Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Original Article

Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading

Authors: Richard A. Lindtner, Rene Schmid, Thomas Nydegger, Marko Konschake, Werner Schmoelz

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pedicle screw loosening is a common and significant complication after posterior spinal instrumentation, particularly in osteoporosis. Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) pedicle screws have been developed recently to overcome drawbacks of conventional metallic screws, such as metal-induced imaging artifacts and interference with postoperative radiotherapy. Beyond radiolucency, CF/PEEK may also be advantageous over standard titanium in terms of pedicle screw loosening due to its unique material properties. However, screw anchorage and loosening of CF/PEEK pedicle screws have not been evaluated yet. The aim of this biomechanical study therefore was to evaluate whether the use of this alternative nonmetallic pedicle screw material affects screw loosening. The hypotheses tested were that (1) nonmetallic CF/PEEK pedicle screws resist an equal or higher number of load cycles until loosening than standard titanium screws and that (2) PMMA cement augmentation further increases the number of load cycles until loosening of CF/PEEK screws.

Methods

In the first part of the study, left and right pedicles of ten cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (BMD 70.8 mg/cm3 ± 14.5) were randomly instrumented with either CF/PEEK or standard titanium pedicle screws. In the second part, left and right pedicles of ten vertebrae (BMD 56.3 mg/cm3 ± 15.8) were randomly instrumented with either PMMA-augmented or nonaugmented CF/PEEK pedicle screws. Each pedicle screw was subjected to cyclic cranio-caudal loading (initial load ranging from − 50 N to + 50 N) with stepwise increasing compressive loads (5 N every 100 cycles) until loosening or a maximum of 10,000 cycles. Angular screw motion (“screw toggling”) within the vertebra was measured with a 3D motion analysis system every 100 cycles and by stress fluoroscopy every 500 cycles.

Results

The nonmetallic CF/PEEK pedicle screws resisted a similar number of load cycles until loosening as the contralateral standard titanium screws (3701 ± 1228 vs. 3751 ± 1614 load cycles, p = 0.89). PMMA cement augmentation of CF/PEEK pedicle screws furthermore significantly increased the mean number of load cycles until loosening by 1.63-fold (5100 ± 1933 in augmented vs. 3130 ± 2132 in nonaugmented CF/PEEK screws, p = 0.015). In addition, angular screw motion assessed by stress fluoroscopy was significantly smaller in augmented than in nonaugmented CF/PEEK screws before as well as after failure.

Conclusions

Using nonmetallic CF/PEEK instead of standard titanium as pedicle screw material did not affect screw loosening in the chosen test setup, whereas cement augmentation enhanced screw anchorage of CF/PEEK screws. While comparable to titanium screws in terms of screw loosening, radiolucent CF/PEEK pedicle screws offer the significant advantage of not interfering with postoperative imaging and radiotherapy.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, Zerbi A (2009) Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):102–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, Zerbi A (2009) Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):102–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Rudisch A, Kremser C, Peer S, Kathrein A, Judmaier W, Daniaux H (1998) Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion—a comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences. Spine 23:692–699CrossRefPubMed Rudisch A, Kremser C, Peer S, Kathrein A, Judmaier W, Daniaux H (1998) Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion—a comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences. Spine 23:692–699CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Eicker SO, Krajewski K, Payer S, Krätzig T, Dreimann M (2017) First experience with carbon/PEEK pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Sci 61:222–224PubMed Eicker SO, Krajewski K, Payer S, Krätzig T, Dreimann M (2017) First experience with carbon/PEEK pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Sci 61:222–224PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ringel F, Ryang YM, Kirschke JS, Müller BS, Wilkens JJ, Brodard J, Combs SE, Meyer B (2017) Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws for treatment of spinal tumors: advantages for radiation planning and follow-up imaging. World Neurosurg 105:294–301CrossRefPubMed Ringel F, Ryang YM, Kirschke JS, Müller BS, Wilkens JJ, Brodard J, Combs SE, Meyer B (2017) Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws for treatment of spinal tumors: advantages for radiation planning and follow-up imaging. World Neurosurg 105:294–301CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nevelsky A, Borzov E, Daniel S, Bar-Deroma R (2017) Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:62–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nevelsky A, Borzov E, Daniel S, Bar-Deroma R (2017) Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:62–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke HJ (2015) Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J 24:1005–1016CrossRefPubMed Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke HJ (2015) Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J 24:1005–1016CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Röllinghoff M, Schlüter-Brust K, Groos D, Sobottke R, Michael JW, Eysel P, Delank KS (2010) Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Orthop Rev 2:e3CrossRef Röllinghoff M, Schlüter-Brust K, Groos D, Sobottke R, Michael JW, Eysel P, Delank KS (2010) Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Orthop Rev 2:e3CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bredow J, Boese CK, Werner CML, Siewe J, Löhrer L, Zarghooni K, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ (2016) Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1063–1067CrossRefPubMed Bredow J, Boese CK, Werner CML, Siewe J, Löhrer L, Zarghooni K, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ (2016) Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1063–1067CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference El Saman A, Meier S, Sander A, Kelm A, Marzi I, Laurer H (2013) Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39:455–460CrossRefPubMed El Saman A, Meier S, Sander A, Kelm A, Marzi I, Laurer H (2013) Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39:455–460CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pearson HB, Dobbs CJ, Grantham E, Niebur GL, Chappuis JL, Boerckel JD (2017) Intraoperative biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw loosening following successful arthrodesis. J Orthop Res 35:2673–2681CrossRefPubMed Pearson HB, Dobbs CJ, Grantham E, Niebur GL, Chappuis JL, Boerckel JD (2017) Intraoperative biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw loosening following successful arthrodesis. J Orthop Res 35:2673–2681CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shea TM, Laun J, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Lee WE 3rd, Aghayev K, Vrionis FD (2014) Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int 2014:748393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shea TM, Laun J, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Lee WE 3rd, Aghayev K, Vrionis FD (2014) Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int 2014:748393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Elder BD, Lo SF, Holmes C, Goodwin CR, Kosztowski TA, Lina IA, Locke JE, Witham TF (2015) The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement. Spine J 15:1432–1445CrossRefPubMed Elder BD, Lo SF, Holmes C, Goodwin CR, Kosztowski TA, Lina IA, Locke JE, Witham TF (2015) The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement. Spine J 15:1432–1445CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Inage K, Sainoh T, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) Comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate treatment to reduce pedicle screw loosening after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bone quality perspective. Spine 38:E487–E492CrossRefPubMed Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Inage K, Sainoh T, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) Comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate treatment to reduce pedicle screw loosening after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bone quality perspective. Spine 38:E487–E492CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mavrogenis AF, Vottis C, Triantafyllopoulos G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Pneumaticos SG (2014) PEEK rod systems for the spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(Suppl 1):S111–S116CrossRefPubMed Mavrogenis AF, Vottis C, Triantafyllopoulos G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Pneumaticos SG (2014) PEEK rod systems for the spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(Suppl 1):S111–S116CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chou WK, Chien A, Wang JL (2015) Biomechanical analysis between PEEK and titanium screw-rods spinal construct subjected to fatigue loading. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E121–E125CrossRefPubMed Chou WK, Chien A, Wang JL (2015) Biomechanical analysis between PEEK and titanium screw-rods spinal construct subjected to fatigue loading. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E121–E125CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Turner JL, Paller DJ, Murrell CB (2010) The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Spine 35:E1076–E1082CrossRefPubMed Turner JL, Paller DJ, Murrell CB (2010) The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Spine 35:E1076–E1082CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shi L, Wang L, Guo Z, Wu ZX, Liu D, Gao MX, Wan SY, Fu SC, Li SJ, Lei W (2012) A study of low elastic modulus expandable pedicle screws in osteoporotic sheep. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:123–128CrossRefPubMed Shi L, Wang L, Guo Z, Wu ZX, Liu D, Gao MX, Wan SY, Fu SC, Li SJ, Lei W (2012) A study of low elastic modulus expandable pedicle screws in osteoporotic sheep. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:123–128CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR (2009) Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine J 9:263–267CrossRefPubMed Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR (2009) Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine J 9:263–267CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, Yachouh J (2016) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 27:118CrossRefPubMed Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, Yachouh J (2016) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 27:118CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kersten RFMR, van Gaalen SM, de Gast A, Öner FC (2015) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. Spine J 15:1446–1460CrossRefPubMed Kersten RFMR, van Gaalen SM, de Gast A, Öner FC (2015) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. Spine J 15:1446–1460CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Li CS, Vannabouathong C, Sprague S, Bhandari M (2015) The use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: a systematic review. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 8:33–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li CS, Vannabouathong C, Sprague S, Bhandari M (2015) The use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: a systematic review. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 8:33–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Bostelmann R, Keiler A, Steiger HJ, Scholz A, Cornelius JF, Schmoelz W (2017) Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading. Eur Spine J 26:181–188CrossRefPubMed Bostelmann R, Keiler A, Steiger HJ, Scholz A, Cornelius JF, Schmoelz W (2017) Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading. Eur Spine J 26:181–188CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Schmoelz W, Heinrichs CH, Schmidt S, Piñera AR, Tome-Bermejo F, Duart JM, Bauer M, Galovich LÁ (2017) Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage. Eur Spine J 26:2883–2890CrossRefPubMed Schmoelz W, Heinrichs CH, Schmidt S, Piñera AR, Tome-Bermejo F, Duart JM, Bauer M, Galovich LÁ (2017) Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage. Eur Spine J 26:2883–2890CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bruner HJ, Guan Y, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Slivka MA (2010) Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 13:766–772CrossRefPubMed Bruner HJ, Guan Y, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Slivka MA (2010) Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 13:766–772CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Ahn YH, Chen WM, Lee KY, Park KW, Lee SJ (2008) Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed Mater 3:044101CrossRefPubMed Ahn YH, Chen WM, Lee KY, Park KW, Lee SJ (2008) Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed Mater 3:044101CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Zhou R, Huang Z, Liu X, Tong J, Ji W, Liu S, Zhu Q (2016) Kinematics and load-sharing of an anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct with PEEK rods: an in vitro biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 40:1–7CrossRef Zhou R, Huang Z, Liu X, Tong J, Ji W, Liu S, Zhu Q (2016) Kinematics and load-sharing of an anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct with PEEK rods: an in vitro biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 40:1–7CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wang N, Xie H, Xi C, Zhang H, Yan J (2017) A study to compare the efficacy of polyether ether ketone rod device with titanium devices in posterior spinal fusion in a canine model. J Orthop Surg Res 12:40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang N, Xie H, Xi C, Zhang H, Yan J (2017) A study to compare the efficacy of polyether ether ketone rod device with titanium devices in posterior spinal fusion in a canine model. J Orthop Surg Res 12:40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Jin YJ, Kim YE, Seo JH, Choi HW, Jahng TA (2013) Effects of rod stiffness and fusion mass on the adjacent segments after floating mono-segmental fusion: a study using finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 22:1066–1077CrossRefPubMed Jin YJ, Kim YE, Seo JH, Choi HW, Jahng TA (2013) Effects of rod stiffness and fusion mass on the adjacent segments after floating mono-segmental fusion: a study using finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 22:1066–1077CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Lin DJ, Chuang CC, Chern Lin JH, Lee JW, Ju CP, Yin HS (2007) Bone formation at the surface of low modulus Ti-7.5Mo implants in rabbit femur. Biomaterials 28:2582–2589CrossRefPubMed Lin DJ, Chuang CC, Chern Lin JH, Lee JW, Ju CP, Yin HS (2007) Bone formation at the surface of low modulus Ti-7.5Mo implants in rabbit femur. Biomaterials 28:2582–2589CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Stoppie N, Van Oosterwyck H, Jansen J, Wolke J, Wevers M, Naert I (2009) The influence of Young’s modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee. J Biomed Mater Res 90A:792–803CrossRef Stoppie N, Van Oosterwyck H, Jansen J, Wolke J, Wevers M, Naert I (2009) The influence of Young’s modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee. J Biomed Mater Res 90A:792–803CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Weiser L, Huber G, Sellenschloh K, Viezens L, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Lehmann W (2017) Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength. Eur Spine J 26:2891–2897CrossRefPubMed Weiser L, Huber G, Sellenschloh K, Viezens L, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Lehmann W (2017) Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength. Eur Spine J 26:2891–2897CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hoppe S, Loosli Y, Baumgartner D, Heini P, Benneker L (2014) Influence of screw augmentation in posterior dynamic and rigid stabilization systems in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Spine 39:E384–E389CrossRefPubMed Hoppe S, Loosli Y, Baumgartner D, Heini P, Benneker L (2014) Influence of screw augmentation in posterior dynamic and rigid stabilization systems in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Spine 39:E384–E389CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kueny RA, Kolb JP, Lehmann W, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Huber G (2014) Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Eur Spine J 23:2196–2202CrossRefPubMed Kueny RA, Kolb JP, Lehmann W, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Huber G (2014) Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Eur Spine J 23:2196–2202CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Kaiser D, Volkheimer D, Hackenbroch C, Püschel K, Rauschmann M (2016) A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Eur Spine J 25:2919–2928CrossRefPubMed Wilke HJ, Kaiser D, Volkheimer D, Hackenbroch C, Püschel K, Rauschmann M (2016) A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Eur Spine J 25:2919–2928CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Liebsch C, Zimmermann J, Graf N, Schilling C, Wilke HJ, Kienle A (2018) In vitro validation of a novel mechanical model for testing the anchorage capacity of pedicle screws using physiological load application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:578–585CrossRefPubMed Liebsch C, Zimmermann J, Graf N, Schilling C, Wilke HJ, Kienle A (2018) In vitro validation of a novel mechanical model for testing the anchorage capacity of pedicle screws using physiological load application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:578–585CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading
Authors
Richard A. Lindtner
Rene Schmid
Thomas Nydegger
Marko Konschake
Werner Schmoelz
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5538-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

European Spine Journal 8/2018 Go to the issue