Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Normal variation in sagittal spinal alignment parameters in adult patients: an EOS study using serial imaging

Authors: Hwee Weng Dennis Hey, Kian Loong Melvin Tan, Vikaesh Moorthy, Eugene Tze-Chun Lau, Leok-Lim Lau, Gabriel Liu, Hee-Kit Wong

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe normal variations in sagittal spinal radiographic parameters over an interval period and establish physiological norms and guidelines for which these images should be interpreted.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected from a continuous series of adult patients with first-episode mild low back pain presenting to a single institution. The sagittal parameters of two serial radiographic images taken 6-months apart were obtained with the EOS® slot scanner. Measured parameters include CL, TK, TL, LL, PI, PT, SS, and end and apical vertebrae. Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results

Sixty patients with a total of 120 whole-body sagittal X-rays were analysed. Mean age was 52.1 years (SD 21.2). Mean interval between the first and second X-rays was 126.2 days (SD 47.2). Small variations (< 1°) occur for all except PT (1.2°), CL (1.2°), and SVA (2.9 cm). Pelvic tilt showed significant difference between two images (p = 0.035). Subgroup analysis based on the time interval between X-rays, and between the first and second X-rays, did not show significant differences. Consistent findings were found for end and apical vertebrae of the thoracic and lumbar spine between the first and second X-rays for sagittal curve shapes.

Conclusions

Radiographic sagittal parameters vary between serial images and reflect dynamism in spinal balancing. SVA and PT are predisposed to the widest variation. SVA has the largest variation between individuals of low pelvic tilt. Therefore, interpretation of these parameters should be patient specific and relies on trends rather than a one-time assessment.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(1):40–47CrossRefPubMed Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(1):40–47CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Iyer S et al (2016) Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(23):1826–1836CrossRef Iyer S et al (2016) Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(23):1826–1836CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Le Huec JC, Demezon H, Aunoble S (2015) Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 24(1):63–71CrossRefPubMed Le Huec JC, Demezon H, Aunoble S (2015) Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 24(1):63–71CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hey HW et al (2017) Cervical alignment variations in different postures and predictors of normal cervical kyphosis—a new understanding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(21):1614–1621CrossRef Hey HW et al (2017) Cervical alignment variations in different postures and predictors of normal cervical kyphosis—a new understanding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(21):1614–1621CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hey HW et al (2016) How the spine differs in standing and in sitting-important considerations for correction of spinal deformity. Spine J 17(6):799–806CrossRefPubMed Hey HW et al (2016) How the spine differs in standing and in sitting-important considerations for correction of spinal deformity. Spine J 17(6):799–806CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP (2009) Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(17):E599–E606CrossRef Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP (2009) Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(17):E599–E606CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Roguski M et al (2014) Postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance negatively affects outcomes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(25):2070–2077CrossRef Roguski M et al (2014) Postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance negatively affects outcomes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(25):2070–2077CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2024–2029CrossRef Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2024–2029CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH (2000) Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 9(6):492–498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH (2000) Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 9(6):492–498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K et al (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688CrossRefPubMed Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K et al (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(25):2224–2231CrossRef Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(25):2224–2231CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lamartina C et al (2012) Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S27–S31CrossRefPubMed Lamartina C et al (2012) Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S27–S31CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Imagama S, Ito Z, Wakao N, Seki T, Hirano K, Muramoto A, Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y (2013) Influence of spinal sagittal alignment, body balance, muscle strength, and physical ability on falling of middle-aged and elderly males. Eur Spine J 22(6):1346–1353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Imagama S, Ito Z, Wakao N, Seki T, Hirano K, Muramoto A, Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y (2013) Influence of spinal sagittal alignment, body balance, muscle strength, and physical ability on falling of middle-aged and elderly males. Eur Spine J 22(6):1346–1353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Yoshimoto H, Sato S, Masuda T (2005) Spinopelvic alignment in patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip: a radiographic comparison to patients with low back pain. Spine 30:1650–1657CrossRefPubMed Yoshimoto H, Sato S, Masuda T (2005) Spinopelvic alignment in patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip: a radiographic comparison to patients with low back pain. Spine 30:1650–1657CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(3):346–353CrossRef Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(3):346–353CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hey HW et al (2017) Differences in erect sitting and natural sitting spinal alignment-insights into a new paradigm and implications in deformity correction. Spine J 17(2):183–189CrossRefPubMed Hey HW et al (2017) Differences in erect sitting and natural sitting spinal alignment-insights into a new paradigm and implications in deformity correction. Spine J 17(2):183–189CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Coorevits P, Vleeming A, Danneels L (2013) Classification system of the normal variation in sagittal standing plane alignment: a study among young adolescent boys. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(16):E1003–E1012CrossRef Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Coorevits P, Vleeming A, Danneels L (2013) Classification system of the normal variation in sagittal standing plane alignment: a study among young adolescent boys. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(16):E1003–E1012CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bae J, Theologis A, Jang JS, Lee SH, Deviren V (2016) Impact of fatigue on maintenance of upright posture: dynamic assessment of sagittal spinal deformity parameters after walking 10 minutes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(10):733–739CrossRef Bae J, Theologis A, Jang JS, Lee SH, Deviren V (2016) Impact of fatigue on maintenance of upright posture: dynamic assessment of sagittal spinal deformity parameters after walking 10 minutes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(10):733–739CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Normal variation in sagittal spinal alignment parameters in adult patients: an EOS study using serial imaging
Authors
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey
Kian Loong Melvin Tan
Vikaesh Moorthy
Eugene Tze-Chun Lau
Leok-Lim Lau
Gabriel Liu
Hee-Kit Wong
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5459-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

European Spine Journal 3/2018 Go to the issue