Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Osteoporosis | Original Article

Early vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of fracture for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures: subgroup analysis of the VAPOUR trial and review of the literature

Authors: Terrence Diamond, William Clark, Paul Bird, Peter Gonski, Elizabeth Barnes, Val Gebski

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

VAPOUR found vertebroplasty (V) more effective than placebo (P) in patients with severe pain and fracture duration less than 6 weeks. Exploratory analysis suggested that benefits were concentrated in the subgroup of patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration. This difference may account for the three negative blinded trials that included few patients within this fracture time frame.

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of early vertebroplasty for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures within 3 weeks of fracture onset in the VAPOUR study.

Methods

Spearman’s rank log coefficients were calculated to reassess the relationship of pain reduction from vertebroplasty and fracture duration in the VAPOUR trial. We more fully report baseline and outcome data in patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration.

Results

There were 46V and 47P patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration. Baseline characteristics were similar. In total, 86 patients (41V, 45P) completed the 14-day questionnaire. The proportion of patients with reduction in pain from severe (NRS ≥ 7/10 was an inclusion requirement) to mild (NRS < 4) at 14 days was 21 (51%) V-group and 9 (20%) in the P-group (between-group difference 31 percentage points, 95% CI 12–50; p = 0.002). Early vertebroplasty provided greater reductions in mean NRS pain and Roland–Morris Disability.

Conclusion

Analysis of this patient subgroup from the VAPOUR trial, in the context of other randomised trial evidence, suggests clinically significant benefits from early vertebroplasty if performed within 3 weeks of fracture.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 388:1408–1416CrossRef Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 388:1408–1416CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361:569–579CrossRef Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361:569–579CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124CrossRef Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kujik C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148CrossRef Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kujik C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Jonsson B, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (2005) Long term morbidity and mortality after a clinically diagnosed vertebral fracture in the elderly—a 12 and 22 year follow up of 257 patients. Calcif Tissue Int 76(4):235–242CrossRef Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Jonsson B, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (2005) Long term morbidity and mortality after a clinically diagnosed vertebral fracture in the elderly—a 12 and 22 year follow up of 257 patients. Calcif Tissue Int 76(4):235–242CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA (2003) Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 114:257–265CrossRef Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA (2003) Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 114:257–265CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Diamond TH, Clark WA, Kumar SV (2007) Histomorphometric analysis of fracture healing cascade in acute osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Bone 40(3):775–780CrossRef Diamond TH, Clark WA, Kumar SV (2007) Histomorphometric analysis of fracture healing cascade in acute osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Bone 40(3):775–780CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA et al (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294CrossRef Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA et al (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yang EZ, Xu JG, Huang GZ et al (2016) Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 41:653–656CrossRef Yang EZ, Xu JG, Huang GZ et al (2016) Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 41:653–656CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen JM (2010) Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study. Spine 35:478–482CrossRef Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen JM (2010) Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study. Spine 35:478–482CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E (2015) Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res 10:24CrossRef Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E (2015) Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res 10:24CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lambert RGW, Golmohammadi K, Majumdar SR et al (2007) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006349 Lambert RGW, Golmohammadi K, Majumdar SR et al (2007) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006349
25.
go back to reference Staples MP, Kallmes DF, Comstock BA et al (2011) Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis. BMJ 342:d3952CrossRef Staples MP, Kallmes DF, Comstock BA et al (2011) Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis. BMJ 342:d3952CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ong KL, Beall DP, Frohberg M, Lau E, Hirsch JA (2018) Were VCF patients at higher risk of mortality following the 2009 publication of vertebroplasty “sham” trials? Osteoporos Int 29:375–383CrossRef Ong KL, Beall DP, Frohberg M, Lau E, Hirsch JA (2018) Were VCF patients at higher risk of mortality following the 2009 publication of vertebroplasty “sham” trials? Osteoporos Int 29:375–383CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of fracture for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures: subgroup analysis of the VAPOUR trial and review of the literature
Authors
Terrence Diamond
William Clark
Paul Bird
Peter Gonski
Elizabeth Barnes
Val Gebski
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06362-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

European Spine Journal 7/2020 Go to the issue