Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2018

Open Access 01-06-2018 | Original Article

Substantial clinical benefit for Neck Disability Index revisited: establishing the goal for treatment?

Authors: Roland D. Donk, Andre L. M. Verbeek, Wim I. M. Verhagen, Hans Groenewoud, Allard T. F. Hosman, Ronald H. M. A. Bartels

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

It is difficult for clinicians to inform patients about the success rate of a treatment as a cervical anterior discectomy procedure. Ideally, a proportion of good outcome as rated by patients is known. Patient-reported outcome measurements are helpful. The purpose is to relate the difference in Neck Disability Index (NDI) after a cervical anterior discectomy procedure for single level cervical degenerative disc disease with the patients’ rating of their actual clinical situation after long‐term follow-up to define the substantial clinical benefit (SCB).

Methods

After completion of the NDI, patients who were surgically treated for cervical single level degenerative disease were asked to complete a five‐item Likert scale to rate their clinical situation. After dichotomisation of the outcome in good versus less than good, a cut‐off value was defined by determining the value of the difference of NDI with the highest specificity and sensitivity. Funding was not obtained.

Results

SCB for NDI after surgery for cervical single level degenerative disease should be set at ten with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 for sensitivity as well specificity.

Conclusions

The goal for each treatment is a good outcome. While comparing treatments for cervical degenerative disc disease only those with an SCB of ten will be relevant for the patient, as patients who achieved this difference in NDI rated their actual situation at long‐term follow‐up as good.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415CrossRefPubMed Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wells G, Beaton D, Shea B, Boers M, Simon L, Strand V, Brooks P, Tugwell P (2001) Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol 28:406–412PubMed Wells G, Beaton D, Shea B, Boers M, Simon L, Strand V, Brooks P, Tugwell P (2001) Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol 28:406–412PubMed
3.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Copay AG, Berven SH, Polly DW, Subach BR, Carreon LY (2008) Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:1839–1847. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01095 CrossRef Glassman SD, Copay AG, Berven SH, Polly DW, Subach BR, Carreon LY (2008) Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:1839–1847. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​G.​01095 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA (2010) Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 10:469–474. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007 CrossRefPubMed Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA (2010) Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 10:469–474. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2010.​02.​007 CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147:573–577CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147:573–577CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fuson RL, Sherman M, Van Vleet J, Wendt T (1997) The conduct of orthopaedic clinical trials. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1089–1098CrossRef Fuson RL, Sherman M, Van Vleet J, Wendt T (1997) The conduct of orthopaedic clinical trials. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1089–1098CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bartels RH, Donk R, van der Wilt GJ, Grotenhuis JA, Venderink D (2006) Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi-center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:85. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-85 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bartels RH, Donk R, van der Wilt GJ, Grotenhuis JA, Venderink D (2006) Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi-center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:85. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-7-85 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Wells G, Anderson J, Beaton D, Bellamy N, Boers M, Bombardier C, Breedveld F, Carr A, Cranney A, Dougados M, Felson D, Kirwan J, Schiff M, Shea B, Simon L, Smolen J, Strand V, Tugwell P, van Riel P, Welch VA (2001) Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. J Rheumatol 28:452–454PubMed Wells G, Anderson J, Beaton D, Bellamy N, Boers M, Bombardier C, Breedveld F, Carr A, Cranney A, Dougados M, Felson D, Kirwan J, Schiff M, Shea B, Simon L, Smolen J, Strand V, Tugwell P, van Riel P, Welch VA (2001) Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. J Rheumatol 28:452–454PubMed
Metadata
Title
Substantial clinical benefit for Neck Disability Index revisited: establishing the goal for treatment?
Authors
Roland D. Donk
Andre L. M. Verbeek
Wim I. M. Verhagen
Hans Groenewoud
Allard T. F. Hosman
Ronald H. M. A. Bartels
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5260-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

European Spine Journal 6/2018 Go to the issue