Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Original Article

Preclinical evaluation of a novel anterior non-fusion fixation device for atlantoaxial instability: an in vivo comparison study in a canine model

Authors: Xuan Cai, Xiaoqing Yi, Haopeng Li, Xijing He

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The Anterior Atlantoaxial Non-Fusion Fixation System (AANFS) was a novel motion preservation device for atlantoaxial instability to replace traditional fusion techniques. The purpose of this in vivo study was to evaluate the clinical features and biomechanical properties of this new device in a canine model by comparing it with a conventional method.

Methods

Eighteen adult male canines were randomly divided into group 1, which received the AANFS replacement, group 2 which received the Harms rigid fixation procedures, and group 3, which served as the control group. Routine follow-up evaluations were performed postoperatively. Specimens were harvested 12 weeks after the operation. Biomechanical tests were conducted to obtain the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) at C1–C2 segment in different groups.

Results

The canines successfully tolerated the entire experimental procedure. No significant differences were found in surgery time, blood loss and recovery time between the AANFS group and the Harms rigid fixation group. Radiological examinations revealed that the position of the implant was good. Biomechanical results showed that, compared with the intact group, the mean ROM and NZ in flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation were significantly reduced after rigid fixation. However, after the AANFS implantation, ROM and NZ in all directions were similar to those of the intact state.

Conclusions

This study for the first time provides an animal model for studying non-fusion strategies of upper cervical spine. The AANFS was able to maintain movement function of the atlantoaxial joint and may be an alternative to traditional fusion techniques.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Dickman CA, Crawford NR, Brantley AG, Sonntag VK (1995) Biomechanical effects of transoral odontoidectomy. Neurosurgery 36:1146–1152CrossRefPubMed Dickman CA, Crawford NR, Brantley AG, Sonntag VK (1995) Biomechanical effects of transoral odontoidectomy. Neurosurgery 36:1146–1152CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Elliott RE, Tanweer O, Boah A, Morsi A, Ma T, Frempong-Boadu A et al (2014) Outcome comparison of atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws and screw-rod constructs: meta-analysis and review of literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:11–28CrossRefPubMed Elliott RE, Tanweer O, Boah A, Morsi A, Ma T, Frempong-Boadu A et al (2014) Outcome comparison of atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws and screw-rod constructs: meta-analysis and review of literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:11–28CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Du JY, Aichmair A, Kueper J, Wright T, Lebl DR (2015) Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 22:151–161CrossRefPubMed Du JY, Aichmair A, Kueper J, Wright T, Lebl DR (2015) Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 22:151–161CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rajinda P, Towiwat S, Chirappapha P (2017) Comparison of outcomes after atlantoaxial fusion with C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screws and C1–C2 transarticular screws. Eur Spine J 26:1064–1072CrossRefPubMed Rajinda P, Towiwat S, Chirappapha P (2017) Comparison of outcomes after atlantoaxial fusion with C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screws and C1–C2 transarticular screws. Eur Spine J 26:1064–1072CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Elbadrawi AM, Elkhateeb TM (2017) Transoral approach for odontoidectomy efficacy and safety. HSS J 13:276–281CrossRefPubMed Elbadrawi AM, Elkhateeb TM (2017) Transoral approach for odontoidectomy efficacy and safety. HSS J 13:276–281CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shriver MF, Kshettry VR, Sindwani R, Woodard T, Benzel EC, Recinos PF (2016) Transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 148:121–129CrossRefPubMed Shriver MF, Kshettry VR, Sindwani R, Woodard T, Benzel EC, Recinos PF (2016) Transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 148:121–129CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Derman PB, Lampe LP, Lyman S, Kueper J, Pan TJ, Girardi FP et al (2016) Atlantoaxial fusion: sixteen years of epidemiology, indications, and complications in New York State. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1586–1592CrossRef Derman PB, Lampe LP, Lyman S, Kueper J, Pan TJ, Girardi FP et al (2016) Atlantoaxial fusion: sixteen years of epidemiology, indications, and complications in New York State. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1586–1592CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cai X, He X, Li H, Wang D (2013) Total atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty system: a novel motion preservation device for atlantoaxial instability after odontoidectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:451–457CrossRef Cai X, He X, Li H, Wang D (2013) Total atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty system: a novel motion preservation device for atlantoaxial instability after odontoidectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:451–457CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lu B, He X, Zhao CG, Li HP, Wang D (2009) Biomechanical study of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1893–1899CrossRef Lu B, He X, Zhao CG, Li HP, Wang D (2009) Biomechanical study of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1893–1899CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP (2002) Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 51:1351–1356CrossRefPubMed Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP (2002) Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 51:1351–1356CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tanenbaum JE, Lubelski D, Rosenbaum BP, Thompson NR, Benzel EC, Mroz TE (2016) Predictors of outcomes and hospital charges following atlantoaxial fusion. Spine J 16:608–618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tanenbaum JE, Lubelski D, Rosenbaum BP, Thompson NR, Benzel EC, Mroz TE (2016) Predictors of outcomes and hospital charges following atlantoaxial fusion. Spine J 16:608–618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Skeppholm M, Lindgren L, Henriques T, Vavruch L, Löfgren H, Olerud C (2015) The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy—a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine J 15:1284–1294CrossRefPubMed Skeppholm M, Lindgren L, Henriques T, Vavruch L, Löfgren H, Olerud C (2015) The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy—a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine J 15:1284–1294CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Moriguchi Y, Mojica-Santiago J, Grunert P, Pennicooke B, Berlin C, Khair T et al (2017) Total disc replacement using tissue-engineered intervertebral discs in the canine cervical spine. PLoS ONE 12:e0185716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moriguchi Y, Mojica-Santiago J, Grunert P, Pennicooke B, Berlin C, Khair T et al (2017) Total disc replacement using tissue-engineered intervertebral discs in the canine cervical spine. PLoS ONE 12:e0185716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Grunert P, Moriguchi Y, Grossbard BP, Ricart Arbona RJ, Bonassar LJ, Härtl R (2017) Degenerative changes of the canine cervical spine after discectomy procedures, an in vivo study. BMC Vet Res 13:193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grunert P, Moriguchi Y, Grossbard BP, Ricart Arbona RJ, Bonassar LJ, Härtl R (2017) Degenerative changes of the canine cervical spine after discectomy procedures, an in vivo study. BMC Vet Res 13:193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Farrokhi MR, Torabinezhad S, Ghajar KA (2010) Pilot study of a new acrylic cage in a dog cervical spine fusion model. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:272–277CrossRefPubMed Farrokhi MR, Torabinezhad S, Ghajar KA (2010) Pilot study of a new acrylic cage in a dog cervical spine fusion model. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:272–277CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Johnson JA, da Costa RC, Bhattacharya S, Goel V, Allen MJ (2011) Kinematic motion patterns of the cranial and caudal canine cervical spine. Vet Surg 40:720–727CrossRefPubMed Johnson JA, da Costa RC, Bhattacharya S, Goel V, Allen MJ (2011) Kinematic motion patterns of the cranial and caudal canine cervical spine. Vet Surg 40:720–727CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shriver MF, Kshettry VR, Sindwani R, Woodard T, Benzel EC, Recinos PF (2016) Transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 148:121–129CrossRefPubMed Shriver MF, Kshettry VR, Sindwani R, Woodard T, Benzel EC, Recinos PF (2016) Transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 148:121–129CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, Hwang TJ, Lee KW, Balabhadra RS et al (2004) Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability. J Neurosurg 100(3 Suppl Spine):277–283PubMed Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, Hwang TJ, Lee KW, Balabhadra RS et al (2004) Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability. J Neurosurg 100(3 Suppl Spine):277–283PubMed
21.
go back to reference Ohe M, Moridaira H, Inami S, Takeuchi D, Nohara Y, Taneichi H (2018) Pedicle screws with a thin hydroxyapatite coating for improving fixation at the bone-implant interface in the osteoporotic spine: experimental study in a porcine model. J Neurosurg Spine 28:679–687CrossRefPubMed Ohe M, Moridaira H, Inami S, Takeuchi D, Nohara Y, Taneichi H (2018) Pedicle screws with a thin hydroxyapatite coating for improving fixation at the bone-implant interface in the osteoporotic spine: experimental study in a porcine model. J Neurosurg Spine 28:679–687CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preclinical evaluation of a novel anterior non-fusion fixation device for atlantoaxial instability: an in vivo comparison study in a canine model
Authors
Xuan Cai
Xiaoqing Yi
Haopeng Li
Xijing He
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05916-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

European Spine Journal 5/2019 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcement