hart
International Spine Study Group (ISSG)
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06472-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

European Spine Journal 9/2020 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcement